Physiol Rev Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Physiol. Rev. 78: 583-686, 1998;
0031-9333/98 $15.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A corrigendum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FITZSIMONS, J. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by FITZSIMONS, J. T.

PHYSIOLOGICAL REVIEWS   Vol. 78 No. 3 July 1998, pp. 583-686
Copyright ©1998 by the American Physiological Society

Angiotensin, Thirst, and Sodium Appetite

J. T. FITZSIMONS

The Physiological Laboratory, Cambridge, United Kingdom

I. INTRODUCTION
    A. Angiotensin-Induced Drinking Behavior
    B. Renin-Angiotensin Systems
II. HYPOVOLEMIC THIRST AND SODIUM APPETITE
    A. Causes of Hypovolemic Thirst
    B. Detection of Hypovolemia and the Threshold of Response
    C. Arousal of Sodium Appetite
    D. Initial Evidence Suggesting Involvement of the Renal Renin-Angiotensin System in Drinking Caused by Hypovolemia
    E. The Question of Whether Angiotensins Originating in Brain and Other Tissues Are Involved in Drinking Behavior
    F. Comment
III. ANGIOTENSIN-INDUCED THIRST
    A. Angiotensin-Induced Water Intake in Rat
    B. Angiotensin-Induced Water Intake in Other Mammals
    C. Angiotensin-Induced Water Intake in Birds, Reptiles, and Fish
    D. Amphibians
    E. Importance of Sodium
    F. Comment
IV. ANGIOTENSIN-INDUCED SODIUM APPETITE
    A. Angiotensin-Induced Sodium Intake
    B. Angiotensin-Induced Sodium Appetite, a More Complex Response Than Angiotensin-Induced Thirst
    C. Comment
V. EFFECTS OF ANGIOTENSIN ANALOGS AND ANTAGONISTS ON DRINKING
    A. Angiotensin Structure-Activity and Drinking
    B. Angiotensin Antagonists
    C. Renin and Angiotensin II Precursors
    D. Angiotensin-(1--7) Heptapeptide
    E. Angiotensin-(2--8) Heptapeptide or Angiotensin III
    F. Angiotensin-(3--8) Hexapeptide or Angiotensin IV and Shorter Chain Angiotensin Peptides
    G. Comment
VI. CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM AND ANGIOTENSIN-INDUCED DRINKING
    A. C-fos Expression After Angiotensin
    B. Circumventricular Organs
    C. Anteroventral Third Ventricular Region and Lamina Terminalis
    D. Organum Vasculosum of the Lamina Terminalis
    E. Subfornical Organ
    F. Amygdala
    G. Brain Stem and Area Postrema
    H. Comment
VII. ROLE OF ANGIOTENSIN PEPTIDES FORMED FROM PRECURSORS IN BRAIN IN DRINKING
    A. Components and Distribution
    B. Possible Functions
    C. Role in Drinking
    D. Comment
VIII. NEUROTRANSMITTERS AND ANGIOTENSIN-INDUCED DRINKING
    A. Acetylcholine
    B. Catecholamines
    C. Serotonin
    D. Excitatory and Inhibitory Amino Acids
    E. Tachykinins and Bombesin-Like Peptides
    F. Opioids
    G. Endothelins
    H. Natriuretic Peptides
    I. Vasopressin
    J. Oxytocin
    K. Prostaglandins
    L. Nitric Oxide
    M. Other Neuroactive Substances
    N. Comment
IX. DRUG-INDUCED HYPERRENINEMIA AND DRINKING
    A. beta -Adrenergics
    B. Furosemide
    C. Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
    D. Histamine
    E. Serotonin
    F. 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine
    G. Insulin
    H. Comment
X. EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL CAUSES OF RENIN-DEPENDENT DRINKING
    A. Obstruction of the Inferior Vena Cava
    B. Heart Failure
    C. Hyperoncotic Dialysis
    D. Sodium Appetite of Adrenal Insufficiency
    E. Circulatory Shock
    F. Experimental Renal Hypertension
    G. Diseases of the Kidney and Hyperreninemia
    H. Ureteric Ligation
    I. Diabetes Insipidus and the Brattleboro Rat
    J. Diabetes Mellitus
    K. Comment
XI. CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES

    ABSTRACT
Top
References

Fitzsimons, J. T. Angiotensin, Thirst, and Sodium Appetite. Physiol. Rev. 78: 583-686, 1998. --- Angiotensin (ANG) II is a powerful and phylogenetically widespread stimulus to thirst and sodium appetite. When it is injected directly into sensitive areas of the brain, it causes an immediate increase in water intake followed by a slower increase in NaCl intake. Drinking is vigorous, highly motivated, and rapidly completed. The amounts of water taken within 15 min or so of injection can exceed what the animal would spontaneously drink in the course of its normal activities over 24 h. The increase in NaCl intake is slower in onset, more persistent, and affected by experience. Increases in circulating ANG II have similar effects on drinking, although these may be partly obscured by accompanying rises in blood pressure. The circumventricular organs, median preoptic nucleus, and tissue surrounding the anteroventral third ventricle in the lamina terminalis (AV3V region) provide the neuroanatomic focus for thirst, sodium appetite, and cardiovascular control, making extensive connections with the hypothalamus, limbic system, and brain stem. The AV3V region is well provided with angiotensinergic nerve endings and angiotensin AT1 receptors, the receptor type responsible for acute responses to ANG II, and it responds vigorously to the dipsogenic action of ANG II. The nucleus tractus solitarius and other structures in the brain stem form part of a negative-feedback system for blood volume control, responding to baroreceptor and volume receptor information from the circulation and sending ascending noradrenergic and other projections to the AV3V region. The subfornical organ, organum vasculosum of the lamina terminalis and area postrema contain ANG II-sensitive receptors that allow circulating ANG II to interact with central nervous structures involved in hypovolemic thirst and sodium appetite and blood pressure control. Angiotensin peptides generated inside the blood-brain barrier may act as conventional neurotransmitters or, in view of the many instances of anatomic separation between sites of production and receptors, they may act as paracrine agents at a distance from their point of release. An attractive speculation is that some are responsible for long-term changes in neuronal organization, especially of sodium appetite. Anatomic mismatches between sites of production and receptors are less evident in limbic and brain stem structures responsible for body fluid homeostasis and blood pressure control. Limbic structures are rich in other neuroactive peptides, some of which have powerful effects on drinking, and they and many of the classical nonpeptide neurotransmitters may interact with ANG II to augment or inhibit drinking behavior. Because ANG II immunoreactivity and binding are so widely distributed in the central nervous system, brain ANG II is unlikely to have a role as circumscribed as that of circulating ANG II. Angiotensin peptides generated from brain precursors may also be involved in functions that have little immediate effect on body fluid homeostasis and blood pressure control, such as cell differentiation, regeneration and remodeling, or learning and memory. Analysis of the mechanisms of increased drinking caused by drugs and experimental procedures that activate the renal renin-angiotensin system, and clinical conditions in which renal renin secretion is increased, have provided evidence that endogenously released renal renin can generate enough circulating ANG II to stimulate drinking. But it is also certain that other mechanisms of thirst and sodium appetite still operate when the effects of circulating ANG II are blocked or absent, although it is not known whether this is also true for angiotensin peptides formed in the brain. Whether ANG II should be regarded primarily as a hormone released in hypovolemia helping to defend the blood volume, a neurotransmitter or paracrine agent with a privileged role in the neural pathways for thirst and sodium appetite of all kinds, a neural organizer especially in sodium appetite, or all of these, remains uncertain. ANG II-induced drinking behavior serves as a model of how other complex behaviors involving neural and peptide inputs might be organized.

    I. INTRODUCTION
Top
Next
References

Angiotensin-induced drinking behavior is a remarkable phenomenon. I discuss it in detail and analyze the different circumstances in which angiotensin peptides may be involved in thirst and sodium appetite. There has been an enormous amount of work on these topics in the past 30 years, and it would be impracticable to survey all that has been published. What follows is therefore selective and very much what has interested me. I have tried to allow for personal bias by citing key review articles or chapters in books for certain aspects of the work described here. I have also given an extended list of monographs, multiauthor works, and conference proceedings devoted to thirst, sodium appetite, and renin-angiotensin systems.

Thirst is a sensation aroused by a need for water, and relief from it is sought by drinking water. We infer from our own experience in similar circumstances that the dehydrated animal eagerly seeking water is also experiencing thirst. But lecturing, singing, eating a spicy meal, seeking pleasure from a refreshing drink of water on a hot day, or just habit may lead to increased consumption of water, although there may be no immediate need for it and no thirst in the strict sense of the word. Perhaps the appropriate term to use here is appetite for water. There are also circumstances in which animals continue to drink water or can be made to do so even though their needs for water have been met many times over. For example, rats infused with more water than they needed in the 24 h, by routes that bypassed the mouth and pharynx, continued to drink spontaneously about one-third or more of their preinfusion intake of water (184). It is important to be aware of circumstances such as these when assessing the results of experiments on drinking behavior. We reasonably assume that animals experience the same sensations as ourselves when they suffer the same deficits, but we should also recognize that animals, like ourselves, drink water for reasons other than to repair a water deficit; they have urges and preferences as well as needs that they seek to gratify. And although it is desirable that we restrict the word thirst to the sensation aroused by a lack of water, in general usage it incorporates both an idea of appetite for water as well as a drive toward relief of a need. We are often tempted by water as well as driven to assuage our thirst.

Increased sodium appetite indicates a need for sodium, and relief will be sought by consuming salt or salty foods. But much more so than with thirst, experience of a previous occasion of sodium deficit and the satisfaction afforded by the taste of salt and consequent intake may so condition behavior that an appetite for repetition of this experience is quickly established. In other words, sodium intake is commonly driven by preference as well as need, and the subject gains satisfaction from it as well as relief. Cannon (89) wrote, "It is not to be supposed that the two motivating agencies --- the pang and the pleasure --- are as separate as we have been regarding them for the purposes of analysis in the present discussion. They may be closely mingled; when relief from hunger or thirst is found, the appetite may simultaneously be satiated." Cannon was discussing hunger (the pang) and appetite (the pleasure) for food, but his remarks apply with equal force to hunger or appetite for sodium. In most circumstances of sodium need, sodium intake is undoubtedly driven by need, but there is also an element of preference: both the pang and the pleasure operate. These are the reasons why, like most workers in the field from Richter (479) onward, I have preferred to use the word sodium or salt appetite rather than sodium hunger, since appetite implies preference as well as need and it takes account of the powerful effects of learning on the response to a need. I have also preferred to use sodium instead of salt because salt can mean a nonsodium salt.

A. Angiotensin-Induced Drinking Behavior

1. A model of a peptidergic control system

An injection of angiotensin (ANG) II into sensitive limbic structures causes an animal to stop whatever it was doing and to start drinking water almost immediately. In the next 15 min or so, the amounts of water drunk after the larger doses of ANG II are comparable to the 24-h water intakes of unstimulated, spontaneously behaving animals with continuous access to food and water. Drinking is therefore powerfully motivated, and there is a clear-cut ANG II dose-response relation. Later, an increased sodium appetite may develop. For many years, ANG II was regarded as an exclusively circulating hormone, generated in the bloodstream from the prohormone angiotensinogen by the processing enzymes, renal renin and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE). It is now well established, however, that angiotensin peptides are also produced elsewhere in the body where they may have a significant part to play in drinking behavior. This applies particularly to angiotensin peptides produced in the central nervous system. Their presence in nervous structures raises questions about possible functions and how they might interact with other neuroactive substances produced in or reaching the brain. Angiotensinergic nerve fiber systems are widely distributed in the limbic system and brain stem. Angiotensinergic terminals are particularly dense in the anterior hypothalamus and tissue surrounding the anteroventral third ventricle (AV3V) region including the organum vasculosum of the lamina terminalis (OVLT) and median preoptic (MnPO) nucleus, in the subfornical organ (SFO), supraoptic nucleus (SON), and paraventricular nucleus (PVN), the central nucleus of the amygdala and brain stem nuclei such as nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS), parabrachial nuclei, and locus ceruleus. The relation between the delivery of angiotensin peptides and the receptors on which they act indicates that in some instances the peptide may act as a classical neurotransmitter with fast but transient point-to-point signaling on low-affinity sites, whereas in other instances the peptide could diffuse into the extracellular space and act at some distance on high-affinity receptors producing volume or paracrine effects. The complexity of the molecular structure of angiotensin peptides suggests that this latter mode of action may be an important one and supports the view that angiotensin peptides play a privileged role in determining the pattern of the dipsogenic, natriorexigenic, body fluid homeostatic, cardiovascular, and endocrine adaptations to hemorrhage and other causes of hypovolemia. Because of its easily measured characteristics, precision, and physiological appropriateness, the angiotensin-induced drinking response is an ideal model to study the workings of peptidergic control systems (
186).

2. Reviews and books on angiotensin, thirst, and sodium appetite

Renin is dealt with in comprehensive detail in Robertson and Nicholls' (
482) multiauthor treatise, The Renin-Angiotensin System. Many outstanding reviews have appeared over the years on various aspects of the renin-angiotensin system. These include "Angiotensin" (Page and Bumpus, Ref. 434), "Pharmacology of angiotensin" (Regoli et al., Ref. 468), "Renin-angiotensin system: biochemistry and mechanisms of action" (Peach, Ref. 440), "Renin 1978" (Peart, Ref. 441), "The pharmacologic alteration of renin release" (Keeton and Campbell, Ref. 303), "Actions of angiotensin II on the brain: mechanisms and physiologic role" (Reid, Ref. 469), and "Morphology, physiology, and molecular biology of renin secretion" (Hackenthal et al., Ref. 251). All aspects of angiotensin responsiveness in birds, including drinking behavior, are covered in a notable review "Central nervous angiotensin II responsiveness in birds" (Simon et al., Ref. 534). Brain renin and angiotensin are covered by the following excellent reviews: "The brain renin-angiotensin system: basic and functional considerations" (Ganten et al., Ref. 231), "Angiotensin" (Lind and Ganten, Ref. 342), "Regulatory role of brain angiotensins in the control of physiological and behavioral responses" (Wright and Harding, Ref. 674), "Brain and pituitary angiotensin" (Saavedra, Ref. 506), and "The renin-angiotensin system in the brain: an update 1993" (Bunnemann et al., Ref. 77). There are also valuable articles in the conference proceedings: Angiotensin and Blood Pressure Regulation (edited by Harding et al., Ref. 256). The rapidly moving field of angiotensin receptors is dealt with in "Angiotensin II receptor subtypes: characterization, signaling mechanisms, and possible physiological implications" (Bottari, de Gasparo, Steckelings, and Levens, Ref. 53), "Angiotensin II receptors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists" (Timmermans et al., Ref. 622), "Brain angiotensin receptor subtypes in the control of physiological and behavioral responses" (Wright and Harding, Ref. 675), "Receptor-mediated effects of angiotensin II on neurons" (Sumners et al., Ref. 580), "The angiotensin IV system: functional implications" (Wright et al., Ref. 677), "Brain angiotensin receptor subtypes AT1 , AT2 , and AT4 and their functions" (Wright and Harding, Ref. 676), and "Angiotensin receptors in the brain; their role in physiology and behaviour" (Mosimann et al., Ref. 406).

A selection of monographs, reviews, multiauthor works, or conference proceedings on angiotensin-induced drinking behavior or more generally on thirst and sodium appetite with coverage of angiotensin-induced drinking follows. These are the works that I have most used, and the list is not exhaustive: "Thirst" (Fitzsimons, Ref. 182), The Neuropsychology of Thirst (edited by Epstein et al., Ref. 150), Control Mechanisms of Drinking (edited by Peters et al., Ref. 447), "Regulation of water intake" (Andersson, Ref. 9), The Physiology of Thirst and Sodium Appetite (Fitzsimons, Ref. 184), "Mécanismes de réglage de l'ingestion d'eau" (Peters, Ref. 446), "Angiotensin stimulation of the central nervous system" (Fitzsimons, Ref. 185), Thirst (Rolls and Rolls, Ref. 491), The Hunger for Salt: an Anthropological, Physiological and Medical Analysis (Denton, Ref. 122), Body Fluid Homeostasis (edited by Nicolaidis and Fitzsimons, Ref. 419), The Physiology of Thirst and Sodium Appetite (edited by de Caro et al., Ref. 114), Circumventricular Organs and Body Fluids (edited by Gross, Ref. 242), Thirst and Sodium Appetite: Physiological Basis (Grossman, Ref. 246), Neurobiology of Food and Fluid Intake (edited by Stricker, Ref. 565), Thirst: Physiological and Psychological Aspects (edited by Ramsay and Booth, Ref. 462), Sodium Hunger: the Search for a Salty Taste (Schulkin, Ref. 523), Angiotensin in Thirst and Hydromineral Balance (edited by Thornton, Ref. 605), "The neuroendocrinolgy of thirst and sodium appetite: visceral sensory signals and mechanisms of central integration" (Johnson and Thunhorst, Ref, 292). Finally, a source for most of the early work on thirst is A. V. Wolf's classical text Thirst: Physiology of the Urge to Drink and Problems of Water Lack published in 1958 (667).

B. Renin-Angiotensin Systems

1. A brief look at the past

Renin is a major renal hormone, but the kidney is the source of other humoral factors that may influence drinking behavior, and, of course, the effects of excretion itself on the body fluids also affect drinking. Interest in the kidney as an organ of internal secretion goes back at least to the end of the last century, but awareness of a possible direct role in the control of drinking behavior is much more recent. Tigerstedt and Bergman in their classic paper of 1898 (
623) showed that saline extracts of renal cortex caused prolonged rises in blood pressure when injected into anesthetized rabbits. Medullary extracts were inactive. The pressor activity of cortical extracts tolerated heating to 54-56°C very well, but it was destroyed by boiling and it was nondialyzable. Tigerstedt and Bergman (623) named the active substance renin and suggested that overproduction of renin might be a factor in increased vascular resistance and cardiac hypertrophy in certain renal diseases. They drew attention in the opening paragraph of their paper to Brown-Séquard's theory that various organs release substances that are not among the usual catabolites but are of decisive importance for the overall functions of the body. Brown-Séquard and d'Arsonval (66) had found that nephrectomized animals survived longer and developed fewer symptoms when injected with kidney extracts than noninjected animals. Tigerstedt and Bergman (623) produced solid experimental support for the idea that the kidney secretes substances with specific actions, in this case a pressor substance, but they did not speculate on the possible role of substances secreted by the kidney and other organs in regulating vascular tone.

The idea that the kidney has endocrine functions did not attract a great deal of further interest until the early 1930s. Pickering (455), in a well-known text, High Blood Pressure, first published in 1955, commented on the curious 40-year gap in the history of renin following Tigerstedt and Bergman's discovery of a pressor substance in the kidney. During this period, there were few and inconclusive experiments on renin, although there was a continuing interest in the relation between disease of the kidney and hypertension. In 1934, Goldblatt et al. (234) published their pioneering experiments on the production of hypertension in the dog by restricting the blood supply to the kidneys. While recognizing that the rise in pressure might be caused by a pressor substance in the blood, Goldblatt et al. (234) did not at this stage discuss whether renin was this substance, and they did not refer to Tigerstedt and Bergman's paper. However, the possibility that pressor substances released from the ischemic kidney were responsible soon led to the reinvestigation and revival of interest in renin as the prime candidate.

By 1938, when the existence of renin was becoming firmly established, there was a growing belief that renin was an important factor in renal hypertension. Subsequently, many problems have had to be overcome in trying to elucidate the extent of its involvement in other types of hypertension that are not the concern of this review. Meanwhile, much of the physiology of the renin-angiotensin system was being worked out. In the 1940s, the enzymic nature of renin was demonstrated by Braun-Menéndez et al. (57) and Page and Helmer (435). Renin was found to produce its effects by acting on a substrate in plasma to yield an active octapeptide now identified as angiotensin II. Skeggs et al. (546) isolated two angiotensins (called hypertensins) by incubating pig renin with horse serum and determined the amino acid sequences (337, 545). These papers were published in 1956. At about the same time, Elliott and Peart (145) isolated two forms of angiotensin by incubating rabbit renin with ox serum and established the sequence of the decapeptide.

2. The present

Since these pioneering experiments, the components of the renin-angiotensin cascade have been identified and characterized (Fig.
1). It is undisputed that the kidney is a major organ of internal secretion, as stated more than a hundred years ago by Brown-Séquard and d'Arsonval (66), producing many other substances as well as renin that are secreted into blood, lymph, or tissue. The source of renal renin is the juxtaglomerular apparatus, consisting of renin-producing cells in the media of the afferent glomerular arterioles and extraglomerular mesangial cells lying between the glomerulus and distal tubule of the same nephron. At this point, the distal tubular cells are columnar and form the macula densa. Reduced renal arterial perfusion or sodium delivery to the macula densa, increased renal beta 1-adrenergic nerve stimulation, circulating catecholamines, prostaglandins, and prostacyclin all cause secretion of active renin, whereas ANG II, atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), and vasopressin are inhibitory. Active renin is an acid (aspartyl) protease with narrow substrate specificity limited to one peptide bond in the angiotensinogen molecule (280). Renins from various species are monomeric glycoproteins (except mouse) with molecular weights ranging from 36,000 to 40,000. 


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.   Formation of angiotensin peptides. Nonrenin angiotensinogenases include tonin and cathepsins D and G.

Angiotensin II itself is evolutionarily stable. Only two variants have been described, [Ile5]ANG II in humans and many other mammals and [Val5]ANG II in cattle, sheep, and nonmammalian vertebrates (see Table 3, sect. V). Because the effects of these two variants on drinking behavior are the same, the abbreviation ANG II will be used for both. Angiotensin peptides have numerous autonomic, endocrine, and behavioral effects. Angiotensin II itself causes contraction and hypertrophy of vascular smooth muscle, activation of sympathetic nerves and release of adrenomedullary hormones, secretion of aldosterone, release of pituitary hormones, and sodium and water conservation through its effects on renal hemodynamics and tubular reabsorption. It is also an exceptionally powerful stimulus of drinking behavior, causing increases in both thirst and sodium appetite. There are other less well-defined effects of angiotensin peptides on cell growth, membrane function, protein synthesis, prostaglandin (PG) release, learning, and memory. The effect on drinking behavior is one of the most striking actions of any hormone on behavior, an action that ties in with the crucial role of angiotensin peptides in the control of blood pressure and blood volume.

 
View this table:
[in this window] [in a new window]
 
TABLE 3.   Angiotensin agonists and receptor antagonists mentioned in text

Many other organs, notably the central nervous system, have been found to contain renin and other enzymes that can cause formation of angiotensin peptides independently of the kidney (171, 229) (see sect. VII). Angiotensin II may be formed independently of ACE by pathways involving kallikrein- or chymase-type serine proteases (15). Serine proteases may also activate prorenin and metabolize angiotensinogen directly to ANG II (86). Little is certain about the possible functions of extrarenal angiotensins, but it is believed that brain angiotensins are involved in cardiovascular and body fluid homeostasis and probably in other functions as well. The traditional view of sequential processing in a linear renin-angiotensin cascade, giving rise to ANG II as the single biologically significant ligand, is an oversimplification, since it does not fully account for all the possibilities of angiotensinogen processing. Among the other biologically active angiotensin peptides produced are the COOH-terminal deleted heptapeptide ANG-(1--7) and two NH2-terminal deleted peptides, the heptapeptide ANG-(2--8), or ANG III, and the hexapeptide ANG-(3--8), or ANG IV. There may be others. The angiotensin peptides and antagonists referred to in this review are discussed in detail in section V. Because systemic ANG-(1--7) lowers the blood pressure after a small initial pressor response (36), it is now possible to envisage circumstances in which the different angiotensin peptides could have opposing functions in blood pressure control (236), and this could conceivably be true for other physiological functions.

The use of antagonists of the various stages of the renin-angiotensin cascade has been an invaluable method of investigating the physiology of angiotensin-dependent processes and is dealt with at length in this review. One recent development has been the introduction of receptor subtype selective antagonists in the functional analysis of thirst and sodium appetite. At least two receptor subtypes for angiotensin have been identified in mammal, subtype 1 or AT1 and subtype 2 or AT2 (580, 621, 622), based on their different affinities for structurally dissimilar angiotensin antagonists (see sect. VB). There is considerable heterogeneity within the AT1 and AT2 receptor subpopulations, and there are also additional receptor subtypes that do not fit with the standard definition of the two main subtypes and that may have a role to play in drinking behavior. Most known angiotensin functions are associated with AT1 receptors that are found throughout the body in all species, but it is possible that important functions may be associated with other receptors as discussed in section V. The AT1 receptor is coupled by a G protein, and ANG II produces its effects by increasing cytosolic free calcium. More recent still has been the introduction of antisense oligonucleotides to block angiotensin synthesis or receptors (450). The genetic aspects of renin-angiotensin systems are beginning to be elucidated, and the genes encoding the proteins and receptors of renin-angiotensin systems are being identified. Clearly, the potential of approaches such as the use of antisense oligonucleotides and gene-knockout animal models is enormous, although few results are yet available. Work on renin-angiotensin systems has proliferated to a remarkable degree, but in every aspect of the physiology of these fascinating systems, there remain major uncertainties.

    II. HYPOVOLEMIC THIRST AND SODIUM APPETITE
Top
Previous
Next
References

Cellular dehydration and hypovolemia are the two principal causes of deficit-induced drinking. Loss of cell water is detected by osmoreceptors (and possibly sodium-sensitive receptors) located in the hypothalamus and elsewhere that share in the cellular dehydration and give rise to thirst. There is long-standing evidence on monitoring of extracellular fluid volume by stretch receptors in the walls of the heart and vasculature (232, 547). Hypovolemia is detected by these receptors which cause a delayed increase in sodium appetite as well as thirst. It is in drinking behavior induced by hypovolemia that renin-angiotensin systems seem to be most involved. Circulating ANG II derived from renal renin contributes to hypovolemic thirst. It also plays a role in increased sodium appetite, acting with the mineralocorticoids and other hormones. The part played by ANG II formed locally in the brain in these behaviors is uncertain, but in the rat, it may be more important in sodium appetite than in thirst. Other angiotensin peptides formed in the periphery or brain may contribute, but information is lacking. The circumstance in which hypovolemia leads to increased intakes of water and NaCl, some of the methods used to elicit these behaviors, and early evidence implicating renal renin are considered here.

A. Causes of Hypovolemic Thirst

Experimental procedures that have been used to arouse hypovolemic thirst include bleeding, inducing sodium deficiency (371), causing sequestration of extracellular fluid by intraperitoneal (175) or subcutaneous injection (560, 567) of hyperoncotic colloid, and interfering with venous return to the heart by obstructing the inferior vena cava (176, 178, 197, 614). Among clinical causes are severe diarrhea and vomiting, some forms of renal disease, congestive heart failure, and circulatory shock. Many of the experimental and clinical causes are considered in section X. Hypovolemia leads to an increase in circulating ANG II, and this contributes to drinking, although it is not exclusively responsible for the overall drinking response. On the other hand, even in the absence of any other stimulus, thirst can be aroused by injecting ANG II or causing it to be formed by drugs or surgical procedures. Because there is no additional renal renin release in cellular dehydration, circulating ANG II does not contribute to the thirst aroused, although angiotensin of cerebral origin may (see sect. VII). In mixed cellular and extracellular dehydration, ANG II like any other thirst stimulus adds its effect to the overall drinking response. As for spontaneous day-to-day drinking, here water intake is usually in excess of need, and much of the evidence suggests that drinking is determined by habit, showing the characteristics of a nyctohemeral rhythm entrained with feeding, with no fluid deficit or hormonal signal involved (184). However, it has also been suggested that release of histamine and transient hypovolemia associated with feeding may cause release of enough renal renin to stimulate drinking.

B. Detection of Hypovolemia and the Threshold of Response

Hypovolemia is detected by vascular stretch receptors in various parts of the circulation and possibly by other types of receptor as well (197, 232, 252, 292, 522). Unloading of cardiopulmonary and arterial stretch receptors as venous return and cardiac output drop, pulse pressure narrows, and mean arterial pressure falls, causes a number of compensatory responses, including increased sympathetic activation; decreased vagal tone; increased secretion of renin, aldosterone, ACTH, and vasopressin; and increased drinking. Reflex circulatory adjustments to loss of volume are rapid; renal conservation of water and electrolytes and replacement of the deficits of water and sodium by intake mechanisms are slower responses that depend on both neural and hormonal mechanisms. A deficit in plasma volume of ~8-10% (or this degree of underfilling in critical receptor regions in the heart and blood vessels) causes significant drinking, a threshold that is considerably higher than the deficit of 1 or 2% of cellular water needed to arouse osmotic thirst.

It seems possible that the hypovolemic threshold is higher than the osmotic because the range of blood flow rates required in different activities is so extended and the scope for changes in the distribution of cardiac output and the partitioning of fluid across the capillary wall so great that it is necessary to avoid the controls of extracellular volume being constantly triggered by smaller changes in plasma volume. The ample reserve of fluid in the interstitial fluid compartment acts as a buffer for plasma volume and can be mobilized through operation of the Starling capillary filtration/reabsorption system should the need to correct hypovolemia arise. It would be inappropriate if the circulatory adjustments accompanying different levels of bodily activity were to arouse thirst because of what turned out to be temporary understimulation of vascular stretch receptors, which ended as soon as the activity diminished and circulatory function returned to the resting state. It would make little sense were hypovolemic thirst mechanisms to keep switching on and off in this way because of transient shifts of blood between vascular beds. But once the loss of circulating volume becomes significant and persistent, drinking under the control of hypovolemic thirst is as vigorous as that caused by equivalent cell dehydration, and the amounts of water drunk may be greater than after cellular dehydration of similar magnitude. The requirements of the cellular fluid compartment are different; in contrast to the variable volume demands of the circulation, stability of cellular water content is a necessary condition for normal cell function.

We can only speculate on the mechanisms that are responsible for the long-term precision of blood volume control. This control, which allows for large short-term variations in the distribution of blood and the partitioning of fluid between the plasma and interstitial compartments depending on circulatory needs, implies the accurate monitoring of volume in certain strategic regions of the circulation, at least for part of the time, perhaps integrated over the long-term during periods of rest.

Neural and hormonal effector mechanisms vary the intake, distribution, and excretion of fluid and electrolytes in accordance with long-term needs. The immediate increase in water intake is caused by altered neural inputs from the vasculature reinforced by increases in circulating ANG II. Circulating ANG II contributes directly to the overall drinking response by stimulating structures in the central nervous system and, if the hypovolemia is severe, it is also important in maintaining the blood pressure and therefore the behavioral competence of the animal. However, it is not essential in hypovolemic thirst that can occur in the absence of circulating ANG II.

C. Arousal of Sodium Appetite

An increase in sodium appetite is the second behavioral response to hypovolemia. Many mammals in sodium deficit seek and ingest salt, driven to do so by increased sodium appetite (122, 498, 523), an innate behavior that serves sodium homeostasis (148). Sodium appetite is also expressed in many birds, including the pigeon. Animals seek and ingest what they like as well as what they need, and much sodium intake is preference driven; for ourselves, table salt is a common condiment, and sodium-replete rats readily accept and drink large quantities of isotonic NaCl, the saline concentration they prefer. Sodium is normally a major urinary constituent and represents the excess of intake over the amounts needed by the body. It is important in the investigation of need-driven sodium appetite to offer concentrations of sodium solutions that the sodium-replete animals normally avoid. Under these conditions, we can be reasonably sure that any NaCl intake is need driven. Sodium appetite is well developed in inland-dwelling herbivores including some primates, particularly during pregnancy and lactation when calls on fluid and electrolyte reserves of the body are greatest, or when sodium deficiency develops as a result of, for example, intestinal infection. Herbivores in the wild may travel long distances to places where salt is to be found, and this is presumably why their predators also tend to congregate at these places. But omnivores, including humans, and carnivores when they are unable to satisfy their sodium needs from their prey, show increased sodium appetite when sodium deficient.

Inducing sodium deficiency by placing the subject on a low-sodium regime is the simplest way to generate an appetite, and of course, here ANG II levels increase. The combination of dietary restriction and enforced sweating was used by McCance (371) in his classical experiments on himself and colleagues, published in 1936, on the effects of inducing sodium chloride deficiency and, although the study of sodium appetite was not the primary purpose of this experiment, the subjects made some interesting observations on alterations in their sense of flavor and taste. In a more recent study, experimental sodium deficiency in 10 human subjects caused increased preference for salty foods (32). More active procedures to make animals sodium deficient, which may be combined with dietary sodium restriction, are treatment with furosemide or other natriuretic drugs (see sect. IXB); peritoneal dialysis with isosmotic glucose; unilateral fistulation of the parotid salivary gland in sheep, calf, and goat (122); and adrenalectomy (see sect. XD). The methods used to arouse hypovolemic thirst also cause increased sodium appetite, and to these may be added subcutaneous injection of buffered Formalin, which is an effective natriorexigenic stimulus (669).

Sodium appetite can also be induced in the absence of need for sodium by administration of the hormones of sodium deficiency, the mineralocorticoids and ANG II, which are normally secreted in extra amounts in the circumstances just mentioned. But to these should be added the hormones of pregnancy and lactation and the stress hormones of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenocortical axis, corticotrophin releasing hormone (CRH), ACTH, and glucocorticoids (122, 597), although these are of varying effectiveness and there are species differences in the effects produced. Angiotensin II-induced sodium appetite is considered in detail in section IV, and the reproductive hormones are considered in sections IIIA4 and IVA3.

Increased sodium appetite caused by mineralocorticoids has been abundantly studied and verified since Richter's discovery of the phenomenon more than 50 years ago (122). A U-shaped function describes the effects of systemic administration of mineralocorticoid on sodium appetite; replacement doses of deoxycorticosterone acetate (DOCA) reverse the increased NaCl intake that follows adrenalectomy, whereas larger than replacement doses of DOCA or aldosterone stimulate NaCl intake in intact and adrenalectomized rats despite the accompanying sodium retention and suppression of renal renin secretion (56, 221, 475, 478, 479, 668). Arousal of sodium appetite depends on central actions of mineralocorticoids. Receptor binding studies have shown that there are two receptor subtypes for corticosteroids, mineralocorticoid (type I or MR), and glucocorticoid (type II or GR). Both are present in rat brain, and their regional distribution is similar. The highest uptakes of aldosterone and corticosterone are in the hippocampus, septum, and amygdala (402), and there is a brief report that bilateral adrenal steroid implants in the amygdala caused an increase in intake of NaCl but not water (472). Central nervous structures involved in increased sodium appetite are discussed in section VI.

Sodium appetite can be aroused in rats by inducing the syndrome of apparent mineralocorticoid excess (AME) using the active component of licorice, glycyrrhizic acid, or its hydrolytic product, 18beta -glycyrrhetinic acid (105, 106). The pattern of increased drinking produced resembles that which occurs after administration of excessive amounts of mineralocorticoid, but plasma corticosteroid levels are not increased. Apparent mineralocorticoid excess has been identified as a cause of human hypertension (529). The clinical picture is similar to that produced by excess mineralocorticoids, with sodium retention, hypertension, potassium loss, and inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system. In type I AME, inactivation of glucocorticoids is impaired because the enzyme 11beta -hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (11beta -OHSD), which oxidises cortisol to cortisone, is congenitally deficient or has been blocked by licorice (557). Type II AME is secondary to a deficiency in the A-ring reduction metabolic pathway. In rats, licorice prevents oxidation of corticosterone, the glucocorticoid in rodents, to 11-dehydrocorticosterone. Failure to inactivate glucocorticoids allows the mineralocorticoid receptors, whose affinities for glucocorticoids and mineralocorticoids in vitro are the same (402), to be powerfully stimulated by the large amounts, relative to aldosterone, of glucocorticoid present. Mineralocorticoid receptors, including those in brain (323), are normally protected from stimulation by glucocorticoids by this enzyme. Licorice inhibits 11beta -OHSD activity in kidney and other tissues, exposing the mineralocorticoid receptors to glucocorticoid stimulation, but the 11-oxoreductase activity of liver is mainly unaffected, ensuring reconversion of inactive 11-ketosteroid to active glucocorticoid (401). Glycyrrhizic acid-induced increases in sodium appetite were abolished by adrenalectomy but could be restored by administration of cortisol or corticosterone but not by replacement dosage of DOCA (107). Increased sodium appetite in AME suggests that 11beta -OHSD inactivation of glucocorticoid also operates in those parts of the brain responsible for mineralocorticoid-induced appetite.

The stimulating effect of DOCA is much smaller in rabbit and sheep, and aldosterone seems ineffective in these species (122). Dogs, hamsters, and gerbils also fail to show significant natriorexigenic responses to mineralocorticoids (498). On the other hand, it has been shown that several adrenal steroids in slow-release pellet form, of which deoxycorticosterone (DOC) was the most potent, evoked sodium appetite in BALB/c mice (45), although it was stated earlier that mice do not show a natriorexigenic response to mineralocorticoids (498, 499). The pigeon develops an increase in sodium appetite in response to subcutaneous DOCA (151). Glucocorticoids can generate sodium appetite in rabbit and sheep but in rat only when accompanied by mineralocorticoid (668). Adrenocorticotrophic hormone (Synacthen) stimulates sodium appetite in rabbit, rat (659), and sheep. In rabbit, the effect is mediated partly by the adrenal cortex, but there is also an extra-adrenal effect, since ACTH has some action in adrenalectomized animals, presumably by acting directly on the brain (122). Mineralocorticoid-induced sodium appetite is a primary natriorexigenic effect on brain; it is independent of and unaffected by the developing "escape" from mineralocorticoid action on the kidney. Corticosteroid therapy, or excessive mineralocorticoid secretion whether accompanied by increases or decreases in circulating ANG II, could contribute to inappropriate or excessive sodium intake in human. Continuing sodium intake in the face of sodium retention indicates that the intake is not homeostatically determined.

Mineralocorticoid treatment, or induction of AME, also causes increased water intake, which is usually regarded as being exclusively secondary to NaCl intake, but some increased intake also occurs when water only is available to drink in dog (164, 461) and rat on a high salt (475, 479) or normal (unpublished data) diet. Furthermore, the relation between water intake and NaCl intake is not always close; in mouse, DOC stimulated NaCl intake but had no effect on water intake, whereas the combination of DOC with other corticosteroids, and especially with ACTH, caused increased water intake as well as NaCl (45). Apart from the osmotic effect of the NaCl intake, increased water intake may be the result of mineralocorticoid-induced potassium depletion giving rise to cellular dehydration and failure of renal concentrating ability. Potassium deficiency has long been recognized as a cause of a diabetes insipidus-like syndrome with polydipsia and vasopressin-resistant polyuria both in animals and in humans. The stimulating effect of potassium depletion on water intake may be primary; the polyuria of hypokalemic subjects is often in excess of the urine volume required by their concentrating defect (39).

Increased sodium appetite is an essential and appropriate defense mechanism against sodium deficiency, but other mineral deficiencies may also cause increased NaCl intake. These are circumstances where the relation between sodium appetite and sodium need and/or its hormonal accompaniments appear to be completely absent. In addition to the polydipsia/polyuria syndrome already mentioned, potassium depletion in rat caused increased intake of NaCl as well as KCl (122). Rats also show increased sodium appetite in response to calcium depletion even in the absence of sodium loss or increases in the hormones of sodium homeostasis. The appetite is not related to plasma calcium levels, the hormones controlling calcium, or the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, and at present it is unexplained (627, 628).

Because ANG II and mineralocorticoids are central in the body's defenses against sodium loss and consequent hypovolemia, much of the experimental effort to try and elucidate the physiological basis of sodium appetite has been devoted to these hormones. One approach to investigate possible participation of renal renin in sodium appetite has been to lower plasma levels of renin and ANG II by bilateral nephrectomy, or to prevent the effects of renin secretion with appropriate renin-angiotensin system antagonists (see sect. V). Another approach has been to try to stimulate or restore sodium appetite by elevating plasma ANG II levels directly or by administering renin, or by stimulating renal renin secretion pharmacologically or surgically. These approaches complement studies on the possible role of cerebral renin in sodium appetite and its relation, if any, to renal renin; they are essentially those used to assess the renin contribution to thirst.

D. Initial Evidence Suggesting Involvement of the Renal Renin-Angiotensin System in Drinking Caused by Hypovolemia

I proposed that the renal renin-angiotensin system has a direct and physiological role in certain types of drinking behavior as a result of certain findings on caval obstruction as a stimulus to drinking in the rat (176, 178). The procedure of caval obstruction was devised as a method of mimicking the circulatory effects of severe hypovolemia. Within 30 min to 1 h after constriction of the abdominal inferior vena cava just above the renal veins, there was an increase in water intake followed much later by an increase in sodium intake; there was also a marked fall in urine flow and electrolyte excretion so that for a time the animal gained weight as it retained fluid. Because this stimulus to thirst was found to be less effective in the nephrectomized rat than in the intact rat, it seemed that renin or some other renal factor released as a result of the reduced venous return to the heart could have been partly responsible for the increased drinking. Making the rat anuric by bilateral ureteric ligation, a procedure which preserves the endocrine function of the kidney, did not prevent caval obstruction-induced drinking. Experimental support for the theory of renal renin involvement in this behavior came with the finding that saline extracts of the renal cortex of rat caused increased drinking especially in nephrectomized rats. The properties of the rat renal extract were found to be similar to those of renin and purified commercial pig renin caused a dose-dependent increase in drinking (178).

The idea that the kidney might contribute to thirst, although not through renin secretion, was proposed by Linazasoro et al. (341). They suggested that when the supply of water to the body is lacking, the kidney liberates a thirst factor that helps the body to resist dehydration. They found that in bilaterally nephrectomized rats that were allowed free access to water, the loss of body weight and fall in water intake that usually occur could be prevented by injecting an extract of pig kidney. Because renin apparently did not have these effects, Jiménez-Díaz et al. (288) concluded that the renal thirst factor is not renin. However, there were already clues that the renal thirst factor might indeed be renin. In a series of experiments on accelerated hypertensive disease in nephrectomized dogs (368) and rats (367), Masson and co-workers found that the syndrome was intensified by renin, which stimulated water intake. But they considered that increased drinking was secondary to hypovolemia consequent on increased capillary transudation and they stated that ". . . thirst induced by renin in nephrectomized rats is not the result of primary stimulation of thirst centers . . ." (367). Asscher and Anson (17) came to a similar conclusion, finding that renal extracts stimulated water intake in nephrectomized rats, but attributing this to hypovolemia caused by leakage of fluid into the tissues.

Because the caval obstruction experiments described above suggested that there are occasions when endogenously released renin as opposed to injected renin or renal extracts contributes to thirst, it seemed likely that renin acted by more physiological mechanisms than by causing or exacerbating hypovolemia. The question now arose whether, as for other effects of renin, increased drinking in response to caval obstruction was mediated by ANG II (178). This proved to be the case. It was found that ANG II caused increased drinking when infused intravenously into water-replete rats at doses below those which produced marked changes in hematocrit value and that it restored the nephrectomized rat's reduced water intake in response to caval obstruction near to that of a normal rat's response (200). In an investigation of norepinephrine-induced eating in rat, it had been observed that intrahypothalamic injection of ANG II caused drinking (51). It was now shown that injection of small amounts of ANG II into the anterior hypothalamus and preoptic region caused dose-dependent increases in water intake in the water-replete rat (149), suggesting that increased circulating ANG II caused drinking by acting on accessible structures in the central nervous system. Shortly after these early experiments on ANG II-induced water intake, intracranial ANG II was also shown to cause increased NaCl intake (72, 96).

E. The Question of Whether Angiotensins Originating in Brain and Other Tissues Are Involved in Drinking Behavior

The possible involvement of angiotensin peptides generated in the central nervous system in thirst and sodium appetite raises complicated issues that have yet to be resolved. These are discussed at length in section VII. There is evidence that central angiotensinergic pathways participate in hypovolemic drinking behavior, especially in NaCl intake. There is also evidence that they may be involved in the thirst of cellular dehydration. However, the ways and circumstances in which angiotensin peptides generated in situ in the brain might perform these functions, and the relation between angiotensins of central and peripheral origin are generally unknown.

Reninlike enzymes and other elements essential for the generation of angiotensin peptides are present in many other tissues as well as in brain and kidney. Ovarian and uterine renin-angiotensin systems perhaps could be involved in the heightened responsiveness of females to some dipsogenic stimuli (see sect. IIIA4) and to the increased intakes of water and NaCl during pregnancy and lactation. However, these possibilities have not been explored, and there are other factors that could be more important. Another tissue renin difference between the sexes is the exceptionally high content of salivary renin in male mice compared with female animals, but again, the physiological significance of this is unknown.

F. Comment

Hypovolemia is a more immediate threat to life than cellular dehydration so that mechanisms for the preservation and restoration of circulatory volume are vital for survival. The temporary respite afforded by the immediate reflex responses of the heart and blood vessels to loss of blood is rapidly consolidated by mobilization of interstitial fluid and by increased water intake followed by increased sodium intake, leading to restoration of circulating volume. The threshold blood loss for arousing hypovolemic thirst is ~8-10% compared with a threshold of 1-2% loss of cell water for osmotic thirst. The higher threshold for hypovolemic thirst reflects the huge range of blood flows required to match the variations in metabolic demands by the tissues with the general circulatory adjustments that these entail. The large volume of interstitial fluid acts as a buffer that can be mobilized to maintain the circulation as the need arises. When hypovolemia becomes persistent and a threat to survival, drinking is as vigorous as that caused by equivalent cellular dehydration. The role of increased renal renin secretion in hypovolemia is to reinforce the hemodynamic, renal, dipsogenic, and natriorexigenic responses to loss of circulating volume, especially when the fluid deficit is large and developing rapidly. Angiotensin peptides may also be generated in brain and elsewhere and could play a part in the increased thirst and sodium appetite of hypovolemia and perhaps in the altered fluid needs of reproduction, but the position is much less certain than it is for renal renin. Even in the case of renal renin, increased secretion is not essential for dipsogenic or natriorexigenic responses to hypovolemia, and it is not easy to measure its contribution. The rest of this review is devoted to detailed consideration of the physiological mechanisms and significance of thirst and sodium appetite induced by angiotensin peptides.

    III. ANGIOTENSIN-INDUCED THIRST
Top
Previous
Next
References

One of the most striking stimulatory effects of any substance on any motivated behavior is the vigorous, short-latency burst of drinking that follows injection of ANG II into sensitive structures in the brain. The initial increase in water intake is followed by a developing increase in NaCl intake (see sect. IV). Systemic injection of ANG II also causes water-replete animals to start drinking, although the response is less predictable than after intracranial administration. Responsiveness to the dipsogenic effect of ANG II is present in all vertebrate groups examined (Table 1), including certain euryhaline bony fish, but excluding amphibians and elasmobranch fish. Renin and some other components of the renin-angiotensin cascade given by intracranial or systemic injection also cause increased drinking.

 
View this table:
[in this window] [in a new window]
 
TABLE 1.   Species that have been shown to drink water or sodium solutions in response to ANG II and other renin-angiotensin components given by intracranial or systemic injection or infusion

A. Angiotensin-Induced Water Intake in Rat

The greater part of experimental work on ANG II-induced drinking has been carried out on the laboratory rat. Most rat strains respond vigorously to the dipsogenic and natriorexigenic effects of ANG II.

1. Intracranial administration

The effect of ANG II on drinking is most obvious after intracranial administration. Angiotensin II-sensitive neurons for drinking, identified electrophysiologically, are present in the ventral lamina terminalis, certain of the circumventricular organs (CVOs), and limbic structures; these regions contain immunoreactive neurons and binding sites for ANG II. The detailed neuroanatomy of ANG II-induced drinking is dealt with in section VI. When ANG II is administered by intracranial injection through a permanently connected remote injection system so that the rat does not have to be disturbed by handling during the injection, the animal stops whatever it is doing, goes to the source of water, and starts to drink, usually <1 min after injection, and within 10-15 min will have consumed significant amounts of water (
149, 527, 537). To the onlooker, the behavior appears entirely normal and indistinguishable from that produced by other potent thirst-inducing stimuli. Increased water intake precedes any significant increase in urine flow. For most purposes, it makes little difference whether ANG II is introduced by bolus injection or by slow infusion, directly into brain parenchyma or into cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), but drinking in response to bilateral injections of ANG II into the preoptic area (POA) was more robust and occurred at lower doses than to unilateral injections (476). Obviously, there will be differences in the tissue affected and the concentration of hormone reaching the particular tissue that may need to be taken into account when comparing dose-response relations or apparently contradictory results from different laboratories.

Drinking proceeds with few interruptions and is dose dependent in the femtomole to nanomole range of ANG II; typically, doses in the range of 1-100 pmol (1-100 ng) in an injection volume of 1 µl are used. The threshold dose for the water-replete rat is ~0.1-1.0 fmol injected into the SFO (Fig. 2) or OVLT, two of the most sensitive structures to the dipsogenic action of ANG II (see sect. VI). The response is mediated by AT1 receptors (see sect. V). The quantities of water drunk are large. A male Wistar rat will drink ~10-15 ml water, after a latency measured in seconds, within 10-15 min of injecting 10 pmol ANG II into the anterior third ventricle. If the rat is prevented from drinking, it remains thirsty for up to ~90 min after this dose, although the amounts drunk when access is finally allowed decline with time (488). Even after the largest doses, drinking is largely completed within ~15 min. After larger doses of ANG II, the amounts of water consumed may exceed the amounts that the animal would drink in 24 h in the course of its normal day-to-day activities. Despite the immediate intake of water after intracranial ANG II, overnight intake is well-maintained. Continuous intracranial infusions of ANG II elicit even higher intakes than these; individual rats infused with ANG II at rates of 10 pmol/h may have 24-h fluid intakes that exceed their body weights.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.   Water intake in 15 min after injection of angiotensin (ANG) II in subfornical organ (SFO) or in adjacent lateral ventricle (LV) or third ventricle (3V). Numerator in each fraction is number of rats responding, and denominator is number of animals injected at particular dose and injection site. [From Simpson et al. (537).]

Drinking behavior induced by quite moderate amounts of ANG II seems highly motivated. After 50 pmol ANG II injected into the lateral POA, rats pressed a lever as many as 64 times for a single reward of 0.1 ml water; the animals worked as hard for water as when they had been deprived of water for 24 h (489). After ANG II, a hungry rat stops eating, a curious rat stops exploring, a somnolent rat bestirs itself, and in each case the animal drinks after a short latency. A 10-ng dose of ANG II injected into the lateral POA induced drinking and suppressed feeding in 24-h food-deprived rats, but the suppression of feeding was completely prevented by a 15-ml intragastric preload of water or 0.9% NaCl, although drinking was only partly reduced and less so after 0.9% NaCl than after water (490). Systemic administration is dealt with later in this section, but it may be noted here that subcutaneous injection of ANG II caused rats to reduce their voluntary consumption of alcohol and drink water instead (247). It was suggested that ANG II might serve as a satiety signal in alcohol drinking.

Intracranial ANG II or renin (see sect. VC) also increased the amounts of water drunk in response to intraperitoneal hypertonic NaCl, a cellular dehydration stimulus to thirst, or to intraperitoneal hyperoncotic polyethylene glycol, a hypovolemic stimulus to thirst (180). Drinking in response to intracranial injection of ANG II or renin can be elicited in bilaterally adrenalectomized or hypophysectomized rats (22), or in bilaterally nephrectomized rats (20). It is therefore a primary effect, not dependent on pituitary or adrenal hormones and not the consequence of increased urinary fluid loss. However, rats pretreated with dexamethasone 3-6 h previously drank more water in response to lateral ventricular (or intraperitoneal) injection of ANG II, although ANG II binding in the brain was unaffected by dexamethasone (227).

In intact rats, intracranial injection of ANG II causes a rise in blood pressure mainly attributable to increased sympathetic nerve activity, but also to vasopressin release and resetting of the baroreceptor reflex (185, 449, 527, 553). The pressor and dipsogenic effects are separable in onset and duration. Angiotensin II infused into the lateral cerebral ventricle at 6 µg/h for 7 days led to transient dipsogenic and natriuretic responses but a sustained rise in blood pressure (130). The acute pressor response may attenuate intracranial ANG II-induced drinking. In rats in which endogenous ANG II formation was prevented by ACE blockade (see sect. IXC), the dipsogenic effect of an infusion of ANG II into the lateral ventricle was enhanced by simultaneous reduction in arterial blood pressure with intravenous minoxidil despite the increased fluid and electrolyte retention caused by the hypotension (617). The modulatory effect of alterations in arterial blood pressure on intracranial ANG II-induced drinking can occur in the absence of sinoaortic baroreceptor input. In ACE-blockaded rats, water intake was found to be inversely related to changes in arterial pressure caused by intravenous phenylephrine or minoxidil (620). This relation was still present after denervation but, as the authors pointed out, the failure of sinoaortic denervation to eliminate the modulatory effect of changes in blood pressure on ANG II-induced drinking occurred in the presence of the greater changes in mean arterial pressure produced by phenylephrine or minidoxil in denervated rats, i.e., after sinoaortic denervation drinking responses may have became partly refractory to the modulatory effects of changes in arterial pressure. This could mean that loss of baroreceptor function was having some effect. Clearly, volume receptor information from the vagally innervated atrial and cardiopulmonary receptors not affected by the sinoaortic denervation could have continued to modify drinking behavior. Pressure inhibition of drinking is further discussed next and in section IIIB2.

2. Systemic administration

An increase in drinking can also be produced by systemic administration of ANG II or its precursors, or by causing release of renin from the kidney by pharmacological or surgical means (see sects. IX and X). Although it is difficult to make direct comparisons because the techniques of administration are so different, the conditions required for eliciting drinking in response to systemic ANG II are more exacting than those for intracranial administration. With the use of appropriate doses to obtain maximal responses by the two routes, drinking responses caused by intravenous infusion are generally smaller than those following intracranial administration. In contrast to the robust drinking response that is almost invariably obtained with intracranial ANG II, there are well-documented cases in the literature where systemic ANG II has failed to cause drinking.

Angiotension II is usually given by continuous intravenous infusion to unrestrained animals using an external infusion system (0.05-3.0 µg·kg-1·min-1; Ref.
200) or an implanted osmotic minipump. Subcutaneous (up to 500 µg; Ref. 291) or intraperitoneal (5-30 µg/100 g; Ref. 312) administration has also been used, but large doses of ANG II must be given. Intravenous ANG II was an effective stimulus to drinking on its own in water-replete rats, producing dose-dependent increases in water intake, the increases being greater in nephrectomized animals; combined with hypertonic NaCl, it caused a nephrectomized rat to drink and retain more water than after NaCl alone (200). The responsiveness of nephrectomized rats indicates that drinking was not secondary to increased urinary losses, although these may well have partly accounted for increased drinking after larger infusion rates in intact animals. As well as being the source of renal renin, the kidney is an important pathway of elimination of prorenin, renin, and angiotensins (556), and this must be one of the factors accounting for the enhanced responsiveness of nephrectomized rats compared with intact animals. The increases were not mediated by increased adrenal secretion because acutely adrenalectomized nephrectomized rats drank similar amounts of water as nephrectomized rats in response to intravenous ANG II, but dexamethasone given 3-6 h previously does cause extra drinking in response to intraperitoneal (or intracranial) ANG II (227). In the longer term after adrenalectomy, ANG II levels may decline (see sect. XD), resulting in upregulation of receptors that could lead to increased drinking in response to intravenous ANG II. Although there is no evidence to support this, drinking responses to intravenous ANG II and isoproterenol (see sect. IXA) were greater in rats hypophysectomized 3 wk previously than in normal rats (7). It was suggested that the CVOs (see sect. VIB) become hyperresponsive to circulating ANG II because of upregulation of angiotensin receptors owing to lower levels of ANG II in hypophysectomized rats.

In intact rats, the minimal intravenous infusion rate needed to initiate drinking was ~25 pmol·kg-1·min-1 (273), which would have produced plasma ANG II levels in the region of 200 fmol/ml (Fig. 3) (355). This rate is comparable to the minimum effective rate of infusion of 50 pmol·kg-1·min-1 in two other studies (19, 200). In another experiment on rats, plasma ANG II levels at thirst threshold were found to be ~460 pg/ml, similar to the plasma ANG II levels after ~48 h of water deprivation (634). These values are comparable to those needed to initiate drinking in dogs (see sect. IIIB). However, in one investigation where ANG II was infused intravenously at 10, 30, and 60 ng/min acutely or for 3-day periods, no significant effect on water intake was observed; the highest rate of infusion produced a plasma ANG II of ~1,500 pg/ml at 1 h (439). Furthermore, ANG II did not enhance drinking caused by water deprivation, hypertonic NaCl, or hypotension.


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.   Regression of plasma ANG II concentrations after intravenous infusion of ANG II at 1, 25, 50, or 100 pmol·kg-1·min-1 for 60 min in nephrectomized rats. Plasma ANG II levels produced by various thirst stimuli in other rats are indicated by arrows on regression line. Top shaded area represents plasma ANG II level at dipsogenic threshold for intravenous ANG II, and bottom shaded area is range of controls. Intact 25 and 100 pmol·kg-1· min-1 indicates level of circulating ANG II after a 60-min infusion into unanesthetized rats with intact kidneys. DI, diabetes insipidus; RH, renal hypertension; PEG, polyethylene glycol; Isop, isoproterenol. [From Mann et al. (355).]

The lack of dipsogenic responsiveness to intravenous ANG II that is sometimes encountered could be partly explained by the acute pressor response to ANG II. In an important series of experiments where the effect of the increase in blood pressure on ANG II-induced drinking was investigated, it was found that ANG II infused intravenously by itself at 100 ng/min caused no drinking but did so when the rise in blood pressure was prevented by isoproterenol, diazoxide, or minoxidil; rats were pretreated with captopril to block endogenous formation of ANG II (157, 483, 484). Lower rates of infusion (16.7 and 50 ng/min) on their own caused significant increases in water intake, but the responses were enhanced as much as fivefold when the pressor response was prevented and at the same time urinary fluid losses were reduced. Possible mechanisms for the pressor inhibition of systemic ANG II-induced drinking have been demonstrated in the dog (see sect. IIIB2). There may be other reasons for the relative ineffectiveness of systemic as opposed to intracranial administration of ANG II, such as accessibility of ANG II-sensitive tissue to blood-borne hormone, and there are also important species differences.

As will become evident when sodium appetite is considered, there are differences in the drinking behavior produced by systemic and intracranial administration of ANG II, but it is difficult to make direct comparisons between effects produced by hormone reaching accessible tissue in the bloodstream and effects produced by injection of a small volume of peptide in very high concentration into a restricted part of a large sensitive region in the brain, not all of which is necessarily accessible to blood-borne hormone. With intracranial injections in particular, other angiotensinergic functions may be aroused that could modify the ANG II drinking response. Further complications are the side effects, such as the changes in blood pressure or in water and electrolyte excretion produced by the hormone, whether given by the intracranial or systemic route, or by the procedure used to release renal renin, which may interfere with or modify the drinking response. Notwithstanding these problems, there appear to be differences both in the nature and in the apparent sensitivity of the responses to ANG II by the two routes. Intracranial administration causes an immediate and substantial increase in water intake followed by an increase in NaCl intake. The increase in water intake after systemic administration is usually smaller, the phenomenon is less robust, and unless special measures are taken, there appears to be no direct effect of systemic ANG II on sodium appetite in rats.

3. Strain differences

Animals of the same strain, age, body weight, and sex show considerable individual variation in spontaneous water intake and sodium preference. The spontaneous water intake of rats may vary by a factor of more than two on a standard diet, most of the water being taken in association with feeding (
196), and observations in humans, dogs, and many other animal species show that there may be huge differences in amounts drunk by different individuals in the same circumstances. These differences do not appear to be secondary to variations in the effectiveness of renal control of the body fluids between individuals, and large drinkers have no difficulty in maintaining fluid balance on smaller intakes.

It is also well-established that there may be marked differences in drinking behavior, both spontaneous and in response to dipsogenic and natriorexigenic challenges (effects on sodium appetite are further considered in sect. IVA3), including ANG II, between different strains of laboratory rat. The spontaneous water intake of male Fischer 344 rats was one-half that of age-matched Sprague-Dawley rats, and the water-to-food ratio was ~30% lower (497). After subcutaneous or intravenous ANG II, the water intake of Fischer 344 rats was the same as that of Sprague-Dawley rats, but their response to isoproterenol, a partly angiotensin-dependent stimulus (see sect. IXA), was considerably less, although in a later study (91) water intake and increases in plasma renin after isoproterenol did not apparently differ between strains. Compared with Wistar rats, the Fischer 344 rat has a higher baseline plasma renin activity, increased urinary arginine vasopressin, decreased urine flow, and diminished thirst (408).

Hypertensive strains of rat produced by selective breeding for high blood pressure may show differences in both water and NaCl intakes compared with normotensive controls. In a comparison between Dahl inbred Sprague-Dawley rats selected for sensitivity or resistance to the development of hypertension when fed a high-salt diet, both strains drank similar amounts of water after subcutaneous ANG I or II, but the salt-sensitive strain had lower plasma renin activity and drank less after isoproterenol, ACE inhibitors (see sect. IXC) and induction of hypovolemia with polyethylene glycol (see sect. XC) than the salt-resistant strain (500). Rats of another hypertensive strain, the Wistar-Kyoto spontaneously hypertensive strain (SH), showed enhanced baseline preference for NaCl solutions and higher baseline water intakes and higher water to food ratios than the normotensive Wistar-Kyoto controls (WK) (122, 320). In response to subcutaneous ANG II, histamine, or hypertonic NaCl, SH rats were found to drink more water than WK rats. According to one set of findings, the greater intracranial ANG II pressor response of SH rats compared with WK rats was not matched by any differences in intracranial ANG II-induced water intake and vasopressin release (267). However, others have found that intracranial ANG II caused larger water intakes in SH rats than in Sprague-Dawley or WK rats (187, 680). In experiments where SH and WK rats were allowed access to NaCl solutions (0.9, 1.8, and 2.7%) and water, SH rats drank more NaCl and water than WK rats in response to injections of ANG II into the third ventricle and more water than WK rats in response to third ventricular injections of carbachol (187). They also drank significantly more 1.8% NaCl than WK rats in response to systemic captopril (see sect. IXC). On the face of it, the view that mechanisms of thirst and sodium appetite in SH rats are more responsive than in WK rats is supported, but this heightened responsiveness applies to both water and NaCl, and it does not seem to be confined to angiotensin-dependent challenges. The part played by angiotensin peptides formed in the brain in accounting for SH/WK differences is considered in section VII, B and C.

But the meaning of differences in drinking behavior between SH and WK rats is uncertain because the differences are as well explained by smaller responses in WK rats as by excessive responses in SH rats. Neither SH nor WK rats can be assumed to be fully inbred and uniform strains. It is probable that many genetic characteristics that are not directly responsible for the increase in blood pressure differ between the substrains depending on their source. For example, within genetic strains of hypertensive rat, high blood pressure can be dissociated from NaCl intake. There is, therefore, considerable biological variation and genetic heterogeneity in SH and WK strains bred in different laboratories, although it is likely that animals selected for hypertension are more homogeneous than the normotensive WK rats with which they are being compared. An illustration of this heterogeneity is the variation in plasma and tissue ACE activity in SH and WK rats from different breeding sources (387).

Results in the Brattleboro rat show that marked differences in drinking behavior between strains do not necessarily indicate genetic differences in thirst mechanisms. The Brattleboro rat, derived from a strain of Long-Evans hooded rat, possesses an autosomal recessive trait at a single gene locus which results in a defect in vasopressin synthesis (517). Accordingly, it drinks large quantities of water throughout the day and night to compensate for the greatly increased urinary fluid losses. When allowance is made for the increased water turnover, it appears that the thirst mechanisms are responding normally to the increased need for water (223, 224). What quantitative differences there are seem to fall within the range of what might be expected from using different but normal rat strains. The Brattleboro rat is discussed in section XI.

4. Sex differences and sex hormones

An intriguing sex difference is the presence of a renin-like enzyme in much higher concentrations in the salivary glands of male mice than in females. The purification of mouse salivary gland renin was critical in the development of methods for the purification of renal renin (
453). The high levels of salivary gland renin in the male fall after castration but can be restored by treating the mice with testosterone. Sodium depletion resulted in increased renin expression in kidney, heart, and adrenals, but not in the submaxillary gland or testis (135). Purified mouse submaxillary gland renin is an exceptionally potent stimulus to thirst and sodium appetite in rat when injected into the medial POA (21) (see sect. VC), but because salivary renin does not appear to be released into the bloodstream by experimentally produced hypotension or renin-angiotensin blockade with ACE inhibitors (422), procedures that result in renal renin release and increased drinking, its possible role in the control of drinking behavior, if any, is difficult to imagine.

Reproduction in the female imposes heavy demands on the body fluids to meet the needs of the developing fetus in utero and to support lactation after parturition. Pregnancy and lactation lead to large increases in intakes of water and sodium (and calcium) salts, but there are also other differences in drinking behavior between males and nonpregnant females, which presumably depend on the different sex hormones. Effects on sodium appetite are considered in section IVA3. Subcutaneous ANG II caused more drinking in female rats than in male rats, and this difference was still present in rats gonadectomized in adulthood, but males and females gonadectomized at birth, and females androgenized at birth, drank similar amounts of water after ANG II (640). When gonadectomized in adulthood, ovariectomized rats also drank more water than castrated male rats in response to polyethylene glycol-induced hypovolemia (639). These and other findings suggest that early hormonally mediated organizational changes in the brain could be responsible for differences between the sexes in drinking behavior in rat.

In addition to possible effects on early development, ovarian hormones have more direct effects on drinking behavior in the nonpregnant state. Spontaneous drinking shows cyclical variation with the different phases of the menstrual and estrous cycles, water intakes being higher after ovulation. In women, osmotic thresholds for the onset of thirst and vasopressin release were lower in the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle (644). In rats, spontaneous drinking and increased drinking induced by injection of ANG II into the POA or subcutaneous injection of isoproterenol were less at proestrus and estrus than at other stages of the cycle (167). The rate of release of immunoreactive ANG II into the CSF also varies, being significantly greater in proestrus than during diestrus (233), which might be another factor accounting for the diminished response to intracranial ANG II at this time. Sodium chloride intake also shows a sharp decline during estrus (122). Not all kinds of drinking behavior are affected; drinking induced by POA carbachol (see sect. VIIIA) or subcutaneous hypertonic NaCl did not show cyclical variations. The variations in spontaneous water intake and in ANG II-induced water intakes at different stages of the estrous cycle were not present in prepubertal females, and they disappeared after ovariectomy in adult rats, so ovarian hormones are probably responsible.

Intramuscular estradiol benzoate or testosterone proprionate reduced the amounts of water drunk by ovariectomized rats in response to polyethylene glycol-induced hypovolemia but had no effect in castrated male rats (639). Subcutaneous estrogen treatment of ovariectomized rats for 7 wk resulted in decreased drinking in response to intraperitoneal injection of ANG II or subcutaneous injection of isoproterenol (220). In acute experiments, intramuscular injection of estradiol benzoate caused a large decrease in spontaneous water intake but a marked increase in isoproterenol-induced drinking, and no effect on hypertonic NaCl-induced drinking (167). Combined treatment with estradiol and progesterone caused an even larger decrease in spontaneous water intake, although isoproterenol-induced drinking was little affected. Central administration of estrogen also produces effects on drinking that depend on sex and the dipsogenic stimulus. Estradiol benzoate injected into the anterior third ventricle of ovariectomized rats resulted in decreased responsiveness to the dipsogenic effects of intracerebroventricular ANG II but not to intracerebroventricular carbachol or subcutaneous hypertonic NaCl (295). Pressor responses to intracranial injection of ANG II, carbachol, or hypertonic NaCl were also attenuated by intracranial estradiol. Systemic estradiol caused a reduction in ANG II receptor binding in brain structures such as the MnPO nucleus, OVLT, and SFO (see sect. VI) implicated in the central actions of ANG II (296). The inhibitory effect of central estradiol was found only in female rats and did not occur in intact or castrated adult male rats. The sex specificity of the inhibitory effect of estrogens depends on sexual differentiation in the brain. Neonatal androgenization of females prevented the inhibitory effect of estradiol on drinking in adulthood, whereas adult males that had undergone neonatal castration tended to decrease their drinking after estradiol treatment. Therefore, estrogen inhibition seems to be sex specific and to affect thirst of extracellular origin, including ANG II-induced drinking, more than thirst of cellular origin, although there are some inconsistencies that may depend on dosage or the duration of estrogen treatment. Systemic estrogen treatment was also inhibitory to sodium appetite caused by sodium deprivation in rat, but there may be species differences since it was found to be stimulatory in the rabbit (see sect. IVA3).

The increases in intakes of water and NaCl to match the increased fluid demands of reproduction are brought about by many hormones the secretion of which increases during pregnancy and lactation. Increases in plasma renin derived from the kidneys and possibly from extrarenal sources such as the pregnant uterus and ovaries interact with estrogen-induced increases in plasma angiotensinogen, resulting in increases in plasma ANG II and aldosterone. This is presumably a long-term effect of estrogen that counters the inhibitory effect just described and suggests that multiple mechanisms are involved in estrogen actions. Stimulation of the renin-angiotensin system in pregnancy is an adaptive response that helps to maintain the blood pressure in the face of increased vasodilatation in pregnancy (18). Angiotensin II, prolactin, relaxin, ACTH, and corticosteroids may all contribute to the increased fluid intake.

Intramuscular injection of prolactin causes thirst and sometimes increased sodium appetite in human volunteers (184). Intravenous injection of ovine prolactin caused neither increased drinking nor a change in urine flow in normal water-replete male and female rats, but prolactin augmented water intake in response to 48-h water deprivation or intraperitoneal polyethylene glycol (301). It also acted synergistically with a subthreshold intraperitoneal dose of ANG II to cause a significant increase in water intake and fluid retention. Intravenous hypertonic NaCl-induced drinking was unaffected by prolactin. When ANG II was infused intravenously into male rats made chronically hyperprolactinemic by anterior pituitary implants taken from female rats, water intake was greater and the threshold to drinking lower than in control rats (302). The action of prolactin to produce increased drinking in response to extracellular fluid deficits and ANG II is physiologically appropriate because loss of isotonic milk during lactation is a threat to circulatory homeostasis.

The ovarian hormone relaxin is moderately dipsogenic. Relaxin is related to insulin-like growth factors, and it may share a common ancestral peptide with insulin. It is secreted by the ovary and placenta, and it may play a role in the increased sodium appetite of late pregnancy when levels are high (122). Injection of relaxin into the anterior third ventricle caused water-replete male and female rats with access to water and NaCl to drink moderate amounts of water but little NaCl within 1 h of injection; insulin did not have this effect (575, 608). Relaxin retained its weak stimulatory action on water intake in DOCA-treated rats but did not cause any further increase in the already increased baseline NaCl intake (203). The pressor and dipsogenic effects of intracranial injection of porcine relaxin were completely blocked by infusion of saralasin into the lateral cerebral ventricle of the rat, which suggests involvement of angiotensinergic pathways in the brain in this response (438, 575). Fos immunoreactivity (see sect. VIA) after injection of human or rat relaxin into the lateral ventricle has been found in regions of the hypothalamus and lamina terminalis that are associated with cardiovascular and body fluid regulation and oxytocin secretion, with high levels in the SFO, OVLT, MnPO nucleus, SON, and PVN (375). But the detailed distribution of Fos-like immunoreactivity resembled more that induced by hypertonicity than by intracranial or systemic injections of ANG II so that relation between relaxin-induced drinking and ANG II requires further study.

5. Ontogeny of angiotensin-induced drinking

In the rat, the mechanisms responsible for the different drinking and feeding behaviors make their first appearance abruptly and in sequence at critical ages. The newborn rat cannot be made to drink water in response to any known stimulus to thirst, but drinking can be induced by cellular dehydration at 3 days, by hypovolemia at 5 days, and by isoproterenol at 6 days (
665). Angiotensin II-induced drinking undergoes a similar ontogenetic progression. Drinking in response to intracranial ANG II appears at 2 days, but at this stage milk and water are not distinguished one from the other. By 8 days, the adult response has appeared with pups drinking more water than milk in response to intracranial ANG II (147). Drinking in response to intracranial ANG II is dose dependent, and at 5 days, the threshold dose is 0.1-1.0 ng, which is comparable to ANG II sensitivity of the adult (389). Angiotensin II is formed in brain cells during embryonic life (506). Early expression of both AT1 and AT2 receptor subtypes in fetal brain and evidence of the trophic effects of angiotensin peptides suggest that angiotensin systems may play a role in brain development. The predominant receptor in fetal brain is the AT2 subtype, and because in the periphery some effects on cell differentiation and development are mediated by the AT2 receptors, it is conceivable that this may also be true in the central nervous system.

Sodium appetite develops at an early age in rat and can be demonstrated in 12-day-old pups depleted of sodium by adrenalectomy or furosemide (393). Intracranial renin caused 3-day-old rat pups to increase their NaCl intake in preference to milk (338). Intracranial ANG II or subcutaneous aldosterone caused increased intakes of 4.0% NaCl in preweanling rat pups at 12 days (603). Enhancement of ANG II-induced NaCl intake by aldosterone seen in adult rats (see sect. IVA1) was absent at this stage but present in 17-day-old preweanling pups. These results were taken to mean that the neural mechanisms for synergy between ANG II and mineralocorticoids mature later than those mediating the individual actions of the two hormones on sodium appetite. It could also mean that the mechanisms for the natriorexigenic action of the two hormones go on maturing after their first appearance.

The early stages in the development of drinking behavior reflect the phylogenetic progression from the relatively simple behavior of reflex drinking in fish to the much more complex sequence of behavior in terrestrial animals, which must seek and find water before being able to consume it. The adult separation of feeding and drinking is absent in neonate rats which do not discriminate between milk and water. Nevertheless, rat pups develop thirst mechanisms at a time when they are still entirely dependent on their mother's milk and before they have need of such mechanisms because milk supplied through suckling ensures the pup's hydration as well as its nourishment. Rat pups exhibiting thirst at this early stage in their life lap and swallow, repeatedly opening their mouths to do so, a quite different motor pattern from that of suckling. The neural mechanisms for thirst and the act of drinking are therefore inborn. This is true for chicks (569) as well as for rats (665). The strain differences in a single species like the rat are products of that animal's genome and are preformed in the brain. These differences probably do not depend to any important extent on postnatal experience of dehydration for their appearance, although it is possible that minor modifications may depend on a particular individual's experience. This may apply more to salt than to water, where learning based on experience of previous sodium excess or deficiency may play a larger part. This experience may be intrauterine. For example, the offspring of pregnant rats subjected to hyperoncotic dialysis (see sect. XC), which is known to increase sodium appetite, showed an increase in sodium appetite compared with the offspring of untreated dams (420). Similarly, female rats made hypertensive by partial aortic ligation that also causes increased intakes of water and NaCl (see sect. XF) showed increased sodium preference in adulthood compared with the offspring of normotensive mothers (638). Sodium concentrations in the maternal plasma and amniotic fluid were unaltered but were increased in milk, and this may have been the factor responsible for the increased sodium preference, although it is possible that undiscovered intrauterine factors may also have been significant. Clearly, after weaning, learning where water and salt are to be found becomes important for a terrestrial animal, but the urge to drink and the motor mechanisms for its successful accomplishment are already present.

B. Angiotensin-Induced Water Intake in Other Mammals

In addition to the rat, most of the dozen or so mammals that have been investigated show short-latency drinking responses to ANG II. Intravenous ANG II may cause increased thirst in humans. Eutherian mammals that have been found to drink water in response to intracranial or systemic administration of ANG II include dog, cat, baboon, rhesus monkey, goat, cow, sheep, pig, flying fox, guinea pig, chipmunk, hamster, and gerbil; the response of rabbit is much less certain, and in mouse, increased water intake is secondary to a slowly developing increase in sodium intake. Metatherian mammals that have been tested and found responsive to ANG II are the North American opossum and the Australian brush-tailed possum.

1. Intracranial administration

In mongrel dogs, intracranial injection of 1-5,000 pmol ANG II caused vigorous, short-latency, dose-dependent drinking, largely completed within 15 min of injection and producing water intakes exceeding 400 ml by 1 h after the highest dose injected into the most sensitive sites (
183, 194, 463). Also responsive to intracranial ANG II (Table 2) are cat (60, 102, 573, 574), baboon (347), rhesus monkey (412, 526, 530, 536), goat (10, 11, 12, 606), cow (46, 47), sheep (655, 657, 658), pig (25, 411), and Syrian hamster (474). Short-latency drinking in response to intracranial ANG II has been found in the Mongolian gerbil (50, 679), and interestingly, gerbils maintained on fresh lettuce instead of water engage in prolonged bouts of lettuce eating after ANG II (50).

 
View this table:
[in this window] [in a new window]
 
TABLE 2.   Intracranial injection sites and effective dipsogenic doses of ANG II given by bolus injection or continuous infusion

In short-term experiments, injection of ANG II into the third ventricle of briefly anesthetized mice did not cause any increase in water intake after the animal had recovered from the anesthetic (404). However, when ANG II was given by infusion into the third ventricle over many days to mice offered water and 0.3 M NaCl to drink, there were large increases in intakes of water and NaCl (123). In contrast to the short-latency responses seen in most other mammals, the increase in water intake took 24-48 h to develop and ran in parallel with the striking increase in NaCl intake (see sect. IV), making it likely that it was secondary to the NaCl intake. Reports that the rabbit responds to preoptic and septal injections of ANG II (183) and that infusion of ANG II or III into the lateral ventricle causes delayed increases in daily water intake (169, 170, 681) should be contrasted with other experiments on wild and New Zealand rabbits (125, 168, 598, 599), in which no effect of intracranial ANG II on water intake could be demonstrated. However, after several days of infusion into the lateral ventricle, NaCl intake was increased (598), and experiments with an ACE inhibitor also suggest that ANG II may be involved in drinking in the rabbit (see sect. IXC1). Injection of ANG II into the third ventricle of a metatherian mammal, the North American opossum, elicited dose-dependent drinking, but the threshold dipsogenic dose was much larger than in the more responsive eutherian mammals (140, 165).

2. Systemic administration

Raising the level of ANG II in the bloodstream causes drinking in many species of eutherian and metatherian mammals, although, as in the rat, intracranial administration is generally more effective. Intravenous infusion of ANG II is dipsogenic in some men (
454), and from the results of experiments on monkey, it is probable that humans are also sensitive to intracranial ANG II. The responsiveness of monkey to systemic ANG II is unknown.

The mongrel dog was highly responsive to the dipsogenic action of ANG II infused intravenously or through the carotid arteries at rates that produced plasma ANG II levels comparable to those that occur in moderate dehydration or sodium deficiency and similar to those needed to stimulate drinking in rats. During intravenous infusion of ANG II at 13 ng·kg-1·min-1 over 10 days, the daily amounts of water drunk by mongrel dogs of either sex more than doubled compared with the periods before and after the infusion (629). In experiments lasting up to 2 h in which drinking responses to intravenous infusions of ANG II (125, 250, 500, and 1,000 pmol/min) and other components of the renin-angiotensin system (see sect. V) were examined, it was established that ANG II caused short-latency drinking in mongrel dogs and bitches in water balance and that it was a more effective dipsogen than tetradecapeptide (TDP) renin substrate, ANG I, and ANG III (195). The minimal effective intravenous infusion rate of ANG II was between 125 and 250 pmol/min (8-16 pmol·kg-1·min-1). Even at the highest rate of infusion, water intakes rarely exceeded 120 ml, much less than the intakes approaching 500 ml after a single intracranial injection of 1,000 pmol. Angiotensin II infused through one common carotid artery at 40 pmol/min produced much the same intakes as those produced by intravenous infusion at 250 pmol/min. Rates of infusion near the threshold for causing drinking were mildly pressor. In a thorough analysis of the actions of ANG II on the central nervous system of conscious mongrel dogs and bitches, Reid et al. (470) obtained results on drinking behavior using intravenous infusions (2, 5, 10, and 20 ng·kg-1·min-1) or infusions into both carotid arteries (0.1, 0.33, 1, and 2.5 ng·kg-1·min-1 unilaterally) similar to those obtained by Fitzsimons et al. (195). Some drinking was obtained with the lower rates of intravenous infusion, but the highest rate was the most effective causing 4 of 5 dogs to drink 129 ± 37 ml in 30 min, and producing a plasma ANG II of 449 pg/ml (470). The threshold carotid infusion was also similar to that of Fitzsimons et al. (195); infusions into both vertebral arteries failed to stimulate drinking even though the concentrations of ANG II in the cerebral circulation were more than twice those produced by intracarotid infusions. In mongrel dogs, intravenous ANG II (50 ng/min, 2-3 ng·kg-1·min-1 for 30-60 min) also lowered the threshold of drinking in response to hypertonic NaCl (313).

As in the rat (see sect. IIIA), the accompanying acute pressor response seems to be inhibitory to ANG II-induced drinking in the dog. After ganglionic blockade with subcutaneous hexamethonium, the pressor response to lateral ventricular or intravenous injection of ANG II was enhanced, and at the same time, drinking in response to intracranial ANG II was attenuated and that to intravenous ANG II virtually abolished (322). The inhibition of drinking in the dog by an acute rise in blood pressure seems to be mediated by vascular stretch receptors. After denervation of the carotid sinus, aortic arch, and heart, thereby eliminating all inhibitory high-pressure and low-pressure baroreceptor inputs to the central nervous system, intravenous infusion of ANG II at 10 and 20 ng·kg-1·min-1 for 30 min caused dose-related drinking in dogs and bitches (breed not stated), but these rates of infusion had virtually no effect on drinking in sham-operated dogs (309). This supports the hypothesis that in dog as in rat the dipsogenic action of ANG II is opposed by increased inhibitory discharge from cardiovascular stretch receptors set in train by the pressor action of ANG II.

The cat was much less responsive than the dog to the dipsogenic action of intravenous ANG II, requiring an infusion rate of 200 ng·kg-1·min-1 to induce drinking (102). The goat did not drink in response to ANG II infused intravenously at 5 ng·kg-1·min-1 for 30 min (10), although it drank vigorously after an intracarotid infusion of 675 ng/min (606). Normally hydrated cows did not drink water in response to 400 µg/h but when dehydrated increased their intake of 0.3 M NaHCO3-NaCl solution (46, 47). The sheep did not show any increase in water intake during a 3-day intravenous infusions of ANG II (5-40 µg/h) but did drink when 400, 800, or 1,200 ng/min were infused in one carotid artery with the contralateral carotid occluded (4, 655, 657, 658). The flying fox, Pteropus gigantius, and guinea pig (and rat) drank water after intraperitoneal injection of 5-10 µg/100 g ANG II, but the chipmunk, Tamias sibiricus, was relatively insensitive, requiring 50-100 µg/100 g (312). The mouse showed little or no response to intraperitoneal injection (up to 100 µg/100 g) or subcutaneous infusion (10 µg/day) of ANG II (123, 312, 499). The equivocal responsiveness of the rabbit to intracranial ANG II was also found with systemic administration; wild rabbits did not drink water in response to single intraperitoneal injections of ANG II (100 µg/kg) or renin (30 mU/kg) (125), but in another study, intraperitoneal ANG II caused a striking increase in water intake in one rabbit (312). Wild and New Zealand rabbits are also unresponsive to intravenous infusion of ANG II, although fluctuations in daily water intake occurred and, after higher rates (2 nmol/h), increases in water intake proportional to and concurrent with the water loss resulting from ANG II-induced diuresis have been described (23, 598). As mentioned above and fully described in section IXC1, experiments with an ACE inhibitor support a role for ANG II in the regulation of water intake (and NaCl intake) in rabbit (601). Intravenous ANG II caused the North American opossum (165) and the Australian brush-tailed possum (686) to drink; there are no published results on the intracranial responsiveness of the brush-tailed possum.

C. Angiotensin-Induced Water Intake in Birds, Reptiles, and Fish

Renin-angiotensin systems are present in birds, reptiles, amphibians, and bony fish (260, 261), and possibly in elasmobranch fish (593). Sensitivity to the dipsogenic action of ANG II occurs in all vertebrate groups except amphibians. Many birds have been found to drink in response to intracranial injection of ANG II (Table 2). The pigeon, Columba livia, is a vigorous drinker, showing a copious, short-latency response to intracranial ANG II (see Fig. 7) that is largely completed within ~10 min of injection (152). It responds to femtomole doses of ANG II, and it is at least as sensitive as the rat but drinks about three times as much water to a given dose. Other birds that drink in response to intracranial ANG II are Japanese quail, Coturnix coturnix japonica (591), white-crowned sparrow, Zonotrichia leucophrys gambelii (646), Pekin duck, Anas platyrhynchos (115), turkey (121), and domestic chicken (525, 548), or chick (645), Gallus gallus and Gallus domesticus, in which the doses (10 µg) required to cause drinking were very large.


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7.   Mean water intakes (in ml; ±SE) after ICV injections of ANG II, precursors of ANG II, and shorter chain ANG fragments into pigeon Columba livia. Birds did not drink between 30 and 60 min after tetradecapeptide (TDP) renin substrate, ANG I, and ANG II. Number of birds tested is given in parentheses. [Two figures combined from Evered and Fitzsimons (153).]

Systemic ANG II also causes drinking in birds. Intravenous (5-100 pmol/min for 15 min) or intraperitoneal ANG II is a highly effective stimulus to drinking in the pigeon, the lowest rate of intravenous infusion (16 pmol· kg-1·min-1) which caused drinking being similar to the lowest effective rate in rats and dogs (152). The Japanese quail drinks in response to intravenous ANG II (5-125 µg), and it also responds to subcutaneous injection (591). Another good responder to intravenous (646) and intraperitoneal (312) ANG II is the white-crowned sparrow. After an intravenous infusion of hypertonic NaCl, the duck drank in response to intravenous ANG II (200 ng/min), but without hypertonic priming, ANG II did not always stimulate drinking (535). The domestic chicken appears to be less sensitive than pigeon to systemic ANG II, but large amounts given by intravenous (300 µg), intramuscular (100-400 µg), or subcutaneous (100 µg) injection caused adult birds (525, 548) and chicks (645) to drink water. Two species of parrot, Barnardius zonarius semitorquatus and Barnardius zonarius zonarius, responded to intraperitoneal ANG II (1-50 µg/100 g), but two other species were relatively insensitive (310). In intraperitoneal injection experiments on 18 species of bird, including Japanese quail and white-crowned sparrow, most granivorous and omnivorous birds drank in response to ANG II (1-10 µg/100 g), but carnivorous species on the whole did not (312).

There have been few studies of dipsogenic responsiveness to angiotensin peptides in reptiles. Intraperitoneal injection of ANG II (5-40 nmol) caused dose-dependent drinking in the common iguana, Iguana iguana, with shorter latencies than after osmotic stimulation (193). The Indian gecko, Hemidactylus flaviviridis, the Japanese lizard, Takydromus tachydromoides, and Japanese skink, Eumeces latiscutatus, two species of Japanese snake, Elaphe quadrivarigata and Elaphe climacophora, and the mud turtle, Kinosternon subrubrum, all responded to intraperitoneal injection of ANG II (5-100 µg/100 g), but the European tortoise, Testudo graeca, needed very high doses (1,000 µg/100 g), and the Indian garden lizard, Calotes versicolor, and Indian water snake, Natrix piscator, failed to drink (312). Based on their experiments on the dipsogenic responsiveness of mammals, birds, and reptiles to intraperitoneal ANG II, Kobayashi et al. (312) concluded that animals that drink little water in their natural environment are relatively insensitive to the dipsogenic action of ANG II.

In fish, cyclostomes and teleosts in seawater drink continuously, presumably because of the dehydrating effect of the hypertonic environment in which they live, but elasmobranchs do not drink, perhaps because they are protected from dehydration by their own hypertonicity. Bony fish respond to similar dipsogenic stimuli as terrestrial vertebrates, although the neural organization is less encephalized and seems to be located in the hindbrain (594), presumably because the task of getting water is much simpler than for a terrestrial animal. Freshwater fish have to cope with osmotic inflow of water, and the problem is getting rid of water, not acquiring it, so that generally they do not drink, although some do. Euryhaline fish that migrate between seawater and fresh water drink while in seawater and stop drinking when in fresh water. In experiments on 20 species of freshwater fish and 17 species of seawater fish, it was found that the freshwater fish which enter and are able to survive in estuarine brackish water drank after intraperitoneal injection of ANG II (1-100 µg/100 g), whereas fish that live exclusively in fresh water or seawater did not respond (311). Among euryhaline fish, the Japanese eel, Anguilla japonica, drank in response to injection of ANG II (100 ng-100 µg) into the pneumogastric artery (594), the flounder, Platichthys flesus, to intravenous infusion (6 and 150 ng/min after captopril blockade) through the caudal vein (26, 93), and the killifish, Fundulus heteroclitus, to intraperitoneal injection (100 µg) (352). Because ANG II-induced drinking characterizes fish that from time to time enter water more hypertonic than that in which they typically live, it may be an emergency response to dehydration; true stenohaline freshwater or seawater species do not respond to ANG II. The mechanisms of ANG II-induced drinking in fish are unknown, nor have the sites of action of ANG II been established. It has been suggested that drinking may be related to ANG II-induced changes in blood pressure and that baroreceptors or volume receptors are involved, or that the chemoreceptors monitoring external chloride are important (261). Vagotomy prevents drinking completely, but the forebrain and midbrain can be destroyed without affecting the response.

D. Amphibians

Renin-angiotensin systems are present in amphibians in granular epithelioid cells arranged in what is recognizably the beginnings of a juxtaglomerular apparatus (260, 261). In general, amphibians do not drink when challenged by stimuli that cause members of other vertebrate groups to drink, but they maintain their water content by regulating percutaneous water absorption. Little is known about water-seeking behavior by dehydrated amphibians and possible effects of angiotensin peptides on such behavior. Common frogs in water deficit do not appear to find water any more readily than the hydrated frogs, and dehydrated frogs have been observed dying of water lack within a few centimetres of a pool of water (6). The esophagus-cannulated Japanese frog, Rana brevipoda, failed to drink in response to injection or infusion of ANG II through the abdominal vein (264). It also failed to drink after intravenous hypertonic NaCl or subcutaneous hyperoncotic dialysis (see sect. XC) but did drink immediately after exposure to seawater. Water-seeking behavior in newts, salamanders, frogs, and toads was also unaffected by angiotensin (264). A curious observation is that captopril appeared to promote drinking in frogs adapted to a hyperosmotic environment, a response prevented by nephrectomy (261). The ecology of the amphibian is so diverse that it seems likely that there would be differences in behavioral drives toward water, especially among the species that inhabit arid regions, for example, certain Australian frogs, which show burrowing behavior that enables them to reach the damp subsoil. Whether ANG II would cause them to do this more vigorously is an interesting question.

E. Importance of Sodium

According to Andersson (9), the effectiveness of ANG II as an intracranial dipsogen can be explained by its effect on sodium transport. Drinking, antidiuretic, natriuretic, and pressor responses in the goat were markedly enhanced when ANG II and hypertonic NaCl were infused together into the CSF, whereas the responses with either substance alone were much less (10-12). The angiotensin responses were much attenuated when ANG II was dissolved in isotonic glucose. Intracerebroventricular infusions of hypertonic NaCl are more dipsogenic than hypertonic saccharides in sheep and pig but not in dog (373). Thornton (604) found that pigeons drank normally in response to peripheral osmotic stimuli, but only hypertonic NaCl was effective centrally. Drinking appeared to be inititiated by osmoreceptors, but a certain CSF sodium concentration was required for the osmoreceptor mechanism to operate effectively. The pigeon's response to intracerebroventricular ANG II also depends on CSF sodium, drinking being attenuated when the CSF sodium was lowered (604). The sodium ion undoubtedly occupies a privileged position in the fluid and electrolyte economy of the body, and it would make physiological sense if there were special sodium receptors to monitor sodium concentration at certain critical sites. Angiotensin II could enhance the sodium effect by stimulating sodium transport from the CSF to putative sodium receptors, making the receptors more responsive to the existing sodium concentration, or increasing the intracellular sodium in the receptors (9). Most results are consistent with an osmoreceptor hypothesis, but sodium-sensitive receptors responding to CSF sodium concentration may play a "permissive role," and the responses of these could well be enhanced by increases in ANG II. In physiological circumstances where angiotensin-induced homeostatic mechanisms might be expected to operate, it is not obvious that variations in CSF sodium would be sufficient to affect responses, but sodium sensitivity may become important in hyponatremic or hypernatremic states.

F. Comment

Most mammals and birds, and probably reptiles and bony fish, possess ANG II-activated thirst mechanisms. The widespread occurrence of ANG II-induced drinking behavior in phylogeny reflects the evolutionary importance of defending the circulation in which the multiple actions of ANG II including stimulation of thirst and sodium appetite make important contributions. The ANG II-sensitive thirst mechanism is inborn, and in rat, it is functional before weaning. It is usually not possible on present evidence to say whether the variations in the thirst-stimulating effect of ANG II observed between animal species represent fundamental differences in ANG II-sensitive thirst mechanisms between species. It is more likely that the differences are quantitative and that animals that drink little and infrequently in nature are also less responsive to the dipsogenic action of ANG II in an experimental setting. Some of the differences may also be attributable to differences in the methodology of testing. Similar remarks apply to ANG II-induced sodium appetite (see sect. IV). When different strains of a particular animal species are tested in the same laboratory under similar conditions, it is quite clear that drinking responses to several dipsogenic and natriorexigenic challenges, not just to ANG II, show considerable variation between strains. Even evaluation of results from the same strain may present problems, especially when results obtained in different laboratories are being compared, because experimental schedules, conditions under which animals are kept and tested, diet, the source of the animals, and perhaps other unknown factors are likely to vary. Finally, it is rare to try to replicate free-living conditions which, in the case of laboratory-bred animals, would probably be unhelpful.

Because circulating ANG II levels are increased in hypovolemia and sodium deficiency in which increased thirst and sodium appetite occur, it could be argued that systemic rather than intracranial injection experiments provide a clearer insight into the physiological significance of ANG II-induced drinking. However, there are neurons in the central nervous system that are highly sensitive to the dipsogenic action of ANG II but inaccessible to blood-borne hormone. These neurons, and possibly some or all of the neurons accessible to circulating hormone, may also respond to angiotensin peptides generated locally in brain tissue (see sect. VII). The physiological circumstances in which this might occur still have to be explored. Systemic administration of ANG II by itself cannot be a very accurate representation of the physiological pattern of angiotensin stimulation in hypovolemia or sodium deficiency. In normal animals, the margin between doses that cause increased drinking and those causing a rise in blood pressure is narrow, but it is improbable that endogenously formed circulating peptide would ever act in isolation on thirst systems. Angiotensin II is far more likely to be just one component of a multifactorial stimulus to increased drinking. Angiotensin II acts in concert with other signals from an underfilled circulation to stimulate drinking, although the quantitative weighting of its contribution is uncertain. The sort of pressor response caused by the larger injected doses of ANG II is not likely to occur in the circumstances in which physiologically released ANG II would ever act.

To a much greater extent than with systemic administration, injection of ANG II through an implanted brain cannula is likely to be a poor representation of the physiological pattern of stimulation of ANG II-sensitive tissue by circulating or neuronally released peptide. The possible sources of variation in response are even greater than with systemic administration. Whether the cannula tip is in a ventricle or in brain tissue, and whether administration of hormone is by single bolus injection or prolonged infusion, are important variables. The local concentration of ANG II in sensitive tissue after injection into the parenchyma is likely to be considerably higher than after injection into the CSF. Because ANG II has multiple actions in the central nervous system, each presumably depending on the particular pattern of neuronal stimulation, several and perhaps opposing physiological systems could be activated by injected peptide diffusing indiscriminately. However, despite these theoretical complications, by far and away the dominant action across a wide range of species is increased drinking behavior. With the artificiality and crudeness of the intracranial injection technique kept in mind, it is altogether remarkable that such an integrated and apparently normal pattern of conscious behavior can be elicited, and hardly surprising that there should be variations in responses between species and laboratories.

It is reasonable to conclude that one of the physiological roles of ANG II-sensitive thirst neurons is to respond to the increases in circulating hormone that occur in hypovolemia and sodium deficiency, and to provide an additional stimulus to drinking when the fluid deficit is severe and developing rapidly and the need for water is urgent. Other hormones interact with ANG II to produce increased drinking responses, and this is especially true for the stimulating effects of ANG II on sodium appetite (see sect. IV), where the contribution may be substantial. The dipsogenic action of circulating ANG II is consistent with its natriorexigenic, cardiovascular, and renal actions, since all of these help to maintain and restore the circulating blood volume. There are also angiotensin-sensitive neurons concerned with blood volume control inside the blood-brain barrier, and these may respond to angiotensin peptides formed in brain tissue (see sect. VII). The relation between effects produced by blood-borne ANG II and angiotensin peptides generated within the brain is unknown. There are differences between the responses of ANG II-sensitive neurons inside and outside the blood-brain barrier in body fluid homeostasis, and injection of ANG II into the brain also has effects less obviously related to homeostasis such as control of protein synthesis, cell growth and proliferation, and learning and memory. Another important conclusion is that ANG II derived from whatever source is only one of a number of contributory factors to increased water intake (and NaCl intake) in hypovolemia, but it is an exceptionally potent one.

    IV. ANGIOTENSIN-INDUCED SODIUM APPETITE
Top
Previous
Next
References

Angiotension II causes a delayed and persistent increase in sodium appetite following the immediate thirst. This sequence reproduces the pattern of drinking in hypovolemia. Increased NaCl intake is an appropriate behavior in hypovolemia and sodium deficiency because extracellular solute as well as water is required for the proper restoration of blood volume. Increased ANG II-induced sodium appetite contributes to this, complementing the renal sodium-retaining actions of circulating ANG II. A major uncertainty is the relative importance of angiotensin peptides formed in the brain and those in the periphery in arousing the appetite. Most experiments on sodium appetite have been carried out on laboratory rats and mice, and on herbivores such as sheep, cattle, and wild rabbits. Some experiments have been performed on pigeons.

A. Angiotensin-Induced Sodium Intake

1. Intracranial administration

In early experiments on rats, it was found that large amounts of ANG II injected (500 ng) into the preoptic or septal regions or infused (30 µg in 8 h) into the lateral cerebral ventricle caused increased intakes of 1.8 and 2.7% NaCl solutions (
72). Intracranial carbachol (1 µg) stimulated water but not NaCl intake. Chiaraviglio (96) showed that smaller doses (5-40 ng) of ANG I or ANG II injected into the third cerebral ventricle of sodium-depleted rats in which sodium appetite had been abolished by bilateral nephrectomy restored the rat's intake of 1.0% NaCl to the prenephrectomy value. The ACE inhibitor teprotide prevented ANG I but not ANG II from having this effect. In experiments lasting 1 h on normal and adrenalectomized rats, single-pulse injections of renin (5 mU), TDP renin substrate, or ANG II (10-1,000 pmol) into the POA were found to produce some NaCl intake, but the effects were small compared with the large increases in water intake produced (206). Much larger increases in NaCl intake were observed when the observation period after injections was extended to 24 h, and especially when ANG II was given by continuous intracerebroventricular infusion for several days. In a comprehensive series of experiments (20), injection of ANG II (10, 100, or 1,000 pmol), TDP renin substrate (100 pmol), or lyophilized pig renin (1 or 10 mU) into the POA of sodium-replete normal rats caused an immediate increase in water intake and an increase in 2.7% NaCl intake that was slower in onset and more persistent than the increase in water intake, but ANG III was ineffective and carbachol only stimulated water intake. Long-term infusion of ANG II into the third ventricle (1, 10 pmol/h for 7 days, Ref. 20; 6, 60, 600, and 6,000 ng/h for 4 days, Ref. 69) sometimes caused marked increases in 2.7 or 3.0% NaCl intake as well as very large increases in water intake, with the NaCl intake persisting after the termination of the infusion (Fig. 4). Angiotensin-stimulated rats went into positive sodium balance. Animals made anuric by bilateral nephrectomy or ureteric ligation showed a significant increase in NaCl intake, although intakes were smaller than in intact animals. The effects of renin on NaCl intake (and water intake) were very large and persistent (21); the mechanism of sodium appetite caused by renin and precursors of ANG II is discussed in section VII. Angiotensin II-induced NaCl intake is specific for the sodium ion, not secondary to the accompanying increase in water intake nor to the natriuresis also induced by ANG II. It is persistent and enhanced by previous experience of sodium. The responses of bilaterally adrenalectomized or hypophysectomized rats to intracranial ANG II or renin were similar to those of normal animals, showing that the increased sodium appetite is not secondary to stimulation of hormone release from the pituitary or adrenal cortex (22).


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.   Top, left (ANG II infusion), mean 24-h 3% NaCl intakes of rats offered continuous access to water and NaCl during intracerebroventricular (ICV) infusion of 0.9% NaCl and last 2 days of a 4-day ICV infusion of ANG II at 6, 60, 600, or 6,000 ng/h. Right (post-ANG II infusion), mean 3% NaCl intakes for 4 days after termination of ANG II infusion in same animals arranged according to rates that they had previously been infused (rates in parentheses). Mean 24-h water intakes of these rats are given in corresponding bottom panels. Results are in ml and are means ± SE, and there were 5 rats in 6 ng/h group and 3 in each of other groups; no rat received more than one rate of infusion of ANG II. [Redrawn from Bryant et al. (69).]

In dogs, infusion of ANG II (1 µg·kg-1·h-1) into the third ventricle for 7 days caused a large and maintained polydipsia but no evidence of a sodium appetite (65, see Ref. 122). In cows and sheep, intracranial ANG II had no direct stimulating effect on sodium appetite, although thirst was aroused. Angiotensin II (3, 4, and 10 µg/h) infused into the lateral ventricle stimulated water intake in sodium-deficient cows (46) and in hydrated and dehydrated cows (47), but it did not alter the intake of 0.3 M NaHCO3-NaCl solution. There was no change in CSF ANG II as cattle became sodium deficient, although plasma ANG II increased as expected (33). In sodium-replete sheep, infusion of ANG II (3.8 µg/h for 2 days) into the lateral ventricle only stimulated 0.5 M NaCl intake by first causing natriuresis, and in sodium-deficient sheep, intracerebroventricular ANG II had no consistent effect on sodium loss or 0.6 M NaHCO3 intake (658).

In pigs, intracranial injection of ANG II (1, 10, 100, or 1,000 pmol) stimulated intake of 1.8% NaCl and water; ANG III was also highly effective, but ANG I and TDP renin substrate were less effective than ANG II (411). Intracranial pig renin (1 or 10 mU) also caused increased intakes of water and NaCl, but latencies and duration of response were longer. In mice, infusion of ANG II at 70 ng/day into the third ventricle caused parallel increases in intakes of 0.3 M NaCl and water by the third day of infusion; the large increase in NaCl intake was not secondary to natriuresis, and it is also likely that it accounted for the water intake (123). In wild and New Zealand rabbits, several days of intracerebroventricular infusion of ANG II (10-500 pmol/h) caused increased NaCl intake that was preceded by sodium loss but that had surpassed the sodium deficit by the second day (125, 598). In pigeons, injection of purified renin (1 ng) into the third ventricle caused an immediate increase in water intake followed ~6 h later by an increase in 3.0% NaCl intake (151), but domestic chicks failed to show a sodium appetite after intracranial injection of ANG II (10 µg) or renin (1.0 µg) (645).

In responsive animals, the usual effect of intracranial ANG II is a vigorous, short-latency increase in water intake followed by a slowly developing and persistent increase in sodium salt intake. This pattern suggests that in stimulating sodium intake, ANG II is doing more than simply depolarizing the appropriate neurons. Among other actions, ANG II affects protein synthesis, cell growth, learning, and memory, all of which, it could be argued, may be involved in the development of sodium appetite. Some support for this view is the fact that steroid hormones such as the mineralocorticoids and certain of the hormones associated with pregnancy and lactation, whose major effects are mediated through increased synthesis of mRNA, can cause striking increases in sodium appetite; lipid-soluble steroids easily penetrate the blood-brain barrier and produce widespread effects in the central nervous system (122). When a small infusion of ANG II into the third ventricle was combined with a small subcutaneous injection of DOCA, greater sodium appetite was aroused with shorter latency than after larger amounts of either hormone given separately (207). The sodium appetite did not result from ANG II-induced natriuresis because intake exceeded excretion during the period of pronounced NaCl intake. Similar synergistic action between mineralocorticoids and ANG II on sodium appetite also occurs in pigeons (362).

But in view of the necessity of replacing volume rapidly, active inhibitory systems restraining NaCl intake until water has been replenished may be needed, rather than simply relying on the slowness of the appetite to develop. One suggestion is that parvocellular oxytocinergic neurons in the PVN may operate as an inhibitory system to ANG II-induced sodium appetite. This possibility is supported by the finding that intracranial injection of 5 ng ANG II preceded 30 min beforehand by intracranial injection of different oxytocin receptor antagonists resulted in a three- to fourfold increase in NaCl intake without water intake being affected in the first 15 min after ANG II (42). This dose of ANG II caused marked c-fos expression (see sect. VIA) in magnocellular and parvocellular oxytocinergic neurons and in the magnocellular vasopressinergic neurons. Oxytocin and the other possible inhibitory neurotransmitters, including the tachykinins, PGs, opioids, and natriuretic peptides, are considered in section VIII.

Adrenocortical function is not essential for intracranial ANG II stimulation of sodium appetite. Increased activation of the renal and possibly of the brain renin-angiotensin systems after adrenalectomy, or decreased activation brought about by chronic DOCA treatment, had little if any effect on the total amount of fluid drunk in response to ANG II injected into the POA, but in both cases, rats drank a larger proportion of their total fluid intake as NaCl than did normal rats (192). Sodium-replete adrenalectomized rats that were experienced drinkers of aversive concentrations of NaCl, increased their intake of 2.7% NaCl after preoptic injections of ANG II, renin, or TDP renin substrate, whereas carbachol did not have this effect (206). Similar preoptic injections in sodium-depleted adrenalectomized rats stimulated water intake but did not cause any further increase in the already high NaCl intake. Whether or not other hormones that are associated with states of increased demand for or deficiency of sodium act synergistically with ANG II in the way that mineralocorticoids may act is not known. The mechanisms of sodium appetite are certainly more complex than those for thirst, with several hormonal and nonhormonal factors implicated.

2. Systemic administration

In rats, bilateral nephrectomy greatly reduced an existing sodium appetite, which seemed to indicate that circulating ANG II contributes to the appetite (
201, 206). But in sheep, nephrectomy did not consistently reduce sodium intake (52), and in rats, bilateral ureteric ligation (see sect. XH) also reduced NaCl intake, although in this case plasma renin levels rose, which indicated that some consequence of anuria was responsible and not the effect of the procedure on plasma renin levels. Attempts to restore the sodium appetite of anuric rats with systemic administration of renin or ANG II have met with mixed success. When the highly palatable 1.0% NaCl was available to drink, Chiaraviglio (96) was able to reinstate about one-third of the expected NaCl intake in sodium-depleted nephrectomized rats by injecting renin into the peritoneal cavity, but others (201, 206) have found that in nephrectomized rats with access to more concentrated NaCl solutions, intraperitoneal injection of renin or intravenous infusion of ANG II caused an increase in water intake but had little effect on NaCl intake. Even in animals with intact kidneys, the results of systemic ANG II infusions on sodium appetite have been inconsistent. Systemic administration of renin or ANG II, or stimulating renal renin release pharmacologically (see sect. IX), was a great deal more effective at arousing thirst than sodium appetite. In sodium-replete rats, intravenous ANG II caused an increase in NaCl intake, but it was not established whether central nervous structures were stimulated directly by blood-borne ANG II or whether the increase was secondary to ANG II-induced natriuresis or caused indirectly through stimulation of mineralocorticoid secretion (166). In long-term balance experiments in rats in which ANG II was infused intravenously at 50-100 pmol·kg-1·min-1 over several days, there were increases in intake of NaCl as well as water, but from the time courses of the responses, it appeared that the NaCl intake was secondary to increased sodium loss in the urine (19), although this would by no means exclude a contribution to the appetite from increased ANG II in the bloodstream or brain. Experiments, to be discussed shortly, in which the pressor response to ANG II was moderated with captopril suggest that this may well have been the case. Increased water intake, on the other hand, was a primary effect of ANG II on central thirst mechanisms and was not secondary to increased loss of water.

Results in other animal species give rise to further uncertainties. In dogs, intravenous infusion of ANG II (20 ng·kg-1·min-1) caused increases in water intake but no increases in 0.3 M NaCl intake during 4 h, and this was also the case when ANG II or renin (1 U) was infused after pretreatment with DOCA (30 mg/day) for 5 days (464). Deoxycorticosterone acetate by itself had no effect on NaCl intake, although when dogs were made sodium deficient by diet and furosemide, they showed a well-developed sodium appetite. In sodium-deficient cows (46), and in dehydrated but not hydrated cows (47), intravenous ANG II caused an increase in 0.3 M NaHCO3-NaCl solution intake but had no significant effect on water intake. In sodium-replete sheep, intravenous ANG II caused an increase in NaCl intake, but this was secondary to increased sodium loss (658), whereas in sodium-deficient sheep, ANG II caused either a decrease in NaHCO3 intake (52) or had no consistent effect (657). In mice, systemic administration of ANG II had little effect on either water or NaCl intake (123). In wild rabbits, single intraperitoneal injection of ANG II or renin had no effect on NaCl intake (125), but in wild and New Zealand rabbits, intravenous infusion of ANG II caused a gradually increasing intake of 0.5 M NaCl that exceeded sodium excretion (598).

One of the factors that could interfere with possible effects of circulating ANG II on NaCl intake, already discussed in relation to water intake (see sect. III), is the ANG II pressor response. The inhibition of sodium intake in sodium-deficient sheep (52) suggests this as a possibility. Evidence that baroreceptors may provide a critical neural input for the normal expression of sodium appetite as they do for hypovolemic thirst is the finding that sinoaortic baroreceptor-denervated rats drank less saline in response to furosemide-induced sodium depletion than sham-denervated rats (620). This could mean that in intact animals a reduction in the basal baroreceptor input provides an essential stimulus to increased NaCl intake in sodium depletion, and because this reduction is no longer possible after denervation, the essential stimulus is lost. Some experiments in which rises in arterial pressure were moderated and an existing sodium appetite was eliminated with systemic captopril (see sect. IXC2) also suggest a direct stimulatory role for circulating ANG II. Captopril was infused intravenously at 2.5 mg/h, which blocks peripheral conversion of ANG I to ANG II without affecting central conversion, and also blocks the increased sodium appetite of furosemide-induced sodium depletion (174). In these circumstances, intravenous infusion of ANG II at 30 ng/min, a rate comparable to that causing increased water intake, elicited increased water intake and reinstated the sodium appetite in these sodium-depleted rats. The NaCl intake was not secondary to sodium loss. Angiotensin II-induced rises in arterial blood pressures were less in captopril-treated rats than in unblocked rats, providing further support for the view that rises in arterial pressure inhibit sodium appetite. Systemically administered ACE inhibitors also depressed the sodium appetite of sodium deficiency in cows, sheep, mice, and rabbits, and this could be reversed by systemic ANG II.

3. Strain, sex differences, and sex hormones

There are important animal strain and sex differences in sodium appetite that have a bearing on ANG II-induced NaCl intake, as has already been discussed for water intake (see sect. III). The commonly used Wistar and Sprague-Dawley strains of rat show well-developed sodium preference and sodium appetite. When in sodium deficit and allowed access to NaCl, the rats usually overcorrect any but the largest deficit, whereas sheep and rabbits drink amounts of sodium-containing solutions commensurate with the sodium deficit (
122). There are considerable differences between rat strains. Sodium-depleted Fischer 344 rats show little increase in sodium appetite compared with outbred male Wistar rats (388, 408), whereas SH rats show an enhanced NaCl preference and larger NaCl intakes to most challenges, including to intracranial ANG II. Despite the failure of Fischer 344 rats to increase NaCl intake after a period of dietary sodium depletion, renal hormonal and metabolic adjustments were similar to those of Wistar rats (408). The increased baseline arginine vasopressin of Fischer 344 rats (see sect. IIIA3), if accompanied by increased oxytocin, would be compatible with the hypothesis that the attenuated sodium appetite of Fischer 344 rats is attributable to high levels of posterior pituitary hormones and in particular oxytocin (see sect. VIIIJ). Chronic peripheral administration of ANG II produced an increase in NaCl intake in Sprague-Dawley rats but not in Fischer 344 rats (91). In response to sodium depletion or treatment with ACE inhibitors, Dahl salt-resistant rats (see sect. IIIA3) showed increased NaCl intake, whereas the salt-sensitive strain did not (500). Brattleboro rats (see sect. XI) and Long-Evans controls showed similar increases in NaCl intake in response to sodium depletion and other natriorexigenic stimuli (144, 223).

There are few results on possible sex differences in the natriorexigenic effects of ANG II. Female rats generally ingest more NaCl than males, spontaneously and in response to some need-free natriorexigenic treatments, but the difference disappears if females are compared with castrated males (523). However, this is not always the case. When male and female Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to dietary sodium deprivation for a period of 8 days, the males drank more 0.5 M NaCl than the females and considerably more than needed to replace the sodium losses (570). Large increases in NaCl intake occur in pregnancy and lactation, and the hormones concerned in these states, including progesterone, estrogens, prolactin, and oxytocin, have been implicated in the increased sodium appetite (122, 523, 532). Increases in ACTH, ANG II, and corticosteroids also make their contribution. Prolactin causes thirst and increased sodium appetite in humans and rabbits (184, 532). The role of estrogens in NaCl intake is uncertain. In rat spontaneous (122) and ANG II-induced (111) NaCl intakes, like water intake, decrease at estrus. By itself, systemic estradiol caused a doubling of NaCl intake in rabbit, and this effect was enhanced by simultaneous injection of progesterone (122), but it is not known whether ANG II enhances this natriorexigenic effect. However, in rat, systemic estradiol inhibited the sodium appetite normally induced by sodium deprivation in ovariectomized animals and also in castrated males (570). In view of large increases in intakes of water and NaCl in response to the demands of pregnancy and lactation and the important natriorexigenic effect of the hormones of pregnancy and lactation, it is clear that further work is needed to investigate possible interactions between these hormones and ANG II on sodium appetite.

B. Angiotensin-Induced Sodium Appetite, a More Complex Response Than Angiotensin-Induced Thirst

The mechanisms involved in the arousal of sodium appetite by injecting ANG II or causing its formation in the body are likely to be more complicated than those of ANG II-induced thirst if only for the reason that acquisition of salt must be more difficult than acquisition of water, requiring the identification and ingestion of different sodium-containing salts that may be available as crystalline salt, solutions of varying concentration and composition, or just mixed with food. A further complication with systemic administration is that any increase in plasma ANG II, however caused, is likely to be accompanied by increased circulating aldosterone which, independently of ANG II or synergistically with it, stimulates sodium appetite (see sect. IIC). Blood-borne ANG II is not essential for induction of sodium appetite (or thirst) because the appetite can also be aroused in the absence of increases in ANG II formation or when formation is suppressed by excess mineralocorticoids.

Like the responses to other natriorexigenic challenges, ANG II-induced increases in sodium appetite are generally slow to develop, tend to be persistent, and are affected by previous experience of the conditions accompanying the natriorexigenic stimulus. The sequence of response to ANG II resembles that to any hypovolemic stimulus. The effect of hypovolemia on drinking behavior is an immediate increase in water intake followed by a slowly developing and persistent increase in NaCl intake. This is the desirable sequence of drinking response because in hypovolemia ". . . there is an immediate need for restoration of volume, primarily to maintain the circulation. Water is best suited for this because it is a substance of uniform composition which presents no problem of variable palatability and because the mechanisms controlling its intake are quantitative" (178).

How is the appropriate sequence of initial thirst followed by increased sodium appetite achieved? Part of the delay in onset of sodium appetite may be attributable to the fact that rats maintained on standard laboratory diet have an excess body sodium that acts as a buffer when natriorexigenic stimuli are applied. For example, the onset of NaCl intake was more rapid in rats made hypovolemic by hyperoncotic dialysis (see sect. XC) and which had been maintained on a sodium-deficient diet than it was in rats maintained on a normal sodium-containing diet (563, 571). However, this is unlikely to be the entire explanation for the difference in latencies of onset between ANG II-induced thirst and sodium appetite. Even in the sodium-depleted adrenalectomized rat where the need to take salt was more urgent than in a normal animal, intracranial injection of components of the renin-angiotensin system stimulated water intake before NaCl intake (206). The delay in onset of NaCl intake suggests that for full expression of sodium appetite, synthesis of a neurotransmitter or paracrine agent, modification of receptors, alteration in morphology of the neural connections, or any of these may be necessary. The stimulating effects of mineralocorticoids and ANG II on sodium appetite would accord well with these possible effects, since the hormones are known to stimulate protein synthesis. Denton (122) has suggested that a change in intracellular sodium concentration in the neurons subserving sodium appetite might initiate transcription and synthesis of a specific protein, which would lead to alterations in the ionic or membrane characteristics of the relevant neurons. Although the length of time needed for transcription and protein synthesis may account for some of the features of sodium appetite, especially the delay in onset, a more physiological mechanism of active inhibition of sodium appetite by central nervous pathways involving various neuroactive substances may operate to prevent any diversion of interest away from water until the water intake necessary for restoration of volume is well on the way to being completed. There is some evidence that inhibitory neuroactive substances released in hypovolemia, e.g., oxytocin (see sect. VIII), inhibit sodium appetite until the falling plasma osmolality or sodium concentration as water is drunk brings to an end any further release, leading to increasing acceptability of sodium solutions.

C. Comment

Intracranial ANG II-induced increases in sodium appetite can be obtained in rat, pig, mouse, and pigeon, less certainly in rabbit, but in cow only intravenous administration was effective. Increases are slower to develop, especially in mouse, and more persistent than increases in thirst, and unlike thirst responses, they are augmented by previous experience of increased sodium appetite. Stimulation of protein synthesis leading to modification of receptors and neural connections may account for some of these features including the delay. However, in hypovolemia, a more active mechanism inhibiting sodium appetite may operate until enough water has been drunk to restore, in part at least, the more urgently needed volume because it is vital to sustain the circulation. Falling osmolality of the body fluids as water is drunk could be the signal to disinhibit sodium appetite, and there is some evidence that inhibitory neuroactive substances (see sect. VIII) may be involved.

In rat and mouse, intracranial injection of ANG II caused increased sodium appetite, but systemic ANG II seemed ineffective. This might indicate that increases in sodium appetite normally depend more on angiotensin peptides generated in brain than on blood-borne hormone, a possibility discussed in section VII. It could also mean that the conditions of systemic administration experiments did not allow expression of the appetite, possibly because the stimulating effect of ANG II on sodium appetite was masked by an inhibitory effect of the accompanying rise in blood pressure as happens in ANG II-induced thirst. There is support for this; sodium appetite that has been blocked with captopril can be reinstated with intravenous ANG II in rat, mouse, rabbit, cow, and sheep. In cow and possibly in sheep, circulating ANG II seems to be the more effective stimulus to increased sodium appetite; intracranial ANG II has no direct stimulating effect on sodium intake. It is not yet clear whether this represents real differences in mechanisms compared with those in the rat, pig, mouse, and pigeon, the animal species that have been shown to increase their sodium intake in response to intracranial ANG II. The remarks made in section IIIF about the meaning of species and strain differences as they apply to ANG II-induced thirst apply with equal force to ANG II-induced sodium appetite. The differences are more likely to be quantitative than qualitative and may be explained by species differences in accessibility of receptors to ANG II administered by the different routes. The almost universal practice of allowing animals to gratify increases in sodium appetite by drinking sodium solutions of varying concentrations is one of a number of methodological problems, since this is probably not the usual way in which animals encounter salt in the wild. Some of the differences in ANG II responsiveness could be explained by the particular problems the herbivore has to obtain sodium and could also reflect the importance of other factors such as mineralocorticoids in generating sodium appetite.

Quite apart from circulating ANG II stimulating central receptors for sodium appetite directly, very high plasma levels of ANG II resulting from high rates of infusion could also stimulate appetite indirectly by causing increased renal sodium loss. Lower and more physiological increases in plasma ANG II levels prevent renal sodium loss but could also stimulate sodium appetite indirectly through the increases in mineralocorticoid secretion they produce. But even in those cases where increased NaCl intake occurred as a consequence of ANG II-induced natriuresis, the increased plasma ANG II caused by the sodium deficit could have enhanced the effect of the increased mineralocorticoids and altered cardiovascular stretch receptor input on sodium appetite. Furthermore, the sodium deficit could also have generated increases in brain angiotensin peptides independently of any change in circulating hormone levels, although there is little information on this. It is also clear that other hormones, notably the hormones of pregnancy and lactation and those released in stress, may have important roles. As in thirst, there are multiple controls for sodium appetite, including ANG II, each contributing to the overall response depending on the circumstances.

    V. EFFECTS OF ANGIOTENSIN ANALOGS AND ANTAGONISTS ON DRINKING
Top
Previous
Next
References

Different angiotensin peptides are formed by the renin-angiotensin system (see Fig. 1), and for some of these there are specific receptors. Renin and the precursors and the shorter chain analogs of ANG II possess varying degrees of dipsogenic and natriorexigenic activity, and some angiotensin-related peptides act as ANG II antagonists. The effects of renin, angiotensin analog agonists, and antagonists, including the newer receptor subtype selective blockers and antisense oligonucleotides, on thirst and sodium appetite are discussed here. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and drinking are dealt with in section IXC.

A. Angiotensin Structure-Activity and Drinking

Of the 10 amino acid residues in the angiotensin decapeptides isolated from different vertebrate groups (Table 3), varying substitutions have occurred in the course of evolution in positions 1, 5, and 9 (260, 261, 405). The angiotensinogen gene is therefore remarkably well conserved. Two angiotensin octapeptides have been identified in mammals, differing by a single amino acid. Human, horse, pig, rat, and guinea pig and probably dog and rabbit have [Ile5]ANG II; cow, probably sheep, and nonmammalian vertebrates have [Val5]ANG II. In rat (189) and pigeon (152), there was no difference in dipsogenic potency between the two ANG II, and this seems to be true for dog and rhesus monkey, although direct comparisons have not been made. The angiotensin decapeptides of all nonmammalian vertebrate groups examined so far have Val5 but show differences from the mammal in position 9 (260, 261). The structural requirements for the dipsogenic activity of ANG II (181, 190) are similar to those for its myotropic and pressor actions (76, 405, 468). The aromatic side groups of Tyr4 and His6, the guanidino group of Arg2, and the hydrophobic phenyl ring and carboxyl of Phe8 are involved in binding to the receptor site, whereas Tyr4 and Phe8 are needed for most biological responses (275). Conversion of ANG I to ANG II by ACE exposes Phe8, providing the aromatic ring necessary for myotropic, pressor, and dipsogenic actions. Angiotensin analogs with a COOH-terminal aliphatic amino acid instead of Phe8 have very little agonistic activity and act as antagonists of ANG II; the best known of these is [Sar1,Ala8]ANG II or saralasin which has found widespread use in thirst and sodium appetite research. But for intestinal water and sodium absorption, Phe8 can be replaced by aliphatic amino acids with retention of full agonistic activity (339).

Other angiotensin analogs of varying dipsogenic effectiveness are also produced. However, their involvement in drinking behavior remains to be established. Cleavage of ANG II by the aminopeptidases present in many tissues including angiotensin receptors yields [des-Asp1]ANG II or ANG-(2--8), which is also called ANG III. In some circumstances, ANG III is a dipsogenically active peptide. An alternative pathway for ANG III formation is by aminopeptidase action on ANG I to form [des-Asp1]ANG I, which is then acted upon by ACE. Further processing of ANG II or III from the NH2 terminus by aminopeptidases, endopeptidases, and carboxypeptidases leads to smaller fragments with progressive loss of dipsogenic activity. The [des-Phe8]ANG II, or ANG-(1--7), can also be formed from either ANG I or ANG II by various enzymes that include prolyl endopeptidase, a serine protease present in brain, other peptidases, e.g., enkephalinase, and angiotensinase C, although it is uncertain which of these peptidases is responsible for formation of ANG-(1--7) in vivo (86, 162). Formation of ANG-(1--7) from ANG I by-passes ANG II formation so that it is not blocked by ACE inhibitors. On the contrary, preventing ANG II formation in this way results in greatly increased production of ANG-(1--7). Angiotensin-(1--7) is without any immediate stimulatory effect on drinking, but whether it has longer term or more subtle effects on drinking behavior remains to be investigated.

B. Angiotensin Antagonists

1. Angiotensin antibodies

Angiotensin antibodies have been mainly used for immunohistochemical tracing of angiotensinergic pathways in the central nervous system, but there have been a few studies of its effects on drinking behavior. In an early experiment on the rat, the effect of systemic ANG II antibody was examined in two types of extracellular thirst (
2). Prior intravenous infusion of the antibody caused a significant reduction in drinking in response to subcutaneous injection of polyethylene glycol (see sect. XC) and especially to subcutaneous isoproterenol (see sect. IXA). The findings were consistent with a role for circulating ANG II in these two extracellular challenges to thirst. In another experiment, it was found that when water was offered 1 or 3 h after injection of ANG II antibody into the third ventricle of rats that had been subjected to overnight water deprivation, the amounts drunk were greatly reduced compared with rats receiving the same volume of normal rabbit serum (209). Normal ad libitum drinking was unaffected by ANG II antibody. However, intracerebroventricular injections of antibodies to ANP, vasopressin, or oxytocin also inhibited water deprivation-induced drinking, although the onset of the blockade was slower. None of the antisera was effective when water was offered immediately after the intracerebroventricular injections. Doubts about the specificity of the blockade are partly resolved by the fact that only the ANG II antibody blocked intracerebroventricular ANG II-induced drinking; the other antisera were ineffective. But because these other antisera attenuated water deprivation-induced drinking in which there are cell dehydration and hypovolemic components, drinking in response to water deprivation could depend on actions of ANP, vasopressin, and oxytocin as well as on ANG II. There are some difficulties with this interpretation. Although vasopressin may stimulate drinking, at least in some species, ANP inhibits thirst, and oxytocin may inhibit sodium appetite (see sect. VIII, H-J). The wide availability of specific receptor blockers and antagonists of the renin-angiotensin cascade has diverted attention from the possibilities of using antibodies to analyze mechanisms of thirst and sodium appetite. However, the development of monoclonal AT1 (28) and polyclonal AT2 (467) receptor antibodies may stimulate new experiments and yield new information about drinking behavior elicited by angiotensin peptides and other challenges to thirst and sodium appetite.

2. Angiotensin analog antagonists

In rat and other mammals, some analogs of angiotensin with an aliphatic amino acid in place of COOH-terminal phenylalanine act as competitive antagonists of the myotropic, pressor, dipsogenic, and natriorexigenic actions of ANG II, while retaining a small degree of agonism. [Sar1,Val5,Ala8]ANG II (saralasin), [Sar1, Gly8]ANG II, [Sar1,Ile8]ANG II (sarile), and [Sar1, Thr8]ANG II (sarthran) possess similar properties and are the receptor antagonists that have been most used in drinking experiments (Table
3). Sarcosine at the NH2 terminus protects the molecule from degradation by aminopeptidases giving a long-acting inhibitor. Saralasin administered some minutes before renin, TDP renin substrate, ANG I, or ANG II through the same intracranial cannula attenuated drinking in response to these dipsogens in rat but did not affect carbachol-induced drinking (189). Antagonism was dose dependent and for the peptides was complete at an antagonist-to-agonist mole ratio of 100:1. Saralasin also inhibited drinking induced by intracranial ANG II in cat (102) and dog (463).

In the pigeon in contrast, saralasin and similar antagonists given by intracranial injection in antagonist-to-agonist mole ratios of 100:1 to 10,000:1 did not inhibit drinking caused by intracranial ANG II or TDP renin substrate, and intravenous saralasin was also ineffective against pressor responses to intravenous ANG II, although it was fully effective in rat (153). The reason for the difference in inhibitory effectiveness of saralasin in mammals and pigeons is puzzling in view of the similarity of drinking responses to ANG II. The structure of pigeon ANG II is unknown, but it is unlikely to be very different from the chicken octapeptide, which is the same as mammalian [Val5]ANG II (550). The failure of aliphatic 8-substituted analogs to inhibit ANG II-induced drinking and pressor responses in pigeon could mean that angiotensin side groups are less important for binding than in mammals and that the lack of Phe8 means that the antagonist has low affinity for pigeon angiotensin receptors. Aliphatic position 8-substituted analogs were also ineffective against pressor responses to ANG II in eels (423). In the duck, however, intravenous infusion of the 8-substituted analog sarile inhibited intravenous ANG II-induced drinking when the dose infused was 200 times higher than that of ANG II (535).

3. Receptor subtypes and selective antagonists

Angiotensin AT1 and AT2 receptor subtypes are present in mammal, identified by the ability of highly selective angiotensin receptor ligands to inhibit angiotensin binding (Table
4). The AT1 receptors selectively bind the nonpeptide losartan (previously called DuP-753), a tetrazolbiphenylimidazole, and AT2 receptors bind the nonpeptide tetrahydroimidazopyridines PD-123177 (also called WL-13 or EXP-655) and PD-123319 (also called WL-15) (98), and the peptide CGP-42112 (A or B) (662). Screening procedures and structural modification of potent nonpeptide angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonists have led to the discovery of compounds with approximately equal affinity for AT1 and AT2 receptors (308). One of these, L-162,313, is an agonist that mimics the biological actions of ANG II, including its dipsogenic action, and this effect can be blocked by pretreatment with losartan.

 
View this table:
[in this window] [in a new window]
 
TABLE 4.   Properties of angiotensin receptors

The AT1 receptors preferentially bind ANG II but also bind ANG III, whereas this order is reversed for AT2 receptors. Both receptor subtypes are found in various angiotensin-sensitive tissues in the periphery and central nervous system. Binding studies have disclosed species differences and heterogeneity within AT1 and AT2 receptors, and small structural differences between central receptors and their peripheral counterparts (53). All the known effects of ANG II on cardiac contractility, vasoconstriction, vascular hypertrophy, renal blood flow and sodium transport, release of aldosterone and vasopressin, as well as actions on the brain are mediated by AT1 receptors that are found all over the body in the brain, heart, vasculature, liver, kidney, and adrenal gland. The AT2 receptors are expressed at high levels in the fetus and also in the adult in certain pathological circumstances, suggesting possible roles in cell differentiation, growth, and regeneration, but expression in adults is normally more restricted, being confined to the heart, endothelium, adrenal glands, ovary, uterus, and parts of the brain. Little is known for certain of the function of AT2 receptors, but AT1 and AT2 receptors may have opposing effects on apoptosis, vasoconstriction, myoendothelial proliferation, and possibly on drinking behavior (631).

The AT1 receptor has been cloned and has a transmembrane topology similar to that of other G protein-coupled receptors, consisting of seven hydrophobic membrane-spanning helices with connecting extracellular and cytoplasmic domains for ligand binding and interaction with G proteins (275, 281, 282). Four cysteine residues in four extracellular domains form two disulfide bridges that are important for ligand binding and that account for the sensitivity of AT1 receptors to inactivation by sulfhydryl-reducing agents such as dithiothreitol. In the rat, the AT1 receptor has been further subdivided by cloning and sequencing into AT1A and AT1B subtypes (286). Signal transduction by the AT1 receptor is mediated by activation of phospholipase C through a stimulatory G protein or inhibition of adenylate cyclase through an inhibitory G protein (282). Activation of phospholipase C causes generation of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) and diacylglycerol. Calcium is released from intracellular stores by IP3 , and diacylglycerol stimulates protein kinase C leading to influx of extracellular calcium. The AT2 receptor has also been cloned and has a 32-34% identity with the AT1 receptor, sharing a seven-transmembrane topology with it (298, 407). Two AT2 subtypes have been found in brain. Seven transmembrane domain receptors are normally coupled to G proteins, but this is still uncertain for the AT2 receptor (414). In contrast to the inactivation of AT1 receptors by sulfhydryl-reducing agents, the affinity of the AT2 receptor for its ligands is increased by such agents. Signal transduction by the AT2 receptor may be linked to stimulation of phosphotyrosine phosphatase (PTPase) activity (53, 414).

Other proposed angiotensin receptors are AT3 in mouse neuro-2A cells (281), AT4 in various mammalian brain and peripheral tissues (583, 676, 677), and, doubtfully, a receptor encoded by the mas oncogene that almost certainly does not belong to the ANG II family (53). None of these has been directly implicated in drinking behavior, but because the AT4 site preferentially binds ANG IV or ANG-(3--8), an agonist that causes a small increase in water intake (see Fig. 7), its proposed role in learning, memory, and exploratory behavior may have a bearing on longer term modifications of drinking behavior. The AT4 binding sites have been found in the hippocampus, cerebral cortex, and other brain regions (Table 4) that are associated with these functions (253, 583, 676, 677). The AT4 receptor is probably not G protein linked, and the mechanism of signal transduction is unknown.

The density of AT1 and AT2 receptors is roughly equal in the brain stem, midbrain and hypothalamus, the AT1 receptors being slightly dominant in the brain stem and hypothalamus, whereas AT2 receptors are mainly expressed in the midbrain (53). The AT1 receptors are present in high density in the SFO, OVLT, MnPO nucleus, and medial POA, structures located in tissue surrounding the AV3V in the anterior hypothalamus and ventral portion of the lamina terminalis or AV3V region (see sect. VI). The AT1 receptors are also found in high density in PVN, SON, suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), median eminence (ME), anterior pituitary, amygdala, lateral parabrachial nucleus (LPBN), nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS), and area postrema (AP). The AV3V region with its high density of AT1 receptors is implicated in ANG II-induced water intake, but AT2 receptors are sparse at these sites (495). The AT2 receptors are found in the septum, thalamus, subthalamic nucleus (STH), basal ganglia, amygdala, medial geniculate, colliculi, locus ceruleus (LC), pons, inferior olive, and cerebellum. The distribution of AT1 receptors in the AV3V region suggests that ANG II-induced drinking behavior, like most of the other known functions of ANG II, is mediated through AT1 receptors. Direct support for this view is provided by a number of blocking experiments with the AT1 antagonist losartan, which also has the particular advantage of lacking the partial agonism shown by saralasin (671).

In the rat, subcutaneous losartan inhibited water intake caused by subcutaneous ANG I, ANG II, or ANG III (218, 670), but the AT2 receptor antagonist PD-123177 did not have any inhibitory action (670). Dourish et al. (134) confirmed that peripheral losartan caused a dose-dependent reduction in peripheral ANG II-induced water intake and found that another nonpeptide AT2 antagonist WL-19 (also called PD-121981), a close structural analog of PD-123177, did not inhibit and sometimes enhanced drinking. Subcutaneous losartan also inhibited intracranial ANG II-induced drinking (218). However, losartan does not readily cross the blood-brain barrier. Pressor responses induced by injection of ANG II into the lateral ventricle were blocked by intracerebroventricular losartan but not by a single oral dose of losartan (672). Oral administration of losartan for 3 days prevented the rise in blood pressure to intravenous ANG II but did not affect the pressor and drinking responses to injection of ANG II into the lateral ventricle (75). These results with oral losartan do not necessarily imply that peripherally administered losartan cannot cross the barrier as demonstrated by the in vivo inhibition of AT1 receptor binding inside the blood-brain barrier after intravenous administration (549). In an extended study of the time course and accessibility of angiotensin receptors in the brain to peripheral administration of antagonists, it was found that intraperitoneal injection of a range of doses of losartan, EXP-3174, and two other AT1 antagonists inhibited drinking in response to ANG II but not to carbachol injected into the lateral ventricle, in this way demonstrating the ability of these antagonists to cross the blood-brain barrier after peripheral administration (457). EXP-3174, the active metabolite of losartan, is a noncompetitive insurmountable antagonist with a long duration of action; it is formed in rat and human but to a limited extent only in other species (349). Losartan also inhibited central angiotensin mechanisms after oral administration but for a shorter period of time than after intraperitoneal injection.

When losartan (218, 306) or EXP-3174 (663, 664) was given by intracranial injection to rats offered water only, ANG II-induced water intake was inhibited. When a dose of ANG II (100 pmol) near the top of the dose-response relation was injected into the third ventricle of rats offered 1.8% NaCl as well as water to drink, intakes of both NaCl and water were inhibited by a preceding intracerebroventricular injection of losartan in antagonist-to-agonist molar ratio of 1,000:1, but water intake after a dipsogenically less effective dose (500 ng) of carbachol was unaffected (38). Angiotensin II-induced water intake was also significantly inhibited by losartan at an antagonist-to-agonist ratio of 100:1, but the AT2 antagonist CGP-42112B at this ratio had no significant effect on drinking. The effect of intracerebroventricular losartan on intracerebroventricular ANG II-induced drinking is therefore similar to that of saralasin and related angiotensin analogs. In cows (48) and sheep (655), thirst aroused by infusion of ANG II or hypertonic NaCl into the lateral ventricle was reduced by intracerebroventricular infusion of losartan but not by the AT2 antagonist PD-123319, and neither AT1 nor AT2 antagonists affected the sodium intake of sodium-depleted animals. As far as ANG II-induced drinking is concerned, the results, at least in mammals, agree with those obtained with systemic injections and show that ANG II-induced drinking is mediated by the AT1 receptor. In ducks, however, the effects of losartan on intravenous ANG II-induced drinking were equivocal when infused intravenously at rates 50 and 200 times higher than ANG II (535).

Although the importance of the AT1 receptor in short-term drinking responses to ANG II seems firmly established, the question of the possible involvement of AT2 receptors in some aspect of drinking behavior is not settled. Mutant mice lacking the gene encoding the AT2 receptor have an impaired drinking response to water deprivation and an increased pressor response to intracarotid infusion of ANG II, suggesting that the receptor plays a role in these functions (258). In rats, though not in cows or sheep, intracerebroventricular injection of the AT2 antagonist PD-123319 blocked drinking to a range of experimental thirst challenges, including to intracerebroventricular ANG II, without affecting food intake, which was interpreted as meaning that AT2 receptors form part of a final common pathway for an integrated thirst signal (219, 501). However, the absence of an effect on intakes of water and NaCl by the AT2 antagonist CGP-42112B is not consistent with this hypothesis (38), nor is the finding that PD-123177, which differs from PD-123319 in possessing a dimethyl instead of a methyl group and which in vitro has the same properties as PD-123319, did not inhibit intracerebroventricular ANG II-induced increases in intakes of water (663, 670), water and NaCl (103), or carbachol-induced water intake (103). Indeed, PD-123177 injected into the lateral ventricle can enhance intracerebroventricular ANG II-induced drinking (663), recalling the enhancement of peripheral ANG II-induced water intake by the closely related AT2 antagonist WL-19 (134) just described. The inhibitory effect of a single high intracerebroventricular dose of PD-123319 on intracerebroventricular ANG II-induced drinking in rat also possesses unusual features in that drinking was impaired for as long as 48 h (663, 664), which could indicate that AT2 receptors could have a role in the long-term organization of drinking behavior. It has also been suggested that AT2 receptors may have a permissive role in sodium appetite because third ventricular injection of doses of losartan that did not inhibit adrenalectomy-induced NaCl intake when given alone did so when combined with PD-123319 (226) (see sect. VIIC2).

The failure of ANG-(1--7), an angiotensin analog for which there is weak evidence (see sect. VD) of some AT2 agonism, to stimulate drinking, cannot be reconciled with the hypothesis of a final AT2 pathway. Even though [p-NH2-Phe6]ANG II, a presumed AT2 angiotensin agonist (99, 551), caused drinking, the doses required to produce responses that were similar in size to those produced by ANG II were more than 1,000 times greater (104). Increased drinking caused by intracerebroventricular [p-NH2-Phe6]ANG II was affected in the same way as ANG II by intracerebroventricular injection of losartan, CGP-42112B, or PD-123319. Losartan, but not CGP-42112B, inhibited drinking, suggesting that [p-NH2-Phe6]ANG II-induced drinking is mediated by AT1 and not AT2 receptors. PD-123319 also inhibited drinking, but this was an effect of PD-123319 pretreatment shown in response to all other thirst challenges, including those thought not to depend on angiotensin. Because drinking induced by [p-NH2-Phe6]ANG II or ANG II was unaffected by CGP-42112B, this could mean that there are different AT2 receptor subtypes of which only the PD-123319-sensitive one is involved in drinking. However, because high doses/concentrations of PD-123319 also inhibit AT1 sites, a more likely explanation is that only these are involved (622). More supporting evidence is needed to substantiate the claim that AT2 receptors or some subcategory are involved in a final common pathway for thirst. The possible roles of AT2 receptors in some aspects of thirst and sodium appetite remain to be determined.

4. Antisense oligonucleotides

Antisense oligonucleotides can be used to inhibit angiotensin receptor expression or angiotensin synthesis and are a potentially valuable addition to the pharmacological armamentarium for the analysis of angiotensin-dependent drinking behavior. Up to now, the approaches used have been similar to those that have yielded such valuable information using the more conventional antagonists of receptors and components of the renin-angiotensin cascade. Antisense oligonucleotides have been directed against mRNA sequences that encode for angiotensin receptors and for angiotensinogen. Three daily injections of angiotensin AT1 antisense oligonucleotides into the third ventricle of rat caused a decrease in AT1 receptor density without affecting AT2 receptors in hypothalamo-thalamo-septal tissue, and reversibly attenuated intracerebroventricular ANG II-induced and subcutaneous isoproterenol-induced drinking without affecting intracerebroventricular carbachol- and subcutaneous hypertonic NaCl-induced drinking (
510, 511). Scrambled oligonucleotides were ineffective. Antisense oligodeoxynucleotide to AT1 receptor mRNA injected into the lateral cerebral ventricle significantly inhibited intracerebroventricular ANG II-induced drinking in SH and Sprague-Dawley rats (Fig. 5) (384). The amounts of vasopressin released, measured in SH rats, and AT1 receptor binding, measured in Sprague-Dawley rats, were also significantly reduced. Scrambled antisense was again ineffective. Antisense oligonucleotides against mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid receptors have also been useful in helping to understand the role of the amygdala in sodium appetite (see sect. VIF).


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5.   Mean water intakes (+SE) of 5 spontaneously hypertensive rats in response to 50 ng ANG II ICV preceded by isotonic NaCl, scrambled oligodeoxynucleotide (SC-ODN), or antisense oligodeoxynucleotide (AS-ODN) for AT1 receptor mRNA. ** P < 0.01. [From Meng et al. (384).]

Antisense oligonucleotides have also been used to try to block ANG II synthesis. Oligonucleotides complementary to rat angiotensinogen mRNA injected into the lateral cerebral ventricle reduced drinking in response to intracerebroventricular injections of renin but not ANG II or carbachol (541, 542). The effects of antisense blockade on systemic thirst challenges were also tested. Animals treated with antisense to angiotensinogen mRNA by lateral cerebral ventricular injection showed decreased water intake in response to subcutaneous isoproterenol (see sect. IXA) or intraperitoneal hypertonic NaCl. On the other hand, drinking in response to intravenous hypertonic NaCl or subcutaneous polyethylene glycol (see sect. XC), or after a 24-h period of water deprivation, was unaffected by antisense treatment. Scrambled oligonucleotide treatment did not affect drinking in response to any of these thirst stimuli, and peripheral administration of antisense oligonucleotides did not inhibit intracerebroventricular renin-induced drinking. These results suggest that angiotensinogen, locally produced in the central nervous system, is a source of angiotensin peptides involved in certain types of drinking behavior. An outstanding issue discussed by Sinnayah and colleagues (542) is that antisense treatment did not lead to a reduction in the amount of angiotensinogen content as measured by the generation of ANG I in the presence of excess renin in CSF or brain homogenates. This may have been because the reduction occurred in a discrete region of the brain forming a small part of the block of brain tissue taken for analysis and was therefore not detected. It could also mean that antisense treatment inhibited drinking caused by intracerebroventricular renin or subcutaneous isoproterenol by some other mechanism, although this is unlikely. Results with antisense oligonucleotides have reinforced conclusions of experiments using receptor-selective pharmacological antagonists, but their full potential for exploring complex physiological systems has yet to be exploited.

C. Renin and Angiotensin II Precursors

Renin, TDP renin substrate, and ANG I are effective intracranial dipsogens in rat (79, 181, 190), dog (194, 471), pig (411), and pigeon (153), although there were differences in sensitivities to the different dipsogens in the different species. These substances also stimulate drinking when given systemically in rat, dog, and pigeon. Increased drinking caused by intracranial injection of renin, or the peptide precursors of ANG II, is mediated by ANG II generated in situ by components of a brain renin-angiotensin system (see sect. VIIC). Renin produces a pattern of drinking different from that produced by ANG II, ANG I, or TDP renin substrate. In the rat, it is an exceptionally powerful stimulus to both thirst and sodium appetite (Fig. 6). The onset of drinking after intracranial injection of lyophilized preparations of pig renal renin (10-50 mU) or purified mouse submaxillary gland renin (26.5-265 ng) tends to be delayed by a minute or so compared with ANG II-induced drinking, but the main difference is that renin-induced drinking may last for many hours or indeed days (20, 21). There are species differences in responsiveness to different renins. In rat, intrahypothalamic injections of partially purified rat renin were ~10 times as potent as pig renin in causing drinking (79). Pig renin was an effective intracranial dipsogen in the pigeon, but it was less potent than in the rat (153). After causing an immediate thirst, injection of purified renin (1 ng) into the third ventricle of the pigeon caused a delayed increase in sodium appetite (151).


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6.   Mean daily intakes (in ml; ±SE) of 5 rats offered water only (left) and 5 rats offered water and 2.7% NaCl (right) in response to a single injection of 26.5 ng purified renin into preoptic region. All injections were first injections. * P < 0.05, *** P < 0.001 compared with day preceding injection by paired t-test. Purified renin was prepared from mouse submaxillary gland by Drs. T. Inagami and K. Misonoby and was generously donated by them. [Modified from Avrith and Fitzsimons (21).]

Drinking in response to peptide precursors of ANG II is indistinguishable from that caused by ANG II itself. In the dog, the relative dipsogenic responsiveness to TDP renin substrate, ANG I, or ANG II, injected intracranially (1-1,000 pmol) or infused through a vein (250 pmol/min) or through one carotid artery (40 pmol/min), were similar (194, 195). Renin (0.05-0.5 U/min) infused intravenously was an effective dipsogen, but when renin was infused at the higher rate through one carotid artery, the amounts drunk were much less (195). Regardless of whether it was given by the intracranial or systemic route, ANG II caused the most drinking, especially in the dog. With intracranial administration of doses of 100 pmol or more, the differences in dipsogenic effectiveness between TDP renin substrate and ANG I and ANG II tended to disappear. After equipotent doses, the temporal pattern of drinking was similar for the different peptides, and drinking was mostly completed within 15 min of injection. The relative dipsogenic effectiveness (Fig. 7) and temporal pattern in response to intracranial injection were similar in the pigeon (153). A tridecapeptide renin substrate was less effective than TDP renin substrate as an intracerebroventricular dipsogen in the rat (625). In normal (21) or adrenalectomized (206) rats, intracranial injection of renin or TDP renin substrate caused a delayed increase in NaCl intake as well as water within an hour of injection when both fluids were available to drink. The stimulating effects were large and not secondary to renin-induced urinary losses.

D. Angiotensin-(1--7) Heptapeptide

The two angiotensin heptapeptides, ANG-(1--7) and ANG-(2--8), are quite different in their effects on drinking. The thirst-stimulating effect of angiotensin peptides depends critically on the presence of Phe8; very large doses (up to 100 nmol) of ANG-(1--7) given by intracranial injection were almost devoid of dipsogenic activity in the rat (104, 181, 190, 350, 584) (see Fig. 9) and pigeon (see Fig. 7) (153). Apart from it having no stimulating effect on drinking, ANG-(1--7) does not cause aldosterone release, and it has no myotropic or direct pressor actions (468). However, it has been shown to possess excitatory actions on some nervous and other tissues. Angiotensin-(1--7) caused increased PG synthesis in astrocytes and C6 glioma cells with a potency equal to or greater than ANG II (162). In the case of ANG-(1--7)-induced PG synthesis, there was no associated rise in intracellular calcium as there was after ANG II, and the effect could be blocked by the AT2 antagonist CGP-42112A but not by the AT1 antagonist losartan, whereas the ANG II effect on PG synthesis was blocked by both receptor antagonists. Even though a few results with angiotensin antagonists suggest that AT2 receptors may mediate some ANG-(1--7) effects, the grounds for this conclusion are weak. Angiotensin-(1--7) applied microiontophoretically to the PVN excited most neurons, but more weakly than ANG III or ANG II, and the excitatory effects were inhibited by lower concentrations of AT1 antagonists than of AT2 antagonists (8). In the brain, ANG-(1--7) competes less effectively than ANG II for AT1 receptors and even less effectively for AT2 receptors (496). If ANG-(1--7) acts at AT2 (or AT1) receptors, it would have to possess very high efficacy to compensate for the low affinity. It is unlikely, therefore, that ANG-(1--7)-induced responses are mediated by these receptors. Some other as yet uncharacterized angiotensin receptor type may be involved.


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 9.   Top: amounts of water and 1.8% NaCl drunk by Lister hooded rats in 1 h after ICV injections indicated. Bottom: number of c-fos positive nuclei in defined areas of 104 µm2 in OVLT, ventral MnPO nucleus, dorsal MnPO nucleus, and SFO after similar ICV injections in separate groups of rats that were not allowed to drink. Results are means + SE, with number of rats given in parentheses. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01 compared with saline control (top) or corresponding areas of ANG II-treated rats (bottom) by analysis of variance with post hoc Sheffé test. [Redrawn from Mahon et al. (350).]

Angiotensin-(1--7) caused increased release of substance P immunoreactivity from a superfused preparation of hypothalamic tissue (132). It was equipotent with ANG II for vasopressin release from rat hypothalamo-neurohypophysial explants (520), although ANG-(1--7) failed to release vasopressin into the bloodstream of the conscious rat when injected into the lateral cerebral ventricle at 1,000 times the effective molar dose of ANG II (350). It elicited depressor and cardioinhibitory responses similar to those caused by ANG II when microinjected into the dorsal vagal complex of the medulla oblongata of anesthetized rats (85). Angiotensin-(1--7) could lower the blood pressure by competing for ANG II at a pressor site; in the periphery, ANG-(1--7) is an antagonist of AT1 receptors (351), or it could act by releasing PGs in the brain or periphery (236).

Although intracranial ANG-(1--7) has no immediate stimulatory action on thirst or sodium appetite, its actions on PG synthesis are of potential interest because PGs of the E series inhibit thirst, especially ANG II-induced drinking, and it has been suggested that these substances act as natural satiety factors responsible for terminating bouts of drinking (see sect. VIIIK). The same remarks could apply to the effect of ANG-(1--7) on substance P, which in rat is inhibitory to ANG II-induced drinking (see sect. VIIIE). An attractive speculation is that the intensity of thirst (or sodium appetite) depends on a balance between production of stimulatory factors such as ANG II (or ANG III) and inhibitory factors such as ANG-(1--7) (among other potential candidates) and that the relative amounts of these produced change as drinking progresses. Another possibility is that ANG-(1--7) has both stimulatory and inhibitory effects that cancel out. However, there is no evidence at present of an inhibitory or other role in drinking behavior for ANG-(1--7), and these ideas remain speculative.

E. Angiotensin-(2--8) Heptapeptide or Angiotensin III

In contrast to the lack of any short-term stimulatory effect of ANG-(1--7) on drinking, ANG III given by intracranial injection retains considerable dipsogenic activity in the rat (181, 190), pig (411), and pigeon (see Fig. 7) (153), but molar doses must be increased more than 10 times to give water intakes similar to those produced by ANG II in the dose range of 1-100 pmol, and ANG III was ineffective when injected intravenously. It was also a much weaker intracranial, intravenous, and intracarotid dipsogen than ANG II in the dog (194, 195).

It has been argued that ANG III is the biologically significant angiotensin ligand, formed from ANG II before it reacts with angiotensin recognition sites, and that it is responsible for the pressor and dipsogenic activity of ANG II much as it is for ANG II stimulation of aldosterone secretion (673, 678). Angiotensin III binding is tighter and more widely distributed in various brain regions in all species so far examined than is the case for ANG II. In the rat, the dipsogenic and pressor potencies of ANG III and ANG II were similar at intracranial doses below ~10 pmol, and in the gerbil, water intakes were larger after ANG III than after ANG II (679). The dipsogenic responsiveness to ANG II in different species is better correlated with the distribution of binding sites for ANG III than for ANG II. After microiontophoresis of ANG III, neuronal firing rates in the SFO (see sect. VI) of the cat (160) and PVN of the rat (254) were higher than after ANG II. Neuronal firing in the PVN of rat in response to iontophoretically applied ANG II was inhibited by coapplication of amastatin, an aminopeptidase A inhibitor that prevents the conversion of ANG II to ANG III, but the response to ANG III itself was little affected (255). Neuronal firing in response to iontophoretically applied ANG II and ANG III was enhanced by coapplication of bestatin, an aminopeptidase B inhibitor. Bestatin prevents degradation of ANG III to ANG-(3--8) so that this result is also consistent with the idea that ANG III is the important ligand. Neither bestatin nor amastatin affected neuronal firing by itself, although intracerebroventricular bestatin was stated to be dipsogenic (673).

It has been suggested that the greater effectiveness of higher doses of ANG II on drinking, compared with ANG III, depends on the more stable ANG II providing a continuous supply of the more rapidly degraded ANG III; the half-life of ANG III in the lateral ventricle is 6.5 s contrasted with 22.5 s for ANG II (673, 678). At lower doses, the greater stability of ANG II is offset by the greater affinity of angiotensin binding sites for ANG III. The ANG II receptor antagonist saralasin was equally effective at reducing pressor and drinking responses induced by injections of ANG II and ANG III into the lateral ventricle, which could mean that either the two peptides act at a common site or ANG II must be converted to ANG III to serve as the ligand for angiotensin-induced drinking. However, when the peptides were continuously infused into the lateral ventricle instead of being given by bolus injection, water intakes were larger after ANG II than after ANG III in Sprague-Dawley, SH, and WK rats (680). It has also been found that ANG II is a more powerful dipsogen than ANG III when injected into the PVN of the rat (287). It remains to be seen whether ANG III or other angiotensin peptides act as natural ligands instead of or in addition to ANG II.

F. Angiotensin-(3--8) Hexapeptide or Angiotensin IV and Shorter Chain Angiotensin Peptides

In intracranial injection experiments in the rat (181, 190, 626) and pigeon (see Fig. 7) (153), it was found that loss of Arg2 from ANG III to give ANG-(3--8), also known as ANG IV, resulted in a substantial reduction in dipsogenic activity; the importance of Arg2 is also shown by the fact that the D-Arg2-substituted octapeptide was found to be inactive (181). Angiotensin IV binds to AT4 sites that are pharmacologically distinct from AT1 and AT2 sites, having low affinity for ANG II and III and for saralasin. The AT4 sites (Table 4) are expressed in the cerebral cortex, hippocampus, thalamus, basal ganglia, habenula, lateral geniculate, colliculi, central gray, nucleus accumbens, and cerebellum, overlapping with the AT1 and AT2 distribution but with differences. The distribution of AT4 sites in the brain suggests that ANG IV might be involved in learning, memory, and exploratory behavior, possibly being responsible for effects on these functions normally ascribed to ANG II. Whether this has a bearing on some aspects of drinking behavior remains to be investigated.

The pentapeptide ANG-(4--8) and the tetrapeptides ANG-(5--8) and ANG-(1--4) showed little dipsogenic activity in the rat, and then only at much higher dosage than for ANG II (181, 626), and the pigeon (153). In structure-activity studies with angiotensin fragments, the dipsogenic responsiveness to the different fragments (181, 626) was generally similar to their iontophoretic responsiveness, the COOH-terminal sequence being necessary for receptor recognition (160). It is noteworthy that in pigeon, ANG-(1--4) which has tyrosine, an aromatic amino acid similar in structure to phenylalanine, at the COOH-terminal end of the molecule, caused more drinking than ANG-(1--7), which has the aliphatic proline.

G. Comment

It is generally held that among angiotensin peptides the biologically significant ligand for water and NaCl intakes is ANG II, although there is some evidence that ANG III may also be an important dipsogen. Angiotensin-(1--7) is devoid of any immediate stimulatory effect on drinking, although it possess other biological actions, some of which could prove to be significant in drinking behavior though there is no evidence for this at present. The effects of ANG II on thirst and sodium appetite are powerful and widespread, and they occur in most of the large number of mammalian and avian species tested. Angiotensin II involvement in drinking behavior is fully in keeping with its other responses to the physiological demands of hypovolemia. Whether other angiotensin peptides have stimulatory or inhibitory roles in drinking behavior in the short or long term has not been established but remains very much an issue for future study. We can speculate that the precise pattern of drinking response may depend on which peptides are acting and whether they are derived from the circulation or generated locally in the brain.

Angiotensinogen from the different vertebrate groups is remarkably well conserved. The structural requirements for angiotensin analogs to cause thirst and sodium appetite are similar to those for myotropic and pressor actions. Phenylalanine8 at the COOH terminus is essential for most biological activity. The aromatic side groups Tyr4 and His6, the guanidino group of Arg2, and the COOH-terminal carboxyl are involved in angiotensin receptor binding. Analogs of angiotensin with an aliphatic amino acid in place of Phe8 such as saralasin act as competitive antagonists of the dipsogenic actions of ANG II, while retaining a small degree of agonism. Saralasin and similar analogs have been extensively used to investigate the possible participation of angiotensin peptides in the various causes of increased thirst and sodium appetite. Nonpeptide and other peptide-derived receptor subtype-selective antagonists and antisense oligonucleotides are now being increasingly used for the same purpose. Evidence at present points to the AT1 receptor as being significant for the short-term stimulatory action of ANG II on both water intake and NaCl intake, but it has also been suggested that there may be a final common pathway for all types of thirst in which the AT2 receptor is somehow involved. The evidence for this is not strong, but mice lacking the gene encoding the AT2 receptor have an impaired drinking response to water deprivation. There are species differences in the affinities of AT1 and AT2 receptors for specific ligands, and there may also be small differences between the properties of brain receptors and those in the periphery. Among other receptor subtypes have been identified in brain is the AT4 receptor that preferentially binds ANG IV. The possible role of different angiotensin peptides and their receptor subtypes on drinking behavior is unknown, but some of these may prove to be important, perhaps in the long-term organization and modification of neurons responsible for drinking behavior.

    VI. CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM AND ANGIOTENSIN-INDUCED DRINKING
Top
Previous
Next
References

Because ANG II is a powerful dipsogen when injected directly into the brain, it is generally accepted that circulating ANG II stimulates drinking behavior mainly by acting directly on sensitive structures in the central nervous system. It is also becoming increasingly evident that angiotensin peptides generated in situ in the central nervous system may affect drinking behavior by acting on sensitive neurons, some of which may be inaccessible to blood-borne peptide. Evidence just discussed introduces the possibility that analogs of angiotensin other than ANG II may also be involved. The view that the brain monitors the state of the body fluids goes back a long way. Bernard (40) believed that the central nervous system was responsible for maintaining the constancy of the milieu intérieur and that the sensation of thirst played a major part in achieving this by enabling fluid intakes to be matched to fluid losses, but neither he nor his contemporaries were able to state how this was done. The idea of specific receptors in the central nervous system to detect and measure particular aspects of the body's hydrational state owes much to Verney's (637) work on the factors that determine the release of antidiuretic hormone. The concept of hypothalamic osmoreceptors that register cellular water content and control vasopressin release and drinking (666) in response to cellular dehydration is generally accepted, although the anatomic identity and location of such receptors are elusive, and questions concerning their relation to possible sodium-sensitive receptors remain to be explored (54, 55, 336, 373).

Early evidence for the existence of ANG II-sensitive neurons in the central nervous system accessible to circulating peptide was Bickerton and Buckley's (41) finding, published in 1961, that ANG II injected into the arterial supply of the head of a dog in a cross-circulation experiment caused an increase in arterial blood pressure in the rest of the body even though the only connection between head and body was through nerves. In other pioneering experiments at about this time, it was found that pressor responses to infusion of small amounts of ANG II into the vertebral artery of the conscious rabbit exceeded those for intravenous infusion (131). Since then, a large number of behavioral, electrophysiological (158), binding (543, 544), and mapping studies (342) have shown that there are ANG II-sensitive neurons in various parts of the brain. Angiotensin II is a polar molecule unable to penetrate the blood-brain barrier easily. However, many of these neurons were found to be present in highly vascularized nervous structures, the CVOs, where the blood-brain barrier is deficient and that are therefore accessible to circulating polar molecules such as ANG II, although they themselves are isolated from the rest of the brain by other barriers. The neurons of the SFO and OVLT seem to be mainly responsible for drinking in response to circulating ANG II, although the AP may also be involved. Some angiotensin-sensitive structures involved in thirst and sodium appetite lie inside the blood-brain barrier and cannot be reached directly by circulating ANG II. One of the most important of these is the MnPO nucleus in the lamina terminalis. Others are the PVN (287), POA (149, 194), and the central gray of the midbrain (585) to which the POA projects. It is possible that neurons in these structures are stimulated by angiotensin peptides generated in the brain (see sect. VII). In the case of the MnPO nucleus that is close to and has extensive connections with the OVLT, there may be uptake of blood-borne hormone by specialized cells such as tanycytes. The ventral lamina terminalis and surrounding tissue are a crucial part of the limbic system and are a focus for the integration of body fluid homeostasis and blood pressure control.

A. C-fos Expression After Angiotensin

Immunohistochemical identification of the protein products of inducible transcription factors or immediate-early genes (IEGs) such as c-fos and c-jun (274, 326) has been used to map the pattern of activation of neurons in the basal forebrain following various dipsogenic and natriorexigenic stimuli including ANG II. The IEGs are expressed by neurons in response to growth factors, neurotransmitters, or other stimuli, and the protein products of their expression may influence transcription of other genes and function in a variety of signal transduction systems. Intracranial injection of ANG II into conscious rats caused intense c-fos expression in a band of neurons extending through the tissue surrounding the anteroventral third ventricle or AV3V region, including the OVLT and MnPO nucleus (263). There were also high levels of expression in the SFO, SON, and PVN, the lateral division of the central nucleus of the amygdala and the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST). It seems that intracranial ANG II induced highly localized expression of c-fos in areas known to be involved in ANG II-induced drinking. Anatomic differences in c-fos expression were found after injection of ANG II, carbachol, or ANG-(1--7) into the lateral cerebral ventricle (350). The patterns of expression seemed to be related to the differences in drinking behavior induced by the three ligands. Of the two dipsogens, ANG II caused intense c-fos expression in the AV3V region including the OVLT and MnPO nucleus, whereas carbachol caused less expression in the AV3V region but more in the SON and PVN (Figs. 8 and 9). Angiotensin-(1--7), which is nondipsogenic in rats even in large doses (see sect. VD), caused a small amount of staining in the AV3V region. Angiotensin II-induced Fos-like immunoreactivity was prevented by the concurrent administration of losartan, whereas carbachol-induced Fos was mainly unaffected by this except in the MnPO nucleus (503).


View larger version (183K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 8.   C-fos expression after ICV injection of 100 pmol ANG II (1), 500 ng carbachol (2), 1,000 pmol ANG-(1--7) (3), or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) (4) in SFO (a), dorsal median preoptic (MnPO) nucleus (b), ventral MnPO nucleus (c), and organum vasculosum of the lamina terminalis (OVLT) (d). a.c., anterior commisure. [From Mahon et al. (350).]

Conscious rats infused intravenously with ANG II (30-55 pmol·kg-1·min-1), giving physiological increases in plasma levels of ANG II, also showed increased c-fos expression in the SFO and OVLT and in many other hypothalamic and medullary sites, including the BNST, SON, magnocellular and parvocellular PVN, central nucleus of the amygdala, AP, and NTS (374, 429). The pattern was similar after subcutaneous injection of ANG II, with staining in the SFO, OVLT, MnPO nucleus, SON, and PVN, but in these experiments, the amygdala was not stained (324). Sodium depletion, mineralocorticoids, and other causes of increased sodium appetite also cause increased c-fos expression especially in the OVLT as described later (see sect. VID). In rabbit, intravenous infusion of ANG II caused significant increases in the numbers of Fos-positive cell nuclei in the SFO and OVLT, but unlike in the rat, intravenous ANG II causes little drinking (23). Fos staining of neurons in the SFO and OVLT after intravenous ANG II is consistent with the role of ANG II in hemorrhage, since these neurons also show increased c-fos expression after hemorrhage, although this could also be a response to synaptic inputs from elsewhere in the brain (24). Hemorrhage also resulted in c-fos expression in the lamina terminalis, SON, PVN, AP, and NTS.

It is unlikely that c-fos expression is an essential part of ANG II-induced water intake, since the drinking response is largely completed within 15 min of injection, whereas Fos protein is hardly detectable by the end of this time, taking ~60-120 min to reach maximal levels. Herbert (262) has pointed out that induction of c-fos, a transcriptional regulator which then must alter expression of target genes, can hardly be a necessary component of the rapid dipsogenic action of ANG II, and indeed, it is possible to dissociate ANG II-induced drinking and c-fos expression (see sect. VIIIL). These remarks may not apply to the much slower process of ANG II-induced NaCl intake, but other evidence also suggests that the relation between Fos and the act of drinking may be quite loose. When the rats drank water immediately after intracerebroventricular ANG II, c-fos expression was markedly reduced in the SON and magnocellular PVN but not when they drank 0.9% NaCl, which suggests that these structures respond to changes in osmolality rather than to the act of drinking. The high level of ANG II-induced c-fos expression in the AV3V region was, however, unaffected by the fluid drunk. Preloading rats with water through an indwelling gastric cannula prevented rats from drinking in response to ANG II, but the effects on c-fos expression were the same as when rats were allowed to drink; c-fos expression was reduced in the SON and PVN, but there was no detectable effect on expression in the MnPO nucleus, SFO, or OVLT (682). Mapping expression of c-fos and other IEGs allows identification of individually active neurons, possibly provides a measure of second messenger levels, and gives an overall view of the pattern of neural activation in response to ANG II. It is, however, an empirical technique.

B. Circumventricular Organs

The CVOs contain neural elements that have uniquely close contacts with blood and CSF and that connect with other brain regions, enabling the brain to monitor the body fluids in the periphery while at the same time it is protected by the blood-brain barrier against major homeostatic imbalances and harmful substances reaching it in the bloodstream (242). Circumventricular organs are richly vascularized with fenestrated capillaries that allow blood-borne substances such as ANG II to reach and stimulate afferent nerve endings in the pericapillary spaces. They are usefully thought of as lying outside the blood-brain barrier because there are further impediments to the free diffusion of substances into brain tissue beyond them (Fig. 10). Three CVOs, the OVLT, SFO, and AP, have been implicated in body fluid homeostasis and are rich in ANG II receptors. There is much evidence that they play important roles in the control of drinking behavior, renal function, and blood pressure. The AP was regarded as the likely target tissue for the neurogenic pressor response to blood-borne ANG II, and by analogy, it was suggested that the SFO might be concerned in systemic ANG II-induced drinking (182). The importance of the SFO in ANG II-induced drinking was quickly established (539), and early evidence had already implicated the OVLT in body fluid homeostasis (416). The CVOs contain ANG II-sensitive receptors that can be reached and stimulated by ANG II in the bloodstream, although there are also ANG II-sensitive neurons inside the blood-brain barrier that may normally be stimulated by ANG II formed locally in the brain. Angiotensin II may stimulate neurons directly, although some of the evidence has been interpreted in terms of an indirect action secondary to local vasoconstriction (418).


View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 10.   Model of a circumventricular organ (CVO) with a glial barrier. In this case, model is of OVLT that is separated from adjacent MnPO nucleus. Ependyma over OVLT has tight junctions, and substances can only move into OVLT from CSF by uptake at tanycytes. Plasma ANG II has access to OVLT receptors (r), but glial barrier prevents diffusion into MnPO nucleus (x at arrowhead). Cells containing endogenous brain ANG II have been found in OVLT. [From Phillips in Gross (242).]

The CVOs are covered on their cerebral ventricular surface by nonciliated ependymal cells (436). The tight junctions between the cells of the overlying ependyma insulate the CVOs from the CSF; they are absent from the ependyma elsewhere in the ventricles. The blood-brain barrier can be thought of as being shifted to the ependymal layer, creating a blood-CSF barrier to free diffusion (243). Within the ependymal layer are specialized ependymal cells or tanycytes that send processes into the pericapillary spaces of the CVOs. The tanycytic processes sealed by tight junctions isolate the pericapillary spaces from the adjacent brain parenchyma, forming another barrier to free diffusion. The high vascularity and capillary leakiness of CVOs together with the barriers to diffusion that surround them result in the blood-borne messenger molecules being contained within the neuropil, a possible way of improving the efficiency of hormonal transduction. However, ependymal cells show secretory and transport characteristics, and the tanycytes themselves are in contact with both CSF and blood. It is possible to envisage exchange of substances between the CSF and pericapillary space so that receptors could be accessible to both CSF-borne and blood-borne ANG II; for example, ANG II injected or generated inside the blood-brain barrier could be transported by the tanycytes to sensitive structures such as the OVLT outside the barrier and stimulate drinking by acting on these structures. Similarly, circulating ANG II may reach and stimulate the MnPO nucleus and other sensitive structures inside the barrier.

C. Anteroventral Third Ventricular Region and Lamina Terminalis

The tissue surrounding the anteroventral third ventricle in the anterior hypothalamus and ventral portion of the lamina terminalis, the AV3V region, plays a key role in body fluid homeostasis. The lamina terminalis contains three structures the OVLT, MnPO nucleus, and, at its upper boundary, the SFO, all of which are extremely sensitive to the dipsogenic action of ANG II. It has extensive connections with the hypothalamus and other limbic structures that allow information about the milieu intérieur to be processed and translated into appropriate behavior. Andersson (9) produced unequivocal evidence that the anterior hypothalamus is important for controlling drinking behavior. Nicolaïdis (416) in an electrophysiological study in the cat was the first to suggest that structures in the median and anterior hypothalamus in the region of the suprachiasmatic nucleus serve as a receptive and integrative center for cardiovascular and body fluid regulation. Using concentric bipolar microelectrodes, he found that there was increased integrated unit activity in this region in response to a fall in blood pressure produced by either distension of the carotid sinus or removal of blood. Neurons responding to hypovolemia have been found at a "carrefour" of structures responding to blood volume and pressure, osmolality, temperature, and gustatory signals in the cat and rat (416, 607). Iontophoretic application of ANG II, vasopressin, ANP, and mineralocorticoids, hormones involved in the regulation of fluid and electrolyte balance, influences the activity of neurons located here (609, 610). Neurons sensitive to the iontophoretic application of ANG II and aldosterone have been identified in the medial septum and in and around the MnPO nucleus, and these neurons show greater and more prolonged responses after pretreatment with systemic DOCA (611). This could be the electrophysiological basis for the synergism between ANG II and mineralocorticoids in arousing sodium appetite (207).

Lesioning evidence supports the view that the AV3V region serves as an integrative center for cardiovascular and body fluid regulation (71, 293, 343-345). Lesions in rat resulted in attenuated pressor responses to centrally acting agents, failure to develop most forms of experimental hypertension, and impaired function of fluid intake and fluid output controls, leading to severe dehydration and hypernatremia. The effects of different thirst challenges were variably attenuated depending on the stimulus, but drinking in response to ANG II by intracranial or subcutaneous injection or to intracranial renin was abolished (73, 120, 292). The AV3V region contains the OVLT and MnPO nucleus just dorsal to it, and it continues upward into the anterodorsal lamina terminalis that contains the SFO. The OVLT and SFO may be important for drinking responses to blood-borne ANG II, but the presence of rich connections between them and the MnPO nucleus makes it difficult to quantify their respective contributions (449). The MnPO nucleus is crucial for ANG II-induced drinking responses, and there are extensive two-way connections between it and the many adjacent structures, including the SFO, OVLT, anterior hypothalamus, periventricular preoptic region, and the medial and lateral POAs (Fig. 11). These are the structures that show intense c-fos expression after ANG II (see sect. VIAA). It is claimed that injection of ANG II into MnPO nucleus near the OVLT causes increased intakes of both water and NaCl, but injection into the SFO causes only water intake (173). However, damage to the SFO may impair sodium depletion-induced sodium intake.


View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 11.   A: a midsagittal section of rat brain showing most of afferent and efferent projections of lamina terminalis (stippled area). Direction of pathways is indicated by arrows, and reciprocal projections are denoted by double arrows. B: Angiotensinergic (solid lines) and catecholaminergic (dotted lines) pathways projecting to and from lamina terminalis. Note presence of intrinsic angiotensinergic neurons in SFO. Arc, arcuate nucleus; BNST, bed nucleus stria terminalis; Cg, cingulate cortex; CG, central gray; CM, central medial thalamic nucleus; DG, dentate gyrus; DMH, dorsal medial hypothalmus; DR, dorsal raphe; DTg, dorsal tegmentum; IL, infralimbic cortex; LC, locus ceruleus; LH/PFA, lateral hypothalamus perifornical area; LPBN, lateral parabrachial nucleus; LS, lateral septum; MnPO nucleus, median preoptic nucleus; MnR, medial raphe; MPO, medial preoptic nucleus; MS, medial septum; NTS, nucleus solitary tract; OVLT, organum vasculosum lamina terminalis; PV, paraventricular nucleus of thalamus; PVN, paraventricular nucleus hypothalamus; Re, reuniens nucleus; SI, substantial innominata; SON, supraoptic nucleus; VLM, ventrolateral medulla; ZI, zona incerta. [From Oldfield in Ramsay and Booth (462).]

From the anterior third ventricle region and anterior hypothalamus there are projections to the SON and PVN and a pathway courses down to the brain stem. There are numerous projections to other parts of the limbic system. The OVLT, MnPO nucleus, and SFO contain moderate- to high-density ANG II immunoreactive neurons, the distribution of which corresponds well with ANG II binding sites (342). The AV3V region and especially the MnPO nucleus also receive ascending noradrenergic and other inputs from cell groups in the NTS and the various structures in the brain stem that are concerned in monitoring blood volume and pressure (289).

Angiotension II-sensitive neurons have also been identified in the walls of the cavity of the septum pellucidum (417). These neurons line a hollow sagittal structure that in the rat consists of a horizontal horn lying in the septum below the corpus callosum and a vertical horn that extends down from the genu, overlying the anterior aspect of the lamina terminalis as far as the OVLT. The cavities of the two horns communicate freely with each other but not with the subarachnoid or cerebroventricular spaces. The structure, called the organum cavum prelamina terminalis or OCPLT, is extremely responsive to the dipsogenic action of ANG II injected into it. When water and 3.0% NaCl were offered, water was drunk but the NaCl intake was unaffected. The effect was blocked by losartan but not by CGP-42112A so that the angiotensin receptor type is AT1, the same as for angiotensin-induced drinking responses elsewhere (146). It is possible that blood-borne ANG II may reach and stimulate the OCPLT through a highly vascular dorsoventral network that lines its vertical horn. The significance of the OCPLT in ANG II-induced drinking and its separate identity from other angiotensin-sensitive structures in the vicinity have yet to be established.

D. Organum Vasculosum of the Lamina Terminalis

The OVLT is a remarkably vascularized structure possessing fenestrated capillaries, numerous glial, tanycytic and neural processes, small neurons, and many peptidergic nerve terminals. It lies in the ventral portion of the lamina terminalis in the tissue surrounding the AV3V region. The OVLT in rat possess high-affinity ANG II binding sites (383), and it has been shown by microiontophoresis to contain angiotensin-responsive neurons (158). High-affinity binding sites are also found in the OVLT of the dog (552) and sheep (376). Although it is clear that the AV3V region is involved in ANG II-induced drinking, the part played by the OVLT itself in this response is less certain. Tissue in the region of the AV3V or suprachiasmatic recess is extremely sensitive to the dipsogenic action of ANG II (418, 448, 449). Early experiments showing reduced drinking and pressor responses to intracerebroventricular ANG II after covering the ventricular surface of the OVLT with cream were interpreted as meaning that the OVLT responds to changes in the levels of ANG II in the CSF (266). However, injections into the AV3V seem as likely to affect structures inside the blood-brain barrier as the OVLT, which is protected on its ependymal surface by tight junctions. The MnPO nucleus is an obvious target because it is rich in angiotensinergic nerve terminals and ANG II-sensitive cells (342). In the rat (149) and dog (194), injection of ANG II restricted to the POA, i.e., adjacent to the MnPO nucleus and inside the blood-brain barrier, elicits drinking. However, the OVLT shows intense c-fos expression after intracranial as well as systemic administration of ANG II so that it is clearly influenced by ANG II in the CSF (see sect. VIA). After the peripheral natriorexigenic challenges of subcutaneous implantation of DOCA pellets, or dietary or furosemide-induced sodium depletion, the increased c-fos expression was more restricted than after ANG II, being confined mainly to the OVLT (324). This suggests that it may play a key role in sodium appetite in the rat even though the relation between NaCl intake and c-fos in the OVLT was not quantitative (94). Other structures in the central nervous system are also involved.

Lesions of the AV3V region eliminated drinking in response to peripheral ANG II and isoproterenol in the rat (343, 345), but a more restricted lesion confined to the OVLT, or infusion of sarthran into it, did not affect isoproterenol-induced drinking (172). In sheep, near-complete ablation of the anteroventral wall of the third ventricle, including the OVLT and adjacent tissue but usually leaving the SFO intact, abolished drinking in response to intracarotid infusion of ANG II (378, 379). In the dog, lesions confined to the tip of the optic recess, destroying most of the OVLT, resulted in markedly reduced drinking in response to intravenous infusion of ANG II (612). The obvious interpretation, that drinking fails because of loss of a specific role for the OVLT or MnPO nucleus in ANG II-induced drinking, may be too simple. The lesion could have destroyed vital neural pathways from the SFO or other structures involved in drinking behavior, although this is unlikely in view of the widespread distribution of connections between the CVOs and hypothalamic structures involved in water balance. A more likely reason for variable results in lesion experiments is that the OVLT and/or MnPO nucleus serve several functions and respond to more than one stimulus. For example, in dogs, drinking and vasopressin release in response to systemic hyperosmotic NaCl were disrupted by lesions of the OVLT (613), which suggests that the OVLT is an important site for osmoreceptors. Similar results were obtained in sheep after large lesions of the anterior wall of the third ventricle (377), and in rat after AV3V lesions. Loss of osmoreceptor function after lesioning might be expected to have the same effect as a water load because in each case the stimulatory nerve outputs from the osmoreceptors that cause drinking and vasopressin release would be reduced. Failure of intravenous ANG II-induced drinking and vasopressin release after ablation of the OVLT might therefore have been a consequence of loss of osmoreceptors rather than of specific angiotensin receptors.

Although the OVLT is a major site for osmoreceptors, osmosensitivity is more widespread than this (54, 55). There appears to be significant osmosensitivity in the SFO of the rat, since ablation results in some reduction in osmotically induced water intake (271) and marked disruption in vasopressin release (353). Earlier experiments on drinking responses to intracranial injections of hyperosmolal solutions in conscious rats indicated that osmosensitivity was diffusely distributed in the basal forebrain region, POAs, and anterior parts of the hypothalamus (49, 442). Osmosensitive cells have been found in the hypothalamus of conscious monkeys injected with hypertonic NaCl, and the firing rate of these cells decreased when the monkey drank water (642). Magnocellular neurons in the SON are sensitive to osmotic stimulation (336), and this is confirmed by selective c-fos expression in response to drinking solutions of different osmolalities. It is scarcely possible to avoid damaging osmosensitive tissue when lesions are made in an angiotensin-sensitive region containing osmosensitive cells, and it could be argued that it is the loss of tonic discharge from osmoreceptors that interferes with ANG II-induced drinking rather than the loss of ANG II-sensitive cells per se. However, even though a mistakenly perceived hyposmolality after ablation of one or other CVO might account for failure to drink, this does not rule out the possibility that the intact CVO responds both to increases in circulating ANG II and to plasma hyperosmolality.

E. Subfornical Organ

Of the three CVOs that have been implicated in ANG II-induced drinking behavior, the SFO is thought to be the principal site for the stimulating effect of systemic ANG II on water intake in rat and dog, although the OVLT may also be important. Morphological and metabolic changes occur in the SFO during dehydration (576). Routtenberg and Simpson (494) found that direct application of carbachol to the SFO caused increased water intake in the rat. Because there are negligible amounts of circulating acetylcholine, this result has no direct bearing on SFO responses to blood-borne molecules, but the SFO was also found to be very sensitive to the dipsogenic action of ANG II, responding to femtomole doses injected directly into it (537, 539). It is a matter for speculation whether there would have been the dual response of increased intakes of NaCl as well as water had both fluids been available to drink as has been described for AV3V injections of ANG II (173). However, the SFO may be implicated in sodium appetite in the rat because NaCl intake after furosemide-induced sodium depletion was decreased by damage to the SFO, although other brain areas are clearly involved because low dosage of captopril, which increases the ANG I reaching the brain (see sect. IXC), prevented the decrease (656).

The SFO protrudes into the third ventricle at the level of the interventricular foramina of Monro where the crura of the fornix begin to diverge. It is derived from the ependyma at the boundary of the tela choroidea and lamina terminalis. It has extensive reciprocal connections with the MnPO nucleus and OVLT in the AV3V region and, like the OVLT, it sends projections to the SON and PVN (119, 241, 390). The SFO is composed of a variety of small neurons and their processes, glial cells, and tanycytic ependymal cells. It contains a close network of fenestrated capillaries which in places appear to merge with the nearby choroid plexus. The fenestrations make the neurons in the perivascular spaces highly accessible to blood-borne ANG II and other circulating molecules. The SFO contains a dense plexus of ANG II immunoreactive nerve fibers, including an angiotensinergic input from the lateral hypothalamus, and angiotensinergic efferents projecting to the MnPO nucleus, OVLT, BNST, infralimbic cortex, PVN, and further afield to the midbrain raphé system (342). Angiotensin II-responsive neurons, identified by measuring neuronal discharge after the direct or microiontophoretic application of ANG II, or in response to intravenous ANG II, are present in the SFO (158). Discharge by these cells was blocked by saralasin, whereas other less selective neurons that responded to acetylcholine as well as to ANG II were unaffected. Because spontaneous firing of these neurons fell when saralasin was applied, it has been suggested that their activity depends on tonic release of angiotensin peptides derived from the action of brain renin, but this is uncertain.

Destruction of the SFO results in the loss of drinking in response to intravenous ANG II in rat (1, 540), dog (615), opossum (165), and Japanese quail (592) and to intraperitoneal ANG II in pigeon (359, 360). But in sheep, the SFO does not appear to be involved in drinking in response to intracarotid infusion of ANG II (378, 379). In the rat, destruction of the SFO or infusion of sarthran into it also caused a fall in the amount drunk in response to isoproterenol (172). On the face of it, blood-borne ANG II-induced drinking is mediated mainly by the OVLT and adjacent tissue in sheep and by the SFO in rat, opossum, quail, and pigeon. In the rat, both CVOs show intense c-fos expression after intracranial and systemic administration of ANG II (see sect. VIA), and this was also true of the rabbit, an equivocal responder to the dipsogenic effect of ANG II (see sect. III). In the dog, ablation of the OVLT also attenuated intravenous ANG II-induced drinking (612) so that compatible with the present evidence is a role for both the SFO and OVLT in dog. However, as already discussed, the obvious interpretation, that drinking fails after ablation of a CVO because ANG II-sensitive receptors have been destroyed, is not necessarily the entire explanation. The CVOs subserve other functions, and it could be that the loss of these functions accounts for the reduction in ANG II-induced drinking. In the case of OVLT lesions, we saw (sect. VID) that loss of the drinking response to intravenous ANG II could have been caused partly by a mistaken perception of hyposmolality owing to destruction of osmoreceptors, although this does not rule out the possibility that there are also ANG II-induced responses from the intact OVLT. The SFO of rat is also osmosensitive, but the argument of dilutional inhibition to explain the loss of drinking after destruction of the OVLT can be discounted in the case of SFO lesions. This is because saralasin applied directly to the SFO of rat attenuated drinking in response to intravenous ANG II in a dose-dependent fashion, without affecting drinking in response to peripheral hypertonic NaCl (537). A similar type of selective blocking experiment on the OVLT against circulating ANG II has not been described. The result might be different from the SFO result because infusion of sarthran into the OVLT did not affect isoproterenol-induced drinking (172).

F. Amygdala

Much evidence, most of it from the rat, suggests that the amygdala plays an important part in sodium appetite, including that induced by ANG II. It is ideally suited to this purpose because it receives olfactory, gustatory, and visceral inputs and has extensive connections with the preoptic, hypothalamic, and hindbrain regions (122, 523). Bilateral lesions of the amygdala result in exaggerated affective responses and a general perceptual deficit so that the rats fail to be alerted by novelty (413). In the case of sodium appetite, absence of neophobia means a deficiency in the learning of taste aversions. Chiaraviglio (95) found that damage to the amygdala, BNST, or ventral amygdalofugal pathway impairs or abolishes the increased NaCl intake that follows sodium depletion induced by peritoneal dialysis. It has been suggested that the amygdala and BNST were once a single structure that has become separated by the internal capsule (292). The idea of an "extended amygdala" makes it reasonable to envisage an integrative function in sodium appetite with, for example, the possibility of both stimulatory and inhibitory roles. Multiple roles could explain some of the conflicting results that have been obtained.

The amygdala is also one of the regions of the brain with the highest uptake of aldosterone, a property it shares with the septum and hippocampus (see sect. IIC) (402). After damage to the medial region of the amygdala, rats failed to increase their NaCl intake in response to mineralocorticoid but remained responsive to the natriorexigenic effects of captopril (see sect. IXC) and sodium depletion (424, 524, 689). Bilateral injections of mineralocorticoid receptor antisense oligonucleotides into the amygdala (500 ng each side) inhibited the increase in NaCl intake caused by subcutaneous DOCA (2.5 mg) but not the increase following adrenalectomy; glucocorticoid receptor antisense or scrambled oligonucleotides had no effect on the increased NaCl intake (512). In an abstract, it was reported that bilateral adrenal steroid implants in the amygdala caused an increase in intake of NaCl but not water (472). On the other hand, in one experiment, there was no significant c-fos expression in the amygdala after subcutaneous implantation of DOCA pellets which, however, resulted in c-fos expression in the OVLT (324). In experiments on the role of the central nervous system in mineralocorticoid hypertension, it was stated, although no results of fluid intake were given, that the "salient difference between the hypertension in the ICV aldosterone model and that of natural or induced mineralocorticoid excess is the absence of saline polydipsia and polyuria in the animals receiving aldosterone ICV" (235). Polydipsia/polyuria occurred only with systemic and not intracerebroventricular administration of aldosterone, perhaps because aldosterone was not placed directly in the amygdala, but it was given by intracerebroventricular infusion, which could mean that mineralocorticoid was not reaching the critical target tissue in sufficient amounts to arouse sodium appetite.

Angiotension II immunoreactivity is found in the amygdala and BNST (342). The central nucleus of the amygdala contains angiotensinergic endings and receptors as well as mineralocorticoid receptors and has been proposed as a possible site of interaction between ANG II and mineralocorticoids in generating an increase in sodium appetite (523). Lesions here result in impairment of the NaCl intake caused both by intracerebroventricular injection of renin and subcutaneous injection of DOCA (225). Lesions of the central nucleus of the amygdala or BNST also caused impairment of NaCl intake in response to furosemide-induced or yohimbine-induced sodium depletion, circumstances in which the renin-angiotensin system is activated (688). As we saw, the central nucleus showed c-fos expression after intracerebroventricular or intravenous injection of ANG II (although not after subcutaneous ANG II). The NK-3 selective tachykinins (see sect. VIIIE) injected into the medial amygdala inhibited intracerebroventricular renin-induced but not subcutaneous DOCA-induced sodium appetite. However, whatever the role of the amygdala in ANG II/mineralocorticoid interaction, the ventral lamina terminalis containing the MnPO nucleus and OVLT is more important than the amygdala for ANG II-induced sodium appetite. Injection of ANG II into the POA, MnPO nucleus, or OVLT, but not the SFO, caused an increase in intake of NaCl as well as water (20, 173), and lesions of the AV3V region that damage the MnPO nucleus and OVLT impaired the natriorexigenic action of intracerebroventricular renin or ANG II more than that of subcutaneous mineralocorticoid treatment (523). This region contains neurons that show increased and prolonged discharges to ANG II after DOCA pretreatment. The AV3V region is also the region that shows the greatest c-fos expression accompanying the increased sodium appetite caused by intracerebroventricular or systemic ANG II, or dietary or furosemide-induced sodium depletion.

G. Brain Stem and Area Postrema

The AP is adjacent to and projects strongly into the NTS at the transition of the fourth ventricle and central canal of the spinal cord (391). It is richly supplied with fenestrated capillaries that appear to merge with the vessels of the nearby choroid plexus. The ventricular surface is covered by differentially penetrable ependyma with tanycytes that have slender processes ending on the capillaries. The AP is implicated in the neurogenic pressor response to circulating ANG II and in fluid homeostasis including drinking behavior. The AP and caudal NTS receive vascular stretch receptor inputs from the carotid sinus, aortic arch, pulmonary vasculature, venoatrial junctions, and heart. Chemoreceptors and the receptors originating in the liver provide other sources of afferent inputs. The AP may also play a role in taste, control of feeding behavior, and vomiting, but these are not considered here. Direct application of ANG II to the AP causes a rise in blood pressure and also an increase in NaCl intake, but effects on the adjacent NTS system are more complicated and depend on dose and the structures affected. Application of low doses of ANG II to the NTS system produces a decrease in blood pressure, but higher doses are pressor (77). Angiotensin II is depressor when applied to the dorsal motor nucleus of vagus.

In rats, lesions of the AP and the caudal NTS immediately adjacent to it resulted in larger increases in water intake than in unlesioned rats in response to subcutaneous isoproterenol or hypovolemia induced by hyperoncotic dialysis with polyethylene glycol (see sect. XC) (138). However, drinking responses to systemic hypertonic NaCl or intracranial carbachol (see sect. VIIIA) were unaffected by these lesions. In some cases, excessive drinking after AP lesions may have been caused by primary renal fluid losses, since these may have been excessive (278), but others have not observed excessive losses (101, 650). Bilateral lesions in the LPBN, to which the AP and NTS make substantial secondary projections, produced by electrolytic lesions or injection of ibotenic acid which destroys neurons but spares the fibers passing through the nucleus, caused similar alterations in drinking behavior, with enhancement of the water intake caused by intracerebroventricular or systemic ANG II, or by isoproterenol, but not that caused by systemic hypertonic NaCl or intracerebroventricular carbachol (137, 426, 427). Intake of NaCl is also affected by lesions of the AP/NTS system. When water and NaCl were freely available, rats increased their spontaneous intake of NaCl after destruction of the AP and immediately adjacent NTS (101, 650). Intake was greatest when lesions were restricted to the AP with minimal damage to the NTS. However, in contrast to their effects on water intake, LPBN lesions did not affect NaCl intake. When challenged with systemic ANG II, rats drank increased amounts of NaCl after destruction of the AP, or if NaCl was not available, more water (651). The large spontaneous intake of NaCl was unaffected by saralasin injected subcutaneously or into the lateral ventricle, although these treatments diminished drinking in response to systemic ANG II. On the other hand, prolonged administration of ANG II into the intact AP also caused rats to increase their NaCl intake, presumably by stimulating neurons directly; the effect was greater when the capillary tip lay in the anterolateral zone of the AP than in the anteromedial zone, and it was less when the tip lay in the fourth ventricle.

The neuroanatomic studies by Johnson and Thunhorst (292) have clarified our understanding of the central pathways for extracellular volume control. Much of the functional and anatomic evidence suggests that the AP, immediately adjacent NTS, and LPBN are part of the system that monitors extracellular fluid volume on the basis of vascular stretch receptor information and circulating ANG II levels, sending this information via ascending noradrenergic and other pathways to the AV3V region, and in particular to the MnPO nucleus, and to many other forebrain sites including SFO, PVN, SON, and amygdala (see Fig. 11). Reduced filling in the volume receptors in the heart and large veins and the arterial baroreceptors results in a fall in inhibitory traffic from vascular stretch receptors (197, 614). This activates the ascending noradrenergic pathways and norepinephrine released in the region of the ventral lamina terminalis (see sect. VIII) facilitates ANG II effects and leads to stimulation of the circulation, increased drinking behavior, and vasopressin release. There is also evidence of ascending serotonergic pathways that are inhibitory, and these are less active in hypovolemia and hypotension. There are probably other neurotransmitter pathways involved as well. The integrated activity in these various ascending facilitatory and inhibitory pathways will presumably depend on the level of cardiovascular receptor traffic and will determine drinking behavior and circulatory homeostasis. The selective enhancement of drinking caused by ANG II and other hypovolemic stimuli after lesions of the AP/NTS/LPBN system suggests that the inhibitory pathways are dominant or at least most affected by these lesions. The enhancement could therefore be explained by the increased effectiveness of responses from angiotensin receptors elsewhere in the brain, owing to removal of an inhibitory feedback. A similar explanation could apply to the angiotensin contribution to increased drinking in hypovolemia where the inhibitory feedback is also removed, but in this case by circulatory underfilling. The mechanism for increased NaCl intake produced by direct stimulation of the AP by ANG II is clearly different but could also contribute to the overall ANG II-induced increase in drinking.

H. Comment

The CVOs, MnPO nucleus, and tissue surrounding the anterior third ventricle in the lamina terminalis provide the neuroanatomic focus for thirst, sodium appetite, and cardiovascular control. The SFO, OVLT, and AP contain ANG II-sensitive receptors accessible to blood-borne hormone that are mainly responsible for dipsogenic, natriorexigenic, and other effects of circulating ANG II. Other ways in which circulating ANG II might cause or modify drinking, such as by acting on vascular stretch receptors or peripheral chemoreceptors, or indirectly by changing the excretion or internal distribution of fluid and electrolytes, have not been ruled out. Some of the controversy about the natriorexigenic effect of systemic ANG II revolves around the extent to which ANG II-induced NaCl intake is the consequence of ANG II-induced natriuresis (see sect. IVA2). In hypovolemia, it is possible that increases in circulating ANG II alter the setting of vascular stretch receptors making the vessel wall in which they are located less compliant to stretch. This would result in a reduction in inhibitory sensory discharge and therefore in increased drinking. More speculative still is the possible involvement of peripheral chemoreceptors in ANG II-induced drinking. There is some evidence that chemoreceptors may be involved in altered drinking behavior, although the evidence for this is sparse (269) and difficult to interpret. It is conceivable that ANG IIinduced alterations in blood flow to peripheral chemoreceptors may be involved in angiotensin-induced drinking behavior.

The CVOs have many connections with other regions of the brain. The SFO and OVLT project directly and via the MnPO nucleus and periventricular tissue to the preoptic, anterior hypothalamic, and limbic structures to initiate drinking, and to the SON and PVN to mediate release of vasopressin and oxytocin from the neurohypophysis and from vasopressinergic and oxytocinergic nerve endings. In addition to its connections with the forebrain CVOs, the AV3V region receives inputs from the AP, immediately adjacent NTS, LPBN, and other brain stem structures that form part of the negative-feedback system for extracellular fluid volume control. This serves to monitor blood volume and provides the signal, reinforced by circulating ANG II, to cause increased intakes of water and NaCl in hypovolemia. Direct application of ANG II to the AP also arouses sodium appetite. Both the AV3V region and amygdala are crucial in the control of sodium appetite. Olfactory, gustatory, and visceral inputs project to ANG II- and aldosterone-sensitive tissue in the AV3V region, amygdala, and BNST. It has been suggested that the amygdala is important in mineralocorticoid-induced sodium appetite, and it could also be a site of interaction between ANG II and mineralocorticoids.

There are many ANG II-sensitive receptors inside the blood-brain barrier, notably in the MnPO nucleus. Some of these could have a particular role to play in sodium appetite. Angiotensin II-sensitive structures inside the blood-brain barrier may normally be stimulated by ANG II generated locally by components of a brain renin-angiotensin system. This view is compatible with the finding that intracranial injections of renin, TDP renin substrate, or ANG I in rat, dog, and pigeon cause increased drinking and that this does not occur if formation of ANG II at the injection site is prevented by prior intracranial injection of appropriate blockers in amounts insufficient to affect components of the renin-angiotensin in the bloodstream (see sect. VB). However, the relation between ANG II-sensitive structures on either side of the blood-brain barrier in drinking behavior is uncertain. The idea that circulating ANG II contributes to hypovolemic thirst and sodium appetite is straightforward and supported by the evidence, although lacking quantitative precision. Less well understood is the possible role of angiotensin peptides generated inside the blood-brain barrier in drinking behavior, which is discussed next.

    VII. ROLE OF ANGIOTENSIN PEPTIDES FORMED FROM PRECURSORS IN BRAIN IN DRINKING
Top
Previous
Next
References

Renin and angiotensinogen genes are expressed in many organs other than kidney; these include salivary gland (see sect. IIIA4), brain, pituitary, adrenal cortex, heart, vascular smooth muscle, ovary, and testis (135, 453). The amounts of renin found in brain are unaffected by nephrectomy, which shows that nervous tissue can synthesize renin independently of the kidney (171, 229, 230). Functional and neuroanatomic evidence indicates that angiotensin receptors for increased drinking behavior exist inside the blood-brain barrier as well as outside. Because ANG II probably cannot cross the barrier, it is reasonable to suppose that ANG II-sensitive neurons inside the barrier are normally stimulated by peptide derived from angiotensin precursors made in the central nervous system. Hypovolemia causes an increase in hypothalamic ANG II, and sodium restriction causes some increase in ANG II binding, suggesting that the brain renin-angiotensin system is functionally responsive to altered physiological demands. Brain renin itself may not be responsible for local formation of angiotensin peptides because mRNAs for renin and angiotensinogen are distributed differently in nervous tissue, and the amounts of renin are very small. Other enzymes may be responsible. Much of the evidence favors involvement of brain angiotensin peptides in body fluid homeostasis, thirst, sodium appetite, and blood pressure control, but there are unanswered questions about the extent and nature of the involvement.

A. Components and Distribution

Various components of the renin-angiotensin system are present in different parts of the brain, but sites of production, concentrations, and location of components in relation to angiotensin receptors present some puzzles. Not all components are necessarily found in any one place, and important topological mismatches have been identified (77, 78). The distribution of renin mRNA and renin is not well characterized and has been described as "the missing link" in the anatomy of the brain renin-angiotensin system (77). In some areas, all components are present but high-affinity ANG II binding sites are absent. This might mean that other angiotensin analogs are produced and exert physiological effects by acting on their specific binding sites. The presence of angiotensinogen mRNA in astrocytes suggests that extracellular processing of angiotensinogen and diffusion of biologically active angiotensin peptides to specific receptors on neurons nearby may take place. However, topological mismatches do not occur in brain regions responsible for body fluid homeostasis and cardiovascular control and where the functional ligand is presumably ANG II. Hypothalamic and limbic structures concerned in the control of fluid balance and release of hormones, and the brain stem/NTS system for extracellular fluid volume control, have high concentrations of all renin-angiotensin components closely associated with high-affinity ANG II binding sites.

Brain renin has been localized intracellularly in neurons and neuroglia of humans, dogs, rats, mice, rabbits, pigs, sheep, and cattle. The concentrations are low, and there are marked variations in amounts in different brain regions and between species (231, 342). In the pig, brain renin is widely distributed throughout the central nervous system and resembles renal renin in its physical, enzymatic, and immunological properties; it is true renin and not cathepsin D-like acid protease (265). A specific renin mRNA has been identified in rat and mouse brains by hybridization techniques (136), suggesting that renin is synthesized in the brain, although Ganten and colleagues (231, 342) have stated that final proof of this will require cell-free translation of brain mRNA, identification of the newly synthesized protein as renin, and characterization of the mRNA/cDNA or cRNA hybrids. The low levels of mRNA isolated from brain tissue may not be derived from neural elements but from endothelial cells in the cerebral vessels or choroid plexus (162).

Angiotensinogen is present in high concentration in CSF. With the use of recombinant DNA techniques and cell-free translation of mRNA, angiotensinogen identical to that synthesized in liver has been found in rat brain (87). Large amounts of angiotensinogen mRNA are found in the forebrain and medulla of the rat, with astrocytes being the chief or even exclusive source (559). However, small amounts may be expressed in neurons (453). Although angiotensinogen mRNA may largely be confined to neuroglia, angiotensinogen itself is found both in neuroglia and neurons. The scarcity or even absence of mRNA for angiotensinogen in neurons presumably means that neuronal angiotensinogen comes mainly from the astrocytes, although the possible existence of a mechanism of neuronal uptake after formation and release of the peptide by astrocytes remains to be investigated (77, 78). Angiotensinogen mRNA is also expressed by human astrocytes, but astrocytes expressing the gene for angiotensinogen failed under the same conditions to show the presence of mRNAs encoding either renin or ACE (162). Glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid treatment caused increases in angiotensinogen mRNA in presumed astrocytes in the anterior hypothalamus, POA, PVN, SON, suprachiasmatic nucleus, and periventricular nucleus, whereas adrenalectomy had the reverse effect (505). This could explain the synergism between ANG II and mineralocorticoids in arousing sodium appetite (see sect. II). Where angiotensinogen is processed once it is synthesized and what other peptides are formed are uncertain. Extracellular processing is certainly possible, but angiotensinogen may also be taken up for intraneuronal processing, giving rise to angiotensin peptides that do not necessarily depend on renin for their formation. Which of the angiotensin peptides formed locally will presumably be governed by which enzymes are present in the particular tissue (see Fig. 1).

Angiotensin converting enzyme is widely distributed in the brain, with high concentrations found in choroid plexus, SFO, caudate-putamen, substantia nigra, globus pallidus, and ME; it is found inside neurons as well as on blood vessels (231, 342). There may be more than one isoform of ACE (691). Angiotensin II and ACE immunoreactivities are not codistributed (67), which could mean that angiotensin peptides are formed by enzymatic pathways that are independent of ACE. For example, ANG-(1--7) is produced directly from ANG I through action of prolyl endopeptidase in brain tissue, and some of the actions of angiotensin peptides in the central nervous system may be mediated by it (see sect. VD). In some tissues, the responses to ANG I are not completely blocked by ACE inhibitors, showing that other enzymes capable of forming ANG II from ANG I are present, including the serine proteases, kallikrein, tonin, and chymase (15, 35, 276).

Angiotensin I, ANG II, and ANG III have been extracted from the brains of nephrectomized rats, rabbits, and primates in amounts that again highlight the question of whether brain renin alone is responsible for generating angiotensin peptides, or whether other proteases or even renal renin taken up by glia or tanycytes may not also play a part (162). The amino acid sequences of rat brain angiotensins are the same as those of plasma angiotensins; identical peptides were cleaved from brain and plasma angiotensinogen by renin (228). Immunohistochemical techniques have shown that ANG II is widely distributed throughout the central nervous system (Fig. 12). In contrast to angiotensinogen, ANG II seems to be located exclusively in neurons. Angiotensin II immunoreactivity in varying amounts has been detected in the cerebral cortex, hippocampal formation, basal ganglia, cerebellum, lateral geniculate nucleus, and spinal cord, as well as in the nervous structures more directly concerned in the control of body fluids such as the ventral lamina terminalis, medial and lateral POAs, anterior hypothalamus, amygdala and BNST, lateral septum, other forebrain limbic structures, and the medulla oblongata (77, 78, 342, 630).


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 12.   Distribution of ANG II immunoreactivity and ANG II receptor binding in a midline sagittal section of rat brain. Shading represents receptors; solid circles and lines from them represent cells and axons. AP, area postrema; HIPP, hippocampus; LC, locus ceruleus, ME, median eminence; MnPO nucleus, median preoptic nucleus; NTS, nucleus tractus solitarius; OVLT, organum vasculosum laminae terminalis; PVN, paraventricular nucleus; SEPT, septum; SC, superior colliculus; SCN, suprachiasmatic nucleus; SON, supraoptic nucleus; STH, subthalamic nucleus. [From Phillips in Harding et al. (256).]

B. Possible Functions

There are uncertainties about the functions of brain angiotensin peptides, how they act, and their relation to circulating ANG II. In addition to actions on thirst, sodium appetite, and blood pressure control, ANG II affects cell growth, membrane function, protein synthesis, PG release, pituitary hormone synthesis and release, and learning and memory (231, 406, 675). Different angiotensin receptors (see sect. VB3) may mediate opposing effects on cell proliferation and possibly on drinking behavior (631). After substantial blood loss in the rat, ANG II levels were increased in the hypothalamus independently of the increases in plasma ANG II, which could mean a role for brain ANG II in drinking and blood pressure control in hypovolemia (451). Regional increases in ANG II binding also occur in response to dehydration or sodium restriction (382), supporting the view that the brain system is responsive to changing physiological need. Dehydration leads to increased ANG II receptor binding in the SFO. In sodium restriction, the increase was small but significant and confined to the PVN, suggesting that there is a limited subset of receptors responding to sodium deprivation (684).

Whether angiotensin peptides derived from brain precursors are to be regarded simply as neurotransmitters or as also exercising a paracrine role is undecided. In view of the discrepancy in concentrations between renin and angiotensin peptides in brain tissue, renin is probably not an obligatory component of the processes that lead to the formation of angiotensin peptides. The anatomic distribution of components also may not match that of receptors. Because renin activity and angiotensin immunoreactivity and binding in the brain are so widespread and because they are present in regions as unexpected as the cerebellum, it is more than probable that some of the actions of centrally generated angiotensin peptides have little to do with body fluid homeostasis. The physiological consistency of the peripheral actions of ANG II is unlikely to be repeated for centrally generated ANG II, although most experimental evidence supports the view that brain ANG II is particularly important in the regulation of blood pressure, sodium homeostasis, and blood volume (342). These are related physiological functions that have a direct bearing on thirst and sodium appetite. Drinking behavior is affected by changes in blood pressure, decreases causing hypovolemic thirst and sodium appetite in which ANG II is implicated, and acute increases attenuating ANG II-induced thirst (see sect. III, A2 and B2) and probably sodium appetite.

The SH rat provides much of the evidence for involvement of a brain renin-angiotensin system in blood pressure control, and it has been suggested that an overactive brain renin-angiotensin system in this rat strain is responsible for the hypertension (77, 78, 674) and increased sodium appetite, although whether this means overproduction of angiotensin peptides or heightened sensitivity to their action or both of these is not always clear. Certainly, injection of ANG II into the lateral ventricle caused larger pressor responses in SH rats than in WK controls (267), and septal neurons in stroke-prone SH rats were more sensitive to iontophoretically applied ANG II, showing a lower threshold and extended afterdischarge compared with WK rats (158, 159). Furthermore, plasma renin and ANG II are not elevated in SH rats, whereas renin activity is elevated in brain catecholaminergic nuclei and ANG II levels are increased in the hypothalamus, NTS, and dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus in SH rats compared with WK rats (674). The central pressor actions of ANG II and the increased responsiveness of SH rats have been regarded as favoring a role for ANG II generated from brain precursors in the control of blood pressure, especially since some of the sensitive structures lie inside the blood-brain barrier. Pressor sites accessible to blood-borne or locally generated ANG II have been identified in various parts of the brain, including the MnPO nucleus, OVLT, SFO, central gray, superior colliculus, AP, and NTS.

Direct evidence suggesting participation of brain ANG II in the control of blood pressure is provided by experiments with antagonists of the renin-angiotensin system that necessarily can only produce their effects by preventing the endogenous formation or action of ANG II. In SH rats, intracerebroventricular administration of ANG II receptor antagonists (357, 372, 452) or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (277, 581) lowered the blood pressure independently of an effect on circulating ANG II. In SH rats, there was a dose-dependent reduction in blood pressure after acute blockade of brain angiotensin receptors by lateral ventricular saralasin, whereas intravenous infusion of saralasin caused a rise in blood pressure (357). The hypotensive effect of intracerebroventricular saralasin was still present 15-20 h after nephrectomy. These effects were not seen in WK controls. However, others found no lowering of blood pressure in SH rats after intracerebroventricular administration of saralasin or sarthran (37, 68), and injection of losartan into the lateral ventricle did not lower the blood pressure of SH rats, whereas oral administration was extremely effective (126). Intracerebroventricular losartan also prevented the pressor response to intracerebroventricular injection of ANG II but not to intravenous ANG II (see sect. VB3). According to these results, the antihypertensive effect of losartan seemed to be exerted outside the blood-brain barrier, which if confirmed would leave unresolved the question of the role of brain ANG II in the elevated blood pressure of SH rats.

Despite the conflicting reports, more recent evidence with intracerebroventricular injection of losartan or antisense oligonucleotides supports the view that ANG II formed locally in the brain is responsible for the high blood pressure in SH rats and that circulating ANG II plays little part in this type of hypertension. Single injections of losartan into the lateral ventricle caused a slowly developing reduction in blood pressure in SH but not WK rats (437). Antisense inhibition of either AT1 receptor mRNA or angiotensinogen mRNA reduced the blood pressure of SH rats to normotensive levels, but neither of these antisense oligonucleotides affected the blood pressure of normotensive WK controls (250). These results suggest that ANG II formed locally in the brain is responsible for the elevated blood pressure of SH rats. However, they also seem to suggest that ANG II plays no part in the control of blood pressure in normotensive animals. The latter conclusion is surprising. The differences between SH and WK rats seem more likely to be quantitative than representing fundamental differences in the central mechanisms of blood pressure control.

The possible role of ANG II formed in the brain has also been examined in other models of hypertension, with findings that are not always consistent. Intravenous saralasin lowered the blood pressure in the rat with two-kidney, one-clip Goldblatt hypertension (see sect. XF), showing the importance of circulating ANG II for maintaining the elevated blood pressure (357) as it is for the accompanying increased drinking behavior. However, intracerebroventricular saralasin or captopril (357, 581) also lowered the blood pressure in doses that were ineffective when given peripherally. This does not necessarily mean that ANG II formed in the brain is responsible for the rise in blood pressure in renal hypertension because these treatments also caused a fall in plasma renin by unknown mechanisms so that the results are compatible with an exclusive role for circulating ANG II. In rats with DOCA-salt hypertension, intravenous and intracerebroventricular saralasin or capto pril were pressor. The agonism and lack of any hypotensive effect of saralasin does not suggest involvement of renal or brain renin in the increased blood pressure of this animal preparation. However, results with captopril in DOCA-salt hypertension make it unwise to eliminate altered activity of brain renin-angiotensin altogether as a factor in DOCA-salt hypertension; a single intracerebroventricular injection of captopril was pressor (581), but long-term infusion over 7 days attenuated the increase in blood pressure (283). On the other hand, there is little doubt that central mineralocorticoid effects are important in this model because intracerebroventricular infusion of RU-28318, a specific mineralocorticoid antagonist, prevented the hypertension caused by mineralocorticoid excess (235). Again, as suggested for SH and WK rats, a fall in blood pressure produced by presumed blockade of a brain renin-angiotensin system in these models of hypertension might simply be the result of eliminating a basal control mechanism. It does not mean that the increased blood pressure in renal or DOCA-salt hypertension is accounted for by overactivity of the brain system.

C. Role in Drinking

Angiotensin peptides generated in the brain could account for the increased spontaneous sodium appetite in some hypertensive strains of rat and for the increased responsiveness of these animals to dipsogenic and natriorexigenic challenges. There is also evidence of involvement in the increased sodium appetite produced by sodium depletion in normotensive rats and after adrenalectomy. However, the ways in which brain angiotensin peptides could be involved in the control of drinking behavior in these or other circumstances pose many questions to which few answers can be given at present. Angiotensin II and other angiotensin peptides influencing drinking behavior may be generated from precursors reaching the brain from the periphery as well as those formed in brain itself.

1. Water intake

Renin and the peptide precursors of ANG II are effective intracranial dipsogens in rat, dog, and pigeon (see sect. VC). The discovery of components of a renin-angiotensin system in brain provided a possible interpretation of these results. It seemed likely that, as in the periphery, precursors of ANG II injected by the intracranial route caused increased drinking through local generation of ANG II brought about by components of the brain renin-angiotensin system, i.e., angiotensin-sensitive dipsogenic receptors bind and are stimulated by ANG II and structurally similar analogs. Evidence in support of this was obtained by injecting appropriate blockers of the renin-angiotensin cascade through the same intracranial cannula some minutes before the presumed agonist. In the rat, inhibition of the reaction between renin and angiotensinogen with intracranial pepstatin, an N-acylated pentapeptide which is a specific acid protease inhibitor, resulted in reduced water intake in response to intracranial injection of renin but not ANG I or ANG II (
189). In the rat (189) and pigeon (153), drinking in response to intracranial injections of renin, TDP renin substrate, or ANG I was attenuated by injection of the ACE inhibitors teprotide or captopril, whereas ANG II-induced water intake and intracranial carbachol-induced drinking (see sect. VIIIA), which can be elicited in rat but not dog or pigeon, were unaffected by ACE inhibition. There has been some disagreement about the effects of ACE inhibition on ANG I-induced drinking. Some (70, 79, 584) found no inhibition after teprotide and suggested that the decapeptide may be independently dipsogenic, but others using larger antagonist-to-agonist molar ratios of teprotide (528) or captopril (156, 626) have confirmed that ANG I-induced drinking is almost completely blocked when sufficient ACE inhibitor is used. Alternative processing pathways (see Fig. 1) not blocked by ACE inhibitors leading to the formation of other dipsogenically active angiotensin peptides could account for small residual intakes in ACE-blockaded animals after renin, TDP substrate, or ANG I.

The dog's natural renin substrate was much less effective as an intracranial dipsogen in dog than synthetic TDP renin substrate (194, 465); this was also true for the rat's natural renin substrate in the rat (189, 538). The poor responses to the natural substrates may reflect the low levels of brain renin present near dipsogenic sites, because natural substrate requires brain renin to form ANG II. On the other hand, ANG II can be formed from TDP renin substrate by other enzymes without the intervention of renin. Few of these enzymes are able to cleave natural substrate (86). This could explain why in dogs, drinking induced by TDP renin substrate was blocked by teprotide but not by N-acetyl pepstatin (465). Similarly in the rat, TDP renin substrate-induced drinking was attenuated much less by pepstatin than by teprotide (189), or was entirely unaffected (538). Tetradecapeptide renin substrate cannot therefore be used in experiments designed to test the presence of extrarenal renin because alternative pathways of ANG II formation from TDP renin substrate exist.

Although the presence of components of a renin-angiotensin system in brain tissue explains how the dipsogenic effects of intracranial injection of renin or ANG II precursors are mediated, these results do not shed light on whether ANG II generated from peptide precursors formed in situ in the brain participates in the control of water intake under normal or abnormal circumstances. As discussed in section IIIA3, some hypertensive strains of rat drink more water in response to ANG II and other thirst challenges. But because supposedly non-ANG II-dependent dipsogenic challenges are also more effective in hypertensive rats, this may simply mean a general increase in responsiveness of all thirst mechanisms. It does not necessarily implicate a brain renin-angiotensin system in the increased responsiveness, although it does not rule it out. It is entirely possible that central angiotensinergic mechanisms are involved in all types of drinking behavior, not just those generally regarded as being angiotensin dependent. For example, a possible role for brain angiotensin has been proposed for thirst caused by increases in extracellular sodium concentration in brain (44). In these experiments on cows (48), sheep (655), rabbits, rats, and mice, it was found that the thirst aroused by intracerebroventricular infusion of hypertonic NaCl in CSF was reduced by intracerebroventricular infusion of losartan. The AT2 antagonist PD-123319 had no effect on thirst, and neither AT1 nor AT2 antagonists affected the sodium intake of sodium-depleted animals. Food intake was unaffected by losartan, indicating that the inhibitory action of losartan was directed to brain areas regulating water intake. Because thirst aroused by cellular dehydration depends both on osmoreceptors outside the blood-brain barrier and, in some species although perhaps not in rat, on sodium sensors in the brain that respond to CSF sodium concentration (373), these results may mean that cellular dehydration thirst depends, at least in part, on central ANG II. In the goat, the simultaneous infusion of ANG II and hypertonic NaCl into the third ventricle resulted in a marked potentiation of the dipsogenic and antidiuretic effects (10, 11). Central ANG II may also participate in food-associated drinking in sheep because intracerebroventricular infusion of losartan inhibited the postprandial increase in water intake without affecting food intake, whereas intravenous losartan did not have this effect (369). Angiotensin II may be responsible for the genetic polydipsia of the STR/N strain of mice because subcutaneous captopril or saralasin injected into the lateral ventricle reduced drinking in the polydipsic strain only (299). Plasma renin levels were normal in STR/N mice, but the number of ANG II-sensitive neurons was significantly lower in the AV3V region of these animals than in controls, perhaps owing to increased ANG II generation in brain causing downregulation of receptors in central structures. This could indicate that ANG II formed in brain rather than in the periphery was responsible for the polydipsia.

2. Sodium intake

Renin and the peptide precursors of ANG II arouse sodium appetite as well as thirst. Renin-induced intakes of water and NaCl were diminished by a preliminary injection or infusion of captopril, teprotide, or saralasin through the same intracranial cannula, showing that the effects were mediated through the action of locally available components of the brain renin-angiotensin system (
21). As is the case for water intake induced by renin and ANG II precursors, the results are compatible with but do not prove a natriorexigenic role for ANG II generated from peptide precursors synthesized in the brain. On the other hand, in rat, theories which base the arousal of sodium appetite exclusively on the action of circulating ANG II do not seem to be supported by the fact that systemic injections of renin or ANG II, or stimulating renal renin release pharmacologically with isoproterenol (see sect. IXA), or stimulating it surgically by restricting renal blood flow (see sect. XF) or by ligating the ureters (see sect. XH), cause increases in water intake but no changes in NaCl intake in the first few hours. However, it should be emphasized that in other animal species and in rat in the longer term and when pressor responses are moderated, increases in circulating ANG II can stimulate or restore NaCl intake (see sect. IV).

Whether ANG II derived from brain precursors participates in naturally aroused sodium appetite has been examined by blocking ANG II formation or receptors in the central nervous system with appropriate renin-angiotensin antagonists. Evidence that ANG II formed locally in the brain (but not necessarily from precursors formed in brain) may be the stimulus to increased sodium appetite is provided by experiments with systemically administered ACE inhibitors including captopril. These results are discussed in detail in section IXC2. In some experiments, it is clear that increased circulating ANG I is the source of increased ANG II formed in the brain. However, the finding that the elevated NaCl intake in adrenalectomized rats was only inhibited when captopril was given in sufficiently high peripheral dosage to prevent both the central and the peripheral conversion of ANG I to ANG II is also compatible with angiotensin precursors formed in brain tissue, itself being the source of the ANG I.

Alterations in brain ANG II production or increased sensitivity to its action may be responsible for the enhanced baseline preference for NaCl solutions shown by SH rats compared with WK controls, which is maintained independently of blood pressure (129). As we have seen (sect. VIIB), renin is not elevated in the plasma of SH rats, but it is in brain catecholaminergic nuclei compared with WK rats (674). Prevention of local ANG II formation by infusion of captopril (80 µg/h) into the lateral cerebral ventricle caused a reduction in the high spontaneous NaCl intake of SH rats, whereas the NaCl intake of WK rats was unaffected by captopril (128). An infusion rate of 8 µg/h into the lateral ventricle produced no change in blood pressure but caused a significant reduction in NaCl intake. The selective attenuation of the increased spontaneous NaCl intake in SH rats suggests that central ANG II may contribute to the increased appetite, independently of any contribution that it makes to hypertension (see sect.VIIB), but whether through overproduction of angiotensin peptides or increased responsiveness to their actions or both of these is undecided. However, the responses to most dipsogenic and natriorexigenic challenges are greater in SH rats than those in WK rats (see sect. IIIA3), i.e., the heightened responsiveness to stimuli applies to both water intake and NaCl intake, and it is not restricted to ANG II-dependent drinking challenges. Therefore, it does not necessarily implicate an overactive brain renin-angiotensin system, although neither of course does it exclude it. Because plasma prolactin levels are elevated in SH rats, this is another factor that could contribute to the exaggerated sodium preference and increased responsiveness to dipsogenic and natriorexigenic stimuli (see sects. IIIA4 and IVA3), and there may be others.

In other, normotensive, rat strains, it has been claimed that the ANG II contribution to the expression of sodium appetite depends on ANG II formed from renin-angiotensin precursors synthesized in the central nervous system and not on circulating hormone. This view is partly based on the finding that intracerebroventricular injection of saralasin or sarile or infusion of captopril into normotensive rats inhibited the sodium appetite aroused by furosemide-induced sodium depletion (see sect. IXB) without affecting sodium excretion or spontaneous overnight food and water intakes (660). These results are consistent with the captopril results on the spontaneous NaCl intake in SH rats just mentioned. Furthermore, furosemide-induced sodium appetite was reduced in a dose-dependent fashion by angiotensin blockade by intracerebroventricular sarile but not by intravenous sarile, although the latter was fully effective against thirst elicited by intravenous ANG II (507), suggesting that ANG II of cerebral origin, not renal, is responsible for the expression of sodium appetite.

The increased appetite aroused by furosemide-induced sodium depletion was also reduced although not suppressed by blockade of the central mineralocorticoid receptors with RU-28318, a specific mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (513). Blockade of the peripheral mineralocorticoid receptors did not have this effect. It was only when central mineralocorticoid blockade was combined with blockade of ANG II formation by large systemic dosage of captopril, which prevents central ANG II formation (see above and sect. IXC2), that the appetite was completely suppressed, a result that supports the idea that ANG II and aldosterone normally each contributes to the increased sodium appetite of sodium depletion. There is obviously no mineralocorticoid contribution to the sodium appetite of adrenalectomy, but central ANG II action appears to be vital and, according to the authors, ANG II of cerebral origin; the robust sodium appetite of the adrenalectomized rat was completely suppressed in dose-related fashion by intracerebroventricular sarile but not by intravenous sarile (508). Injection of the AT1 antagonist losartan into the third cerebral ventricle also inhibited adrenalectomy-induced NaCl intake, whereas the AT2 antagonist PD-123319 was ineffective (226). The experiments with losartan and PD-123319 do not throw any further light on whether ANG II of cerebral or peripheral origin is mainly responsible for adrenalectomy-induced sodium appetite. They do raise the interesting suggestion that AT2 receptors may have a permissive role in sodium appetite of adrenalectomy because when doses of losartan that were ineffective by themselves were combined with PD-123319, NaCl intake was inhibited.

However, the conclusion that sodium appetite depends exclusively on ANG II of cerebral origin can be challenged on several grounds. First, it has been claimed that the intravenous dose of captopril used (2.5 mg/h) by Epstein and colleagues (507) in sodium-depleted normal rats was insufficient to block cerebral conversion of the increased amounts of ANG I reaching the brain (616). Second, the narrow range of intravenous dosage of sarile used (498 and 600 µg/h) did cause some inhibition (616). Had higher doses been employed, the inhibition might have reached statistical significance, although, of course, it is also possible that the agonistic effect of large amounts of sarile would have obscured the angiotensin antagonism. A third ground for caution is that there is evidence that circulating ANG II can arouse sodium appetite in sheep, cows, and even in rabbits (see sect. IVC). Mineralocorticoid-induced sodium appetite is much weaker in sheep and rabbits than in rats (122) so that it could be argued that in these species circulating ANG II is likely to be a more significant peripheral natriorexigenic factor acting directly on brain than mineralocorticoids. It seems highly unlikely that differences between rat and other mammals would be anything other than quantitative. Fourth, the suppression of sodium appetite by peripheral ACE inhibition can be reversed in sheep, cows, rats and mice, and rabbits by systemic administration of ANG II (see sect. IXC).

D. Comment

In hypovolemia, altered sensory information from the underfilled circulation produces its own effects on drinking behavior independently of circulating ANG II, these effects being reinforced by the accompanying increases in circulating ANG II. It is also likely that the peripheral signals interact with the effects of angiotensin peptides generated in the brain in response to the hypovolemic stimulus and that these peptides have a particular role to play in hypovolemic sodium appetite. However, the circumstances in which angiotensin peptides formed locally in brain from brain precursors affect drinking behavior are not well understood. Circulating ANG II generated by renal renin has well-defined physiological functions, acting on many tissues and participating in practically every aspect of the regulation of blood volume and blood pressure, including the control of water intake and probably NaCl intake. However, in brain, it is difficult to envisage such a circumscribed role because ANG II immunoreactivity and binding are so widely distributed. Whatever the part played by angiotensin peptides generated from brain precursors in regulating drinking behavior, they are also involved in cardiovascular regulation, and it is just as likely that they are also involved in functions that have little to do with body fluid homeostasis and blood pressure control, such as learning and memory or the release of certain pituitary hormones.

Angiotensin peptides of central origin may contribute to increased thirst caused by both cellular and extracellular dehydration, and to the increased sodium appetite of adrenalectomized and sodium-depleted rats and of SH rats and perhaps other models of increased sodium appetite. They may also contribute to the increase in blood pressure in some types of hypertension. It is not often stated whether overproduction of angiotensin peptides or heightened sensitivity to their action is mainly responsible for any changes produced. What evidence there is suggests that both may play a part and that the brain renin-angiotensin system is functionally responsive to altered physiological demands. If angiotensin peptides generated from central nervous precursors are indeed responsible for the increases in sodium appetite and blood pressure in some types of hypertension, the question whether they are involved in the control of drinking behavior and blood pressure in nonpathological circumstances is unresolved. Because there are angiotensinergic fiber pathways inside the blood-brain barrier, it is difficult to imagine that angiotensin peptides would not also have a role in drinking behavior in normal animals, although evidence in WK rats is regarded by some as discounting this possibility. However, if the brain system is important in hypertension, it seems inescapable that it also plays a role in normal blood pressure control and body fluid homeostasis. The differences between normotensive and hypertensive animals are more likely a question of degree than representing fundamental differences in controlling mechanisms.

Because of the widespread distribution and diverse functions of ANG II-sensitive neurons in brain, centrally released ANG II may act as a neurotransmitter with the specificity of function depending exclusively on anatomic connections between neurons. There are also regions of the brain where components of a conventional renin-angiotensin system are missing or where production of ANG II seems to take place at a distance from its receptors. Anatomic separation of this kind would also suggest a volume or paracrine role for ANG II. Networks of chemically addressed and diffusely organized neurons concerned in certain aspects of the control of drinking behavior and cardiovascular function, which are reached and stimulated by neuroactive substances reaching them by diffusion, could modify the functions of the more precisely linked networks of neurons that employ classical anatomically addressed transmitters. This would fit in with the robustness of the drinking response caused by intracranial administration of ANG II, the ease with which drinking can be elicited in a huge range of animal species, the small amount of peptide needed, and absence of side effects even after very large doses. To produce such normal behavior by simply flooding a large region of the brain with ANG II is remarkable. It seems to indicate that this is a replication of what happens normally and argues in favor of an important paracrine component.

 
View this table:
[in this window] [in a new window]
 
TABLE 5.   Effects on drinking behavior of certain neuroactive substances (excluding angiotensin peptides) thought to be released by neurons and implicated in ANG II-induced drinking

Central nervous processing may also involve the production of biologically active angiotensin peptides other than ANG II. For some of these there are high-affinity binding sites (e.g., AT2 and AT4) in the brain. This could mean that specificity of function is also determined by which angiotensin ligands and receptors are involved. Little is known about the effects of the different angiotensin peptides on drinking behavior or the effects of activating the different receptors, but the potential consequences of this diversity are the possibility of opposing effects on thirst and sodium appetite (see sect. VB3), or of long-term modifications based on experience and learning, in addition to the well-established and immediate stimulatory effects caused by ANG II stimulation of AT1 receptors. It is reasonable to envisage paracrine roles for some of these ligands inside the blood-brain barrier, restricted to certain aspects of body fluid homeostasis and cardiovascular control. These functions are not necessarily all the same as those elicited by circulating angiotensin peptides. A corollary of nonoverlap of angiotensin-induced actions on the two sides of the blood-brain barrier would be that an important role of the CVOs is to restrict the action of blood-borne angiotensin peptides to the appropriate sensitive neurons located outside the blood-brain barrier, leaving those inside the barrier to be acted upon by angiotensin peptides generated in situ in the brain.

    VIII. NEUROTRANSMITTERS AND ANGIOTENSIN-INDUCED DRINKING
Top
Previous
Next
References

Many substances that are thought to be released by neurons, and possibly in some cases by neuroglial cells as well, affect drinking behavior when injected into the brain and may interact with and modify ANG II-induced drinking. These substances act as neurotransmitters producing effects localized to the postsynaptic membrane or presynaptic endings close to where they are released, or they may diffuse into the extracellular fluid and exert paracrine or volume effects on nervous structures some distance from their source, or they are secreted into the bloodstream and function as hormones. The time course of action varies, and some substances could have long-term trophic actions. The nature of the interaction between angiotensin peptides derived from whatever source and these other substances is generally unknown. Where it has been established that ANG II is colocalized in particular neurons with other peptides or neurotransmitters, the substances could be coreleased in response to the same event and could act presynaptically or postsynaptically at the same synapses so that interaction takes place within an angiotensinergic system itself. There are other possibilities, and interaction may be more remote, with different neuronal pathways employing different neurotransmitters and subserving different aspects of drinking behavior, operating separately and only converging to produce an integrated response at some final common pathway.

Considered in this section are neuroactive substances (except angiotensin peptides themselves) released in the nervous system that are known to stimulate or inhibit drinking behavior when injected into parts of the brain (Table 5). Most of these have been shown to interact with ANG II-induced thirst or sodium appetite. They include classical neurotransmitters, peptides, and other substances such as PGs and nitric oxide. Thirst and sodium appetite are also affected by neuroactive substances released outside the central nervous system, and many of these also interact with ANG II-induced drinking. These are dealt with elsewhere: corticosteroids in section IIC, reproductive hormones (except oxytocin) in sections IIIA4 and IVA3, and increases in circulating ANG II caused by drugs or experimental procedures in sections IX and X. Complete lists of substances causing increased thirst or sodium appetite appear in Table 6.

 
View this table:
[in this window] [in a new window]
 
TABLE 6.   Substances that cause increased intakes of water and sodium solutions when given by intracranial or systemic injection or infusion

Some substances stimulate drinking behavior by participating directly in central mechanisms. Others inhibit it, sometimes quite selectively. Substances may have opposite effects in different animal species (e.g., tachykinins stimulate drinking in birds but inhibit it in mammals), or even in the same species (e.g., opioids may both stimulate and inhibit drinking behavior). The actions of a substance released in the brain may complement the effects of the same substance when it is released peripherally and is acting as a circulating hormone, although in some cases the effects may be quite the opposite (e.g., serotonin acting centrally may sometimes inhibit drinking but acting peripherally it stimulates).

A. Acetylcholine

Acetylcholine is distributed throughout the central nervous system, occurring in all parts of the forebrain, midbrain, and brain stem. Cholinergic stimulation of limbic structures by intracranial injection of acetylcholine or carbachol causes vigorous drinking in the rat, but not in the cat, monkey, and pigeon, and very little in the dog and rabbit (244-246). Cholinergic stimulation inhibits sodium appetite in the rat (192). The rat's SFO, which is especially sensitive to the dipsogenic action of circulating ANG II, responds to carbachol (494), but ANG II-induced drinking does not seem to depend on cholinergic pathways. Intracranial or subcutaneous injection of doses of atropine that were fully effective at preventing carbachol-induced drinking did not block ANG II-induced drinking (199). Angiotensin II-induced drinking was only inhibited by doses of atropine large enough to produce signs of general atropinization. Angiotensin II-induced drinking was also unaffected by injection of atropine into the lateral ventricle of the cat which does not drink to carbachol (102). This and other evidence suggest that in the rat and cat ANG II-induced drinking does not depend on cholinergic mechanisms that seem to be more involved in thirst of cellular origin than in hypovolemic thirst (184). However, there are species differences because intracerebroventricular atropine blocked ANG II-induced drinking in the dog which shows a small and variable increase in drinking in response to carbachol (463).

On the other hand, it has been suggested that ANG II may be involved in cholinergic thirst because intracerebroventricular injection of large doses of the AT2 antagonist PD-123319 inhibited carbachol-induced drinking in the rat (219, 501). Drinking in response to other thirst challenges was also inhibited by PD-123319, but eating behavior was not, giving rise to the suggestion that there is a final common AT2 pathway for all types of thirst including cholinergic as discussed in section VB. However, intracerebroventricular carbachol-induced drinking was not inhibited and may even have been slightly increased by pretreatment with the nonselective angiotensin antagonist [Sar1,Gly8]ANG II (189), and it was unaffected by the AT2 antagonists CGP-42112 (38) and PD-123177 (103), the AT1 antagonist losartan (38, 306), and AT1 antisense oligonucleotide (see sect. VB4) (510). The significance of the inhibitory effect of PD-123319 on carbachol-induced drinking is not obvious.

B. Catecholamines

The peripheral action of beta -adrenergics on drinking behavior is dealt with in section IXA. There are many monoaminergic pathways that project widely from the brain stem to the forebrain structures that are responsible for the control of drinking behavior and body fluid homeostasis. Dopamine is the major mammalian catecholamine in the central nervous system. In addition to the nigrostriatal system, dopaminergic neurons form a mesolimbic system with fibers arising in the ventral tegmentum and projecting to the hypothalamus and various parts of the limbic system. Noradrenergic neurons from locus ceruleus, NTS, dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus, and other nuclei in the pons and medulla send ascending fibers running in dorsal and ventral noradrenergic bundles and then the medial forebrain bundle to many parts of the forebrain, including the hypothalamus, amygdala, thalamus, cerebral cortex, and hippocampus. Other noradrenergic fibers supply the cerebellum and spinal cord. Adrenergic fibers are much more restricted in their distribution, projecting from brain stem to hypothalamus and spinal cord. The dipsogenic action of intracranial ANG II may involve interaction with the catecholamines that are released from neurons by ANG II and that are known to elicit ingestive behavior when injected into the brain of the rat (244). The neurogenic pressor response to close arterial infusion of ANG II is an example of central nervous angiotensin/adrenergic interaction. In the rat, ANG II-induced drinking depends on the integrity of catecholaminergic pathways. There is a close parallelism between the amounts of brain angiotensin (see sect. VII) and norepinephrine in various parts of the brain of dog and rats (171, 342), and intracerebroventricular injection of ANG II has been shown by microdialysis to release norepinephrine from the anterior hypothalamus of the conscious rat (460).

Angiotension II could interact with both afferent and efferent central autonomic pathways. A matrix of ANG II-immunoreactive fibers and varicosities enclose catecholamine-containing cells in the ventrolateral medulla. Angiotensin II-immunoreactive fibers also innervate dopamine-containing neurons throughout the hypothalamic periventricular zone. Ascending noradrenergic pathways from cell groups in the brain stem reach the MnPO nucleus, a well-defined focus of angiotensinergic and adrenergic innervation. Angiotensin II and catecholamines are therefore present together in structures associated with the control of blood pressure and body fluid homeostasis so that in hypovolemia, ANG II could influence the responses to the sensory information reaching the ventral lamina terminalis from volume receptors and baroreceptors via ascending noradrenergic and other pathways. Electrophysiological evidence shows that there is increased activity in the ascending noradrenergic pathways projecting to the MnPO nucleus in hypovolemia or hypotension, which could provide the mechanism for integration of neural inputs from volume receptors and baroreceptors and ANG II effects in the ventral lamina terminalis (289).

Injection of 6-hydroxydopamine into the lateral ventricle, which selectively destroys catecholaminergic neurons, attenuated drinking in response to intracerebroventricular ANG II but not carbachol (199). When in the intact rat injection of ANG II or carbachol was preceded by injection of catecholamine antagonists through the same intracranial cannula, the dopamine antagonists haloperidol and spiroperidol inhibited ANG II-induced drinking but not carbachol-induced drinking. High intracranial doses of alpha - and beta -adrenergic receptor antagonists also inhibited drinking, but the alpha -antagonist phentolamine was no more effective against ANG II than it was against carbachol, and the beta -antagonists propranolol and sotalol were also without differential inhibitory effects on the two dipsogens. High doses of D- and L-propranolol were equally inhibitory, although only the D-isomer is a receptor blocker. In the cat, alpha - and beta -adrenergic neurons seem to be involved, since both intracerebroventricular phentolamine and D-propranolol inhibited ANG II-induced drinking (102). Other results in rat using various blockers implicate adrenergic and dopaminergic pathways in ANG II-induced drinking. Some evidence is contradictory, but this may depend on which brain structures are affected and whether intake of water or NaCl is in question. For example, intracranial injection of norepinephrine has been found to inhibit thirst (246) but stimulate sodium appetite (97). However, in another study, injection of norepinephrine, clonidine, the presynaptic alpha 2-adrenergic agonist, or phenylephrine into the third ventricle inhibited intakes of 3% NaCl and water caused by intracerebroventricular renin or subcutaneous DOCA (127). The results in this experiment suggested that alpha 2-adrenergic receptors were responsible for the inhibition of hormone (ANG II, aldosterone)-induced NaCl intake, but the presence of norepinephrine in the ventral lamina terminalis seems critical for ANG II-induced drinking. Impairment after 6-hydroxydopamine (34) can be reversed by central norepinephrine infusions or transplants of fetal noradrenergic cells in this region (110, 289). Norepinephrine is a widespread neurotransmitter, and it is not unreasonable to assume that it may have both excitatory and inhibitory effects on fluid intake.

C. Serotonin

Serotonergic pathways from midline raphé neurons of the brain stem project to parts of the limbic system, hypothalamus, hippocampus, and cortex. There are similarities in distribution between serotonergic and noradrenergic pathways, and the close parallelism between brain angiotensin and norepinephrine in various parts of the brain has already been mentioned. Angiotensin II-immunoreactive nerve terminals are found in serotonin-positive regions in the hypothalamus and brain stem. Angiotensin II stimulates serotonin synthesis and release from nervous tissue (78), introducing the possibility that central serotonergic mechanisms play a role in the ANG II drinking response. Systemically injected serotonin causes increased drinking in rat, an effect that is probably brought about by activation of the renal renin-angiotensin system (see sect. IXE), but evidence of a direct excitatory effect of centrally injected serotonin on drinking behavior is much weaker than it is for systemic injection. In rhesus monkey, serotonin (6-25 µg) caused eating and drinking on 27 of 55 occasions when injected in the fiber systems associated with the fields of Forel (530). The response latency was long (15-30 min), but some animals drank without eating. The central dipsogenic effect is clearly very weak, and there is little evidence of it in the rat; depleting central serotonin stores pharmacologically had no effect on the pressor or dipsogenic effects of intracerebroventricular ANG II (84). Serotonin effects on brain are widespread and complex, affecting wakefulness, mood, aggression, feeding, sexual behavior, motor neuron excitability, body temperature, anterior pituitary secretion, and autonomic functions in the gut, heart, and circulation. Some of these other actions of serotonin could have secondary effects on drinking behavior.

Even though there may be a weak drinking response to intracranial serotonin, activating central serotonergic pathways on drinking can also be inhibitory. Water and 0.3 M NaCl intakes induced by injection of ANG II (50 ng) into the lateral ventricle of the rat or by subcutaneous injections of furosemide and captopril were inhibited by serotonergic agonists and augmented by the serotonergic receptor antagonist methysergide (4 µg/200 nl), injected bilaterally 10 min beforehand into the LPBN (380, 381). Bilateral injections of methysergide into the LPBN also enhanced NaCl intake in response to injections of ANG II (20 ng/200 nl) into the SFO, an effect that was blocked by preinjection of losartan (1 µg/200 nl) into the SFO (100). Systemic dexfenfluramine, a drug enhancing serotonergic transmission, inhibited spontaneous and depletion-induced NaCl intake without affecting water intake, whereas the serotonin antagonist metergoline caused significant increases, suggesting that serotonin may have a tonic inhibitory role on NaCl intake (493). These results indicate that there is a serotonergic inhibitory pathway associated with the LPBN. It is reasonable to suppose that this forms part of the ascending brain stem pathway for volume control referred to in section VIG, but such a mechanism is not incompatible with the presence in the periphery and possibly in other parts of the brain of serotonergic mechanisms that stimulate drinking.

D. Excitatory and Inhibitory Amino Acids

Glutamate, the major excitatory neurotransmitter, and GABA, the inhibitory transmitter synthesized from glutamate, are present in high concentrations in neurons in many brain areas where they function in projections between areas, raising or lowering the level of neural activity. Among excitatory amino acid receptors, the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) subtype predominates in the hippocampus and hypothalamus. Two excitatory amino acids, NMDA and kainate (a stable analog of L-glutamate), have been found to be dipsogenic in pigeons (31), but glutamate itself does not appear to be (152). The relation of excitatory amino acids to ANG II-induced drinking in pigeon is unknown. The possible role of excitatory amino acids in drinking behavior in the mammal is also not known, but NMDA receptors may mediate drinking and c-fos expression in response to intracerebroventricular ANG II. Intracerebroventricular infusion of dizocilpine, which prevents calcium entry through open NMDA channels, inhibits ANG II-induced drinking and c-fos expression in the MnPO nucleus, SON, PVN, and NTS (683). This suggests that an NMDA receptor-dependent mechanism is involved in both the behavioral and cellular responses to ANG II. gamma -Aminobutyric acid attenuates intracerebroventricular ANG II-induced intakes of water and NaCl (3, 294) and ANG II-induced pressor responses and vasopressin release (58, 59).

E. Tachykinins and Bombesin-Like Peptides

Tachykinins and bombesin-like peptides are unrelated biologically active peptides with similar effects on drinking behavior so that it is convenient to consider them together. Both affect ANG II-induced drinking behavior in rats. Tachykinins are involved in body fluid homeostasis, in a variety of motor, sensory, and autonomic functions, and they have potent and specific effects on drinking behavior in mammals and birds (113, 118). Tachykinins share a common COOH-terminal sequence, and they include substance P found in mammalian brain, gut, and skin, physalaemin from the skin of the South American frog, kassinin from the skin of the African frog, and eledoisin from the Mediterranean octopus. They and their receptors are widely distributed in the central nervous system, but there is not always good correspondence between tachykinin nerve fibers and tachykinin receptor density, possibly because of the presence of low-affinity binding sites or undiscovered receptor subtypes (433). Among the tachykinins isolated from mammalian brain and the preferred receptors on which they act are the undecapeptide substance P (NK-1 receptor), the decapeptides neurokinin A (NK-2 receptor) and neurokinin B (NK-3 receptor), and the NH2-terminal extended peptides neuropeptide K and neuropeptide gamma  (NK-2 receptor) (259). The NK-1 receptor is found in brain and peripheral tissue, NK-2 in highest concentration in the periphery, and NK-3 mainly in brain. Receptors are the seven membrane spanning type coupled to G protein. Mammalian tachykinins are rapidly hydrolyzed by ACE and other peptidases, but the nonmammalian tachykinins are more resistant to degradation, and because they bind to mammalian cerebral receptors, they are more potent and have longer lasting effects when injected into the mammalian brain. Members of a second group of neuroactive peptides from amphibian skin, the bombesin-like peptides, also affect drinking behavior in mammals and birds. They include bombesin, ranatensin, and litorin. The mammalian analog of bombesin is gastrin-releasing peptide. Bombesin receptors have been identified in the pancreas and central nervous system.

Tachykinins and bombesin-like peptides injected into sensitive structures in the brain are generally dipsogenic in pigeons but antidipsogenic in rats (113, 154, 191). In thirsty sodium-depleted wild rabbits and sheep, eledoisin infused into the lateral ventricle caused increased water intake in addition to inhibiting sodium intake (596) so that the difference in the effects of tachykinins on drinking in pigeon and rat is not a distinction between birds and mammals but probably represents differences in the distribution of receptors and receptor types. In the pigeon, injection of eledoisin, physalaemin, or bombesin into the third cerebral ventricle caused vigorous short-latency dose-dependent drinking, similar to the ANG II response, but requiring ~10 times the molar dose for the same water intake, and generally unaffected by prior treatment with competitive angiotensin antagonists (113). Intracerebroventricular injections of eledoisin, physalaemin, and kassinin were of equal potency, neurokinin A and substance P were less potent, and neurokinin B was the least potent (364). In ducks, third ventricular injections of bombesin caused dose-dependent drinking, but ANG II was ~10 times more potent; eledoisin was less effective than bombesin, and substance P was almost completely inactive (115). Tachykinins and bombesin were also effective dipsogens injected intraperitoneally, but doses had to be increased at least 1,000 times. Destruction of the SFO in pigeons did not affect drinking in response to intracerebroventricular tachykinins or bombesins, and although the response to intraperitoneal but not intracerebroventricular injection of ANG II was reduced, the responses to intraperitoneal injection of bombesins and the more modest responses to intramuscular injection of tachykinins were unaffected (359, 360).

In the rat, intracranial injection of eledoisin, physalaemin, substance P, or bombesin caused dose-dependent inhibition of drinking to various dipsogenic stimuli including central ANG II, an effect opposite to that produced by these substances in the pigeon (116, 117, 191). Tachykinins also caused vasopressin release and water conservation (90). Eledoisin-induced vasopressin release may have been mediated by central ANG II, because it was blocked by saralasin (445). Inhibition of drinking by tachykinins was centrally mediated and behaviorally selective in that feeding was unaffected, or less affected in the case of bombesin, than drinking. Angiotensin II-induced drinking tended to be inhibited by lower intracranial doses of eledoisin, physalaemin, and substance P than drinking induced by other thirst stimuli such as intracranial carbachol, water deprivation, or systemic hypertonic NaCl. Because ANG II caused increased substance P immunoreactivity release from superfused preparation of hypothalamic and medullary tissue (132), this could be one of the ways in which ANG II-induced drinking is terminated. Angiotensin II-induced drinking was more powerfully inhibited by the nonmammalian tachykinins, eledoisin and physalaemin, than by substance P (118), presumably because of the greater resistance of nonmammalian tachykinins to degradation in rats, but mammalian neuropeptide gamma  was equipotent with eledoisin and physalaemin and has a similar spectrum of antidipsogenic action. Inhibition of ANG II-induced drinking by neuropeptide gamma  can be reversed by the nonpeptide NK-1 receptor antagonist WIN-62577 (458). On the basis of the rank order of inhibition of drinking by naturally occurring tachykinins and tachykinin receptor-selective synthetic peptides, it has been suggested that the tachykinin receptor subtypes involved in the central inhibitory effects of the tachykinins in rats are NK-1 for ANG II-induced water intake and NK-2 for cell dehydration-induced drinking (366). Some tachykinins have a much narrower spectrum of antidipsogenic activity that seems to exclude their involvement in angiotensinergic thirst.

Tachykinins also inhibit sodium appetite in rats (118) and other mammals. Tachykinin inhibition of NaCl intake may be mediated by NK-3 receptors (366, 456). Intracranial eledoisin, followed by kassinin and neurokinin A, exerted potent and long-lasting inhibition of NaCl intake, whereas physalaemin and neurokinin B were much less effective (118). Intracerebroventricular injection of kassinin attenuated sodium depletion-induced NaCl intake in the rat and the increased NaCl intake caused by intraventricular renin or subcutaneous DOCA (365). Kassinin also inhibited need-free or palatability-induced NaCl intake, but it did not interfere with food intake, indicating that it has a general suppressive effect on salt intake, irrespective of the natriorexigenic treatment or whether sodium was needed or not. The sodium intake of sodium-depleted sheep, rabbits, and cows was inhibited by intracerebroventricular eledoisin (596). Continuous intracerebroventricular infusion of eledoisin, NH2-senktide and, to a lesser extent, substance P attenuated the enhanced need-free NaCl intake in female rats that had been subjected to repeated sodium depletion (456). When the NK-3-selective tachykinins, eledoisin and NH2-senktide, were injected directly into the medial amygdala of the rat, the increased sodium appetite after sodium depletion or injection of renin into the lateral ventricle was reduced but not the appetite aroused by DOCA treatment (363). Because there is evidence that the amygdala is the target for mineralocorticoid natriorexigenic action (see sect. VIF), this might mean that inhibition of NaCl intake by the tachykinins is selective for angiotensinergic mechanisms. However, this selectivity may only apply to the amygdala because after intracerebroventricular injection of tachykinins there is also inhibition of DOCA-induced sodium appetite.

F. Opioids

Opioid peptide-producing neurons and opiate receptors are present in the hypothalamus, SFO, ventral lamina terminalis, and other brain regions associated with ANG II-induced drinking behavior and the control of body fluid and electrolyte homeostasis. Opioids and their antagonists have marked effects on drinking in response to ANG II and other dipsogenic and natriorexigenic challenges. In the rat, intracerebroventricular injection of the naturally occurring opioids, beta -endorphin, Leu-enkephalin, or Met-enkephalin, inhibited intracerebroventricular ANG II-induced water intake, vasopressin release, and increases in blood pressure (113, 577-579). These effects were prevented by the opioid antagonist naloxone. After the initial inhibition of drinking and antidiuresis, there was a delayed polydipsia apparently mediated by an increase in plasma renin caused by beta -adrenergic stimulation of central origin affecting the kidney. The amphibian opioid heptapeptide dermorphin and especially the synthetic derivative [D-Ala2,D-Leu5]enkephalin were even more effective against ANG II-induced drinking (113). Dermorphin-like immunoreactivity is found in the SFO, OVLT, and arcuate nucleus of the rat, and it therefore has a more restricted distribution in the central nervous system than the enkephalins and endorphins. When injected into the SFO, dermorphin inhibited intracerebroventricular ANG II-induced drinking more effectively than when it was injected into the lateral ventricle (444). After destruction of the SFO, higher doses of dermorphin were needed to attenuate drinking. Inhibition seemed to be selective; drinking induced by subcutaneous injection of hypertonic NaCl or after a period of water deprivation was unaffected by doses of dermorphin that were effective against ANG II-induced drinking.

Although these results suggest that opioid pathways are mainly inhibitory to drinking behavior, other results show that opioids may cause increased drinking. The opioid antagonists naloxone and naltrexone inhibit spontaneous and water deprivation-induced drinking, acting on sites within the central nervous system (64). Low doses of morphine and other opioids cause dose-dependent increases in water intake after an initial depression in the first 2 h after injection (16, 446), and naloxone inhibits ANG II-induced drinking (63, 577) and may inhibit sodium appetite (108), results which suggest that endogenous opioids could also stimulate, or at least facilitate, thirst and sodium appetite. It is worth noting that opioid peptides also have mixed stimulatory or inhibitory effects on the release of many of the hormones of the hypothalamo-pituitary axis (358). Morphine-induced drinking was suppressed by bilateral nephrectomy (446), which together with the delay in onset of drinking could mean that renal renin was responsible for any stimulatory effects on drinking, although this is unlikely to be the entire explanation. The pattern of drinking of water-deprived animals after naloxone or naltrexone suggests that satiety may be enhanced by the drug treatment (108), but naloxone in low doses may also stimulate drinking (430), giving a different perspective on the possible role of endogenous opioids in drinking behavior. There are two opposing interpretations of the way in which they could act: opioid receptor antagonists inhibit ANG II-induced drinking by blocking the action of the endogenous opioid ligands that normally facilitate drinking, or, alternatively, endogenous opioid ligands that are displaced by naloxone or naltrexone inhibit drinking (577).

It is likely that some of the complex effects of opioid peptides and their antagonists on drinking behavior, whether stimulatory or inhibitory, depend on anatomic location, dose, and which type of receptor is affected (222, 577). The effects of receptor-selective antagonists on drinking behavior are complex and not easy to interpret. Three serpentine membrane-spanning opiate receptors coupled to G protein have been characterized, µ, kappa , and delta , with different pharmacological properties and functions. For example, µ- and delta -opiate receptor agonists increase striatal release of dopamine, whereas kappa -receptor agonists inhibit dopamine, and µ-opiate receptor agonists inhibit norepinephrine release from the locus ceruleus (358). Systemic naltrexone inhibited drinking in response to subcutaneous ANG II (500 µg/kg) or hypertonic saline, but naltrexone (1-50 µg) injected into the lateral ventricle only inhibited drinking in response to intracerebroventricular ANG II (20 ng) (504). Intracerebroventricular ANG II- and systemic hypertonic saline-induced drinking were both reduced by intracerebroventricular injection of the selective kappa -receptor antagonist nor-binaltorphamine and by the µ-receptor antagonist beta -funaltrexamine, whereas the µ1-antagonist naloxonazine stimulated drinking after hypertonic saline. The delta 1-antagonist [D-Ala2,D-Leu5,D-Cys6]enkephalin caused a significant reduction in ANG II- but not hypertonic saline-induced drinking. The conclusion was that µ2-, delta 1-, and kappa -opioid binding sites modulate ANG II-induced drinking. Although the effects of administered opioids and their antagonists on drinking are powerful, the physiological role of endogenously released opioids in ANG II-induced and other drinking behavior is unresolved. It is likely that they are involved in a number of different mechanisms.

G. Endothelins

Endothelins (ETs) are antidipsogenic. Endothelin-1, ET-2, and ET-3 are 21-amino acid peptides, originally isolated from endothelial cell cultures. They are powerful vasoconstrictors and have widespread cardiovascular and renal effects. Two serpentine transmembrane receptors have been cloned, ETA and ETB , and these are coupled to G proteins. Endothelins are produced in the brain as well as in the periphery. The distribution of receptors for ETs in mouse brain (348) is remarkably similar to that for ANG II in rat and includes the AV3V region and SFO. Drinking in rat after an 18-h period of water deprivation, systemic hypertonic NaCl, or intracerebroventricular ANG II was inhibited by prior injection of ET-3 (the ET synthesized in the hypothalamus) into the third ventricle (515). In other experiments, inhibition of ANG II-induced drinking by ETs was confirmed, and the receptor subtype was identified (514). Injection of ET-2 into the third ventricle just before ANG II caused significant dose-related inhibition of drinking. Endothelin-2 does not discriminate between ETA and ETB receptors, but because ANG II-induced drinking was unaffected by the ETB-selective agonist but was significantly accentuated by the ETA antagonist BQ-123, the antidipsogenic effects of ETs may be mediated by the ETA receptor subtype. Angiotensin II is known to release ET from cultured endothelial cells. If it does this also in brain, a possible physiological role for ETs is to terminate a bout of ANG II-induced drinking, adding yet another neuroactive substance to the list of potential inhibitors.

H. Natriuretic Peptides

Atrial natriuretic peptides inhibit drinking behavior. Three endogenous ligands, atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), and C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP), and two bioactive receptor subtypes, ANP-A and ANP-B, have been characterized (279); a third receptor, ANP-C, may be a clearance receptor. Originally isolated from porcine brain, BNP is now known to be produced mainly in the heart. C-type natriuretic peptide is a neuropeptide. The peptides and their receptors are widely distributed in brain tissue, especially in the AV3V region, basal medial hypothalamus, NTS, brain stem, and CVOs, the brain regions that are particularly involved in drinking behavior, body fluid homeostasis, and blood pressure regulation (248). In rat, the major brain receptor is ANP-B for which the ligand is CNP. Central nervous and peripheral effects of ANP are mainly if not exclusively mediated through cGMP. Natriuretic peptides may contribute to the tonic control of blood pressure, sympathetic outflow, and baroreceptor sensitivity especially in SH rats and to a lesser extent in WK rats (432). In addition to their inhibitory effects on thirst and sodium appetite, circulating natriuretic peptides inhibit sympathetic nervous activity, vasopressin release, renal renin release and aldosterone secretion, leading to a fall in blood pressure and increased urinary loss of water and sodium. The actions of natriuretic peptides are generally the opposite of those of ANG II and are seen best in the setting of ANG II stimulation of thirst and sodium appetite.

In the rat, ANP given by intracerebroventricular injection or intravenously caused dose-dependent inhibition of water intake in rats made thirsty by mild dehydration or intracerebroventricular ANG II but not by intracerebroventricular carbachol (13, 415). Intracerebroventricular BNP was also effective against intracerebroventricular ANG II-induced drinking (285). One site of the inhibitory effect is the SFO, since ANP injected here attenuated drinking induced by ANG II or water deprivation (139). Atrial natriuretic peptide injected into the third ventricle also reduced NaCl preference in sodium-depleted rats (14). Atrial natriuretic peptide infused into the lateral cerebral ventricle attenuated the exaggerated sodium appetite shown by SH rats but did not affect NaCl intake in WK controls (284). This result is of interest in view of evidence that ANG II may be important in the increased sodium appetite of SH rats as discussed in section VII. Intracerebroventricular ANP also inhibited water and NaCl intake in wild rabbits (600).

The inhibitory effects of natriuretic peptides on drinking behavior complement their effects on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, kidney, and vasculature which led to increased excretion and a fall in blood pressure. These effects are physiologically consistent with the possible role of natriuretic peptides in normalizing an expanded extracellular fluid volume. It is not known whether ANP of cardiac or brain (including CNP) origin is the more important, but because the inhibitory effects could be mediated by intravenous ANP and one of the sites of inhibition was the SFO, ANP of cardiac origin could certainly play a part. Also consistent with the inhibitory effect of ANP on drinking is the action of exogenous ANP on hindbrain sites, especially the NTS, to lower blood pressure, although it is pressor when injected into the anterior hypothalamus. In humans, ANP has also been reported to depress osmotic thirst but not osmotically stimulated vasopressin release; it is not known whether it also affects angiotensin responsiveness (81). In dogs, no evidence was found to support the view that central ANP is a physiological regulator of the renin-angiotensin or vasopressin systems during osmotic and hypovolemic challenges; third ventricular infusions of ANP did not affect the changes in plasma ANG II and vasopressin induced by dehydration and bleeding (588). However, drinking responses were not examined in this experiment, and the possible involvement of other natriuretic peptides in these functions has yet to be ruled out.

I. Vasopressin

Magnocellular and parvocellular vasopressin-containing neurons are present in the SON, PVN, and suprachiasmatic nucleus. The magnocellular neurons terminate in the posterior pituitary, where vasopressin is stored and released into the bloodstream in increased amounts in response to increases in effective osmolality or hypovolemia, but many of the central nervous structures involved in the control of water intake have vasopressin receptors that are innervated by vasopressinergic fibers originating from parvocellular neurons. For both vasopressin and oxytocin, the magnocellular systems are representative of neurosecretory endocrine neurons, whereas it seems that parvocellular neurons constitute peptidergic neurotransmitter pathways. Peripheral administration of ANG II can stimulate vasopressin release by acting on CVOs or directly on the pituitary; intracranial ANG II can also cause vasopressin release (506). Vasopressin is released by cellular dehydration and hypovolemia, and it is the major hormone of water conservation through its antidiuretic effect (54, 55). It may also play a role in control of water intake by increasing the sensitivity of neural thirst systems (186, 586). These peripheral and central actions of vasopressin complement each other and highlight the importance of the hormone in the water economy of the body.

In dogs, intravenous vasopressin lowered the threshold of drinking in response to intravenous hyperosmotic NaCl (587), and injection of vasopressin into the third ventricle stimulated water intake (590). There was a small and inconsistent stimulating effect of intracranial vasopressin in the rat (418). Increased thirst has been observed in the human clinical syndrome of inappropriate secretion of vasopressin or SIADH (586). Reduction in vasopressin secretion in hypothalamic diabetes insipidus may affect the setting of the osmotic thirst mechanism so that thirst may not keep pace with fluid loss, leading to significant plasma hyperosmolality. Infusion of V1 or V2 vasopressin antagonists into the third cerebral ventricle suppressed osmotic thirst in the dog (589). In view of the stimulating effect of vasopressin on water intake, and because cellular dehydration releases vasopressin, stimulates water intake, and inhibits NaCl intake (205), an attractive speculation is that vasopressin released by vasopressinergic neurons determines this pattern by inhibiting NaCl intake and favoring water intake. It has to be said that in the rat present evidence is that oxytocin may do this as discussed in the next section.

Vasopressin is colocalized with ANG II in the magnocellular neurosecretory cells of the SON and PVN (342). Angiotensin II and vasopressin are also colocalized with CRH in the parvocellular system of the tuberoinfundibular component of the PVN, where the three peptides may be responsible for ACTH secretion. Whether there is corelease and interaction of peptides on a single target tissue in these examples of colocalization is unknown. In the rat, iontophoretically applied vasopressin excited neurons in the SFO, medial POA, and diagonal band, and these neurons also responded to ANG II (421). When vasopressin and ANG II were applied simultaneously, there was usually additivity or even potentiation of the effects of each peptide applied individually. The common responsiveness of neurons to the two hormones that play homeostatic roles in cellular dehydration and hypovolemia could partly account for the additivity of the drinking responses to cellular dehydration and hypovolemia that is observed when these fluid deficits are simultaneously present (184). However, there is no evidence that lack of vasopressin affects ANG II-induced drinking; the Brattleboro rat responds normally to intracranial ANG II (see sect. XI).

J. Oxytocin

Oxytocin is synthesized in the magnocellular neurons of the PVN and SON and is released from the posterior pituitary into the bloodstream. In addition to its well-known effects in parturition and milk ejection, systemic oxytocin is natriorexigenic in wild rabbits, and it and other hormones associated with the various stages of pregnancy and lactation are thought to be responsible for the spectacular rises in sodium appetite that occur in some species at these times (122). However, evidence in rats suggests that oxytocin from parvocellular neurons acting as a neurotransmitter or paracrine agent may also inhibit sodium appetite, including that induced by ANG II, in circumstances where water is the more urgent and immediate need as in cellular dehydration or severe hypovolemia. There are parvocellular oxytocin-containing neurons in the PVN and other scattered clusters of neurons that project widely in the central nervous system to receptors in limbic sites and as far as the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus in the brain stem. The function of these neurons is not well understood, but because oxytocin is released by increases in effective osmolality and by hypovolemia (568), it has been suggested that a subset of oxytocinergic neurons in the PVN may operate as an inhibitory system to sodium appetite, switching drinking toward water away from NaCl (565, 571, 572). A similar role could be envisaged for vasopressin, the hormone released by these stimuli, although evidence is lacking.

Water is always the immediate requirement whether the stimulus to increased drinking is cellular dehydration or hypovolemia. The oxytocinergic system could operate to ensure that thirst takes precedence over sodium appetite in either of these states. It is well-established that hyperosmolality resulting from administration of osmotically effective solutes such as hyperosmotic NaCl or sucrose causes increased intake of water and that an existing sodium appetite is inhibited (205). Sodium appetite is absent in hyperosmolality because, according to the oxytocin hypothesis, it is inhibited by increased activity of the oxytocinergic neurons in the PVN. The fact that in rat systemic oxytocin is also natriuretic (636) complements the proposed central action. In severe hypovolemia with high plasma ANG II, drinking behavior is initially similar to that caused by cellular dehydration with increased water intake only, but it changes later to increased NaCl intake, again an appropriate response because extracellular solute is also required. Water needed to repair the plasma volume deficit is drunk immediately. As water is drunk, the body fluids become hypotonic and oxytocin levels that were high before rehydration start to fall. The excitatory effects of hypovolemia on sodium appetite now become manifest, and NaCl intake starts to increase. Such a mechanism could explain the delay in the onset of NaCl intake in hypovolemia. The evidence for this hypothesis is mainly indirect and may apply only to the rat (635). In other experimental conditions in which there is increased sodium appetite, there is an inverse relation between plasma oxytocin and NaCl intake. However, raising circulating oxytocin levels did not inhibit NaCl intake, nor did systemic administration of an oxytocin antagonist enhance intake in polyethylene glycol-treated rats. This may be because plasma oxytocin is not itself the inhibitory signal, but simply a peripheral marker of parallel activity in the central oxytocinergic pathways that inhibit sodium appetite. Direct support for the hypothesis is provided by the finding that intracerebroventricular ANG II caused a larger and earlier intake of NaCl without any change in water intake after injection of the oxytocin antagonist, ornithine vasotocin, or inactivation of oxytocin receptors by lateral cerebroventricular injections of the cytotoxin, ricin-A conjugated to oxytocin, than after ANG II alone (42, 572). Similarly, after oxytocin antagonists or inactivation of oxytocin receptors, rats increased their intakes of NaCl as well as water in response to increased plasma osmolality induced by intraperitoneal hyperosmotic mannitol instead of just taking water (43, 572). Hypertonic mannitol was found to inhibit NaCl intake induced by hypovolemia but not after inactivation of central oxytocin receptors. These results are compatible with the view that the delay in the onset of ANG II-induced NaCl intake is partly because of inhibition by central oxytocinergic neurons. How the hypothesis is to be reconciled with increased sodium appetite during lactation described long ago by Richter (479) and abundantly confirmed since, and the natriorexigenic effect of systemic oxytocin in wild rabbits (122), has yet to be addressed. The seeming contradiction could be accounted for by peripheral and central oxytocin having diametrically opposite effects on NaCl intake. The arguments applied to oxytocin may also apply to peripheral and central release of vasopressin, although this has not yet been examined in species other than the rat. In dogs, intracerebroventricular vasopressin stimulated water intake and intracerebroventricular infusion of V1 or V2 vasopressin antagonists suppressed osmotic thirst (see sect. VIIII); it is easy to imagine opposing effects on NaCl intake, although this remains to be tested.

K. Prostaglandins

Prostaglandins, prostacyclin, and other eicosanoids act as local hormones or paracrine agents in many physiological processes, among which may be control of renal renin release and inhibition of drinking. In rat, PGE1 or PGE2 injected into the brain or the periphery inhibited drinking in response to water deprivation, hypovolemia induced by hyperoncotic dialysis (see sect. XC), and especially drinking to intracerebroventricular or systemic ANG II (304, 305). Drinking in response to pure cellular dehydration was not affected by intracerebroventricular PGE, but it was inhibited by intraperitoneal injection. Food intake was not affected by PGEs. Opposing the inhibitory effect of PGEs by pretreatment with indomethacin enhanced the dipsogenic effect of ANG II (443). Because of these results, it has been suggested that endogenous PG production may act as a natural satiety signal, bringing drinking to an end and in this way preventing the animal from overhydrating itself when it responds to various thirst stimuli but especially to ANG II. In view of the stimulating effect of ANG-(1--7) on PG synthesis (see sect. VD) and the possibility that PGs act as natural satiety factors, the intensity of thirst (or sodium appetite) may depend on a balance between production of ANG II (or III) and ANG-(1--7). However, there are difficulties with this speculation. Some PGs are implicated in fever produced by various pyrogens, linking receptor activation in the hypothalamus to an increase in the temperature set point. This means that the effect of PGs on drinking may be secondary to alterations in core temperature so that reduced water intake could simply be the result of general malaise. There are also apparently marked species differences; for example, intracerebroventricular PGE augmented drinking in the goat in response to intracerebroventricular ANG II, eliciting the comment that the central actions of PGE1 and ANG II were strikingly similar, although PGE was not dipsogenic on its own (335). There are also many other substances that inhibit ANG II-induced drinking so that whatever the inhibitory role of PGs in drinking behavior, it is unlikely to be unique.

L. Nitric Oxide

Nitric oxide is considered to exert a neurotransmitter or paracrine role in the central nervous system, and it is therefore potentially important in the regulation of ANG II-induced and other types of drinking behavior. However, there have been contradictory reports on the effects of central nitric oxide on drinking. Constitutive nitric oxide synthase has been identified in varying amounts in all areas of animal and human brain tissue (399). Nitric oxide synthases are expressed in various tissues including neurons and astrocytes in the central nervous system as well as endothelial cells (643). Inducible enzyme activity occurs in astrocyte cultures and may be associated with neurotoxicity. Nitric oxide is an unstable and readily diffusible nonpolar gas that cannot be stored in vesicles in nerve terminals but is synthesized by the constitutive enzyme by a calcium-dependent process when excitation reaches the nerve terminals. It stimulates soluble guanylate cyclase in brain homogenates, acting directly on the enzyme and not via a cell surface receptor. Angiotensin II may affect cGMP through the AT2 receptor, and neurotransmission by acetylcholine and excitatory amino acids has long been known to be associated with elevated cGMP levels. Therefore, nitric oxide could be involved in short-term effects of these substances. It could be involved in long-term potentiation of synaptic transmission linked to learning and memory formation, in effects on brain development, as well as in the biological effects of other neurotransmitters whose actions involve cGMP (399, 400).

Some work indicates that nitric oxide is inhibitory. In one experiment, activation of the L-arginine-nitric oxide pathway by injection of L-arginine into the lateral ventricle of water-deprived rats or rats given a large intracranial dose (250 ng) of ANG II inhibited the drinking caused by these two stimuli in a dose-dependent fashion (82, 83). The POA was suggested as one of the central sites for the antidipsogenic activity of nitric oxide because a smaller dose of L-arginine that was ineffective when injected into the lateral ventricle inhibited drinking by water deprived-rats when injected into the POA. The D-enantiomer was inactive, and inhibition of water deprivation-induced drinking by L-arginine could be reversed by antagonizing guanylate cyclase with methylene blue and nitric oxide synthase with NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME). The effect of L-NAME on the L-arginine attenuation of ANG II-induced drinking was not examined. Acetylsalicylic acid injected into the POA also antagonized the antidipsogenic effect of POA injection of L-arginine, suggesting that the antidipsogenic action requires prostaglandin synthesis. Nitric oxide may also be inhibitory to sodium appetite; rats maintained on 1.0% NaCl containing L-NAME for 6 wk showed increases in NaCl intake compared with the untreated controls, but there were no differences in intake between L-NAME-treated rats maintained on water and their controls (161).

Other evidence supports a stimulatory role for nitric oxide in drinking behavior, including ANG II-induced drinking. Central inhibition of nitric oxide synthase with NG-monomethyl-L-arginine has been found to attenuate drinking by a small amount in rats that had been deprived of water for 24 h, and to reduce glucose utilization in the SFO without affecting the enhanced glucose utilization of water deprivation in the hypothalamo-hypophysial system (297). Intracerebroventricular injection of L-arginine or the nitric oxide donor diethylenetriamine nitric oxide adduct augmented drinking by water-deprived rats (409). Recently, it has been found that intracerebroventricular injection of L-NAME (125 and 250 µg) antagonized drinking in response to intracerebroventricular ANG II (25 pmol) and that this effect could be reversed by coinjection of L-arginine (690). However, L-NAME did not alter the pattern of ANG II-induced c-fos expression in the SFO, OVLT, MnPO nucleus, SON, and PVN, suggesting that c-fos expression is not a necessary part of ANG II-induced drinking, although it serves as an excellent marker of neuronal activation (see sect. VIA). There was a high rate of codistribution of NADPH-diaphorase (a nitric oxide synthase) staining and c-fos expression in response to intracerebroventricular injection of ANG II but a low rate of colocalization of the two markers to individual cells, which also suggests that ANG II stimulates nitric oxide production and c-fos expression in different populations of neurons. These experiments suggest that ANG II interacts with nitric oxide in the control of drinking but not in c-fos expression.

M. Other Neuroactive Substances

Adrenomedullin is a 52-amino acid peptide first isolated from human pheochromocytoma tissue, found in many tissues including the brain, especially in the thalamus and hypothalamus (519). It is vasodilator, diuretic, and natriuretic. It acts on both parts of the adrenal gland to inhibit catecholamine and aldosterone secretion and on the pituitary to inhibit ACTH. When injected into the lateral ventricle, adrenomedullin caused a dose-dependent reduction in the amounts of water drunk in response to intracerebroventricular ANG II (100 pmol), hyperosmolality, and overnight deprivation of water, without affecting blood pressure, heart rate, or motor activity (410).

Glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1-(7--36) amide is a gastrointestinal hormone found in the L cells of the gut, belonging to the glucagon/secretin group of peptides. Both GLP-1-(7--36) and its pancreatic receptors are important in the control of blood glucose, but GLP-1 receptors are also present in rat brain in the hypothalamus and CVOs. Injection of GLP-1-(7--36) amide into the lateral ventricle inhibited food intake in rats, but intraperitoneal injection was ineffective. The GLP-1-(7--36) amide was also antidipsogenic, with both intracerebroventricular and intraperitoneal administration causing marked inhibition of intracerebroventricular ANG II-induced (50 ng) drinking, whereas GLP-1-(1--36) was inactive (595). The inhibitory effect was accompanied by diuresis and natriuresis and was prevented by coinjection of the GLP-1 antagonist exendin-(9--39) amide.

Histamine-containing neurons in the posterior hypothalamus run via the medial forebrain bundle to limbic and thalamic structures and large areas of the cortex and hippocampus. Many functions have been ascribed to this diffuse histaminergic system, including arousal, autonomic and endocrine function, temperature regulation, and drinking behavior. Histamine injected into the POA, LH, and LHA caused dose-dependent drinking in rat (334), but how this is related to the central dipsogenic action of ANG II is not known. Histamine is also a systemic dipsogen, the effects of which are partly mediated through renal renin. This is discussed in section IXD.

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is a 36-amino acid peptide belonging to the pancreatic polypeptide family of hormones and is a central regulator of energy homeostasis (624, 661). It is expressed by neurons in brain and the periphery and acts on three distinct receptor types, Y1 , Y2 , and Y3 . It is widely distributed in the central nervous system, where it is colocalized with norepinephrine and epinephrine in catecholamine cell groups in the brain stem that send afferent fibers to the PVN (555). Levels of NPY are particularly high in the hypothalamus. In the rat, injection of NPY into the PVN caused a large dose-dependent increase in feeding and some increase in water intake (555), but in the mouse, intracerebroventricular NPY inhibited drinking associated with feeding or resulting from water deprivation (404). The hypothalamic receptor for feeding behavior is a subtype of Y1 . Occurrence of NPY with catecholamines in the brain stem of rat suggests a possible connection with ANG II-induced drinking, but there is no evidence that this is the case.

Neurotensin is a tridecapeptide originally isolated from bovine hypothalamus, and it is a putative neurotransmitter. It is localized in neuronal cell bodies, receptors exist, and its release from storage vesicles in nerve terminals is calcium dependent. Iontophoretic application increases neuronal firing. Neurotensin is released from the intestine during feeding, and when injected into the PVN, it caused dose-dependent reductions in food intake but it had no effect on water intake (554). In contrast to the lack of effect of intracranial neurotensin on drinking, intravenous administration caused an increase in water intake in food-deprived rats. It may therefore contribute to food-associated drinking. It is not known whether neurotensin affects sodium appetite. Given intravenously, neurotensin is hypotensive and causes histamine release. Drinking could therefore be mediated by renal renin.

Pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide 38 (PACAP-38) has been isolated from ovine hypothalamic tissue. It is widely distributed in peripheral tissues and in the central nervous system in rats with the highest concentrations in the hypothalamus. Also, PACAP-38 caused dose-dependent increases in water intake when injected bilaterally into the perifornical lateral hypothalamus (459).

N. Comment

The neuroactive substances affecting drinking behavior are varied, and they include both the classical nonpeptide neurotransmitters and certain peptides. The peptides are the most numerous class of intercellular signals, and they may have powerful effects on drinking behavior. It is unlikely that all are exclusively engaged in short-term signaling processes; some may be concerned with long-term changes in neuronal organization and growth. The diversity and complexity of their structure suggest different modes of action for neuropeptides compared with the simpler neurotransmitters such as norepinephrine and acetylcholine. Some neuropeptides may act as conventional neurotransmitters at synapses, but others may have more widespread effects, acting at a distance from their point of release. In view of the central role of limbic structures in thirst and sodium appetite, it is noteworthy that these structures are rich in neuroactive peptides, including angiotensin peptides. For most neuroactive agents affecting drinking behavior, very little is known about the nature and significance of their involvement in physiological thirst and sodium appetite and their interaction with ANG II. In many experiments, no attempt has been made to discover whether the effects of a neuroactive agent are mainly on thirst, sodium appetite, or both of these. It is of course doubtful whether any of them, including ANG II itself, is exclusively concerned with thirst and sodium appetite. The idea of neural systems with unique chemical codes subserving particular functions such as hypovolemic thirst, sodium appetite, satiety, vasopressin release, and so on, is not in accord with the widespread distribution and known multiple actions of many neuroactive agents, and colocalization in neurons also argues against it. A chemical phrenology as simplistic as one chemical/one function is as unlikely as an anatomic one, yet behavior is embedded in neural networks, and the properties of the various ligands and the receptors that they affect are part of the identity of those networks.

Interaction between angiotensin peptides of whatever source and other neuroactive substances may result in either stimulation or inhibition of drinking behavior, and interaction may be at the cellular level or through convergence of different neuronal pathways. An important example of the latter is in the ventral lamina terminalis, where ascending noradrenergic and other pathways of the brain stem/NTS system from volume receptors and baroreceptors converge with angiotensinergic neurons there subserving blood volume control. In the rat, the tachykinins, PGs, and some other neuroactive substances may act as satiety factors to bring ANG II-induced drinking to a halt. Also in the rat, the parvocellular oxytocin-containing neurons in the PVN may operate as an inhibitory system in sodium appetite, delaying, for example, the onset of ANG II-induced NaCl intake in hypovolemia until enough water has been taken to restore volume. It seems possible that vasopressinergic pathways could play the same role in some species; vasotocin, the evolutionary progenitor of vasopressin and oxytocin, has the oxytocin ring and vasopressin side chain, and it may be an evolutionary accident which neurohypophysial peptide becomes the dominant one affecting the pattern of fluid intake. Other central neurotransmitters may also switch drinking behavior toward water intake, delaying NaCl intake when immediate restoration of volume is vital for survival and must take priority over the restoration of osmolality.

Where it has been established that ANG II is colocalized in particular neurons with other neuroactive substances, it is reasonable to suppose that the colocalized substances are coreleased from nerve endings, although this has yet to be shown for ANG II. Substances released could act locally on the same or different postsynaptic receptors or on the presynaptic endings themselves, or they could diffuse some distance in extracellular fluid before exerting a paracrine effect on other receptors. But what causes their release is generally uncertain, and nothing is known about the proportions released and whether release is simultaneous or sequential. The functional significance of cotransmission could be to allow for an immediate but short-lived response followed by a slower and longer-lasting response, the latter helping to maintain drinking, which is necessarily a prolonged activity. We can also speculate that this depends on the nature of the physiological need and that it could be a factor governing the type of behavior aroused. In particular, some of the features of sodium appetite such as persistence and learning from previous experience could be accounted for by long-term modification by synergistic postsynaptic and presynaptic or paracrine actions of coreleased transmitters. Peptides may mediate the slower trophic effects, but because their molecular size is large compared with classical transmitters, few molecules are available for release. Therefore, corelease of another transmitter might be needed to amplify and perhaps focus and confine the response to a particular set of neurons.

An important limitation to our understanding of the possible dipsogenic and natriorexigenic roles of the neurotransmitters and other neuroactive agents considered here is that practically all the observations have been made in the rat only. For very few neuroactive substances is there information about their effects on drinking behavior in other species, but where this is available the effects have sometimes been different from those in the rat. The tachykinins are a case in point, since they are dipsogenic in pigeon and antidipsogenic in rat, but ANP, PGs, and cholinergic agents show species differences. The apparent universality of ANG II-induced drinking behavior in the different vertebrate groups is in striking contrast to the species variability shown by many other neuroactive substances. This may simply be an accident of their neurotransmitter role in the particular anatomic pathways reached by the intracranial injection. In these cases, the nature of the molecule is presumably less important than it is for the angiotensin peptides, particularly with the simpler nonpeptide neurotransmitters. It reinforces the view that drinking caused by ANG II depends on the peptide exerting volume or paracrine effects in the brain. A second limitation is methodological. The remarks made in section IIIF about the artificiality of an intracranial injection of ANG II as a representation of the process of normal access of endogenously released peptide to its receptors in physiological circumstances apply with equal force to other neuroactive substances. Hypotheses on the possible roles of such substances as chemical messengers in the nervous pathways involved in the various aspects of drinking behavior based on the effects of intracranial injections must be tentative. In the first instance, it is reasonable to assume that when a neurotransmitter is given by intracranial injection at a particular anatomic locus, it will probably have similar effects on thirst and sodium appetite as it does when it is released endogenously. However, it is also likely that only the dominant effect will be manifest, and this may obscure other important actions of the substance when it is released physiologically in situ. An explanation of this sort might account for the quite opposite effects of a particular substance in different animal species. The actions of endogenously released neurotransmitters presumably depend on the particular anatomic pattern of their release. An intracranial injection produces an imperfect copy of this. The ways in which intakes of water and NaCl are influenced by central neurotransmitter/paracrine systems must in the end depend on the status of the body fluids, as monitored by stretch receptors and possibly chemoreceptors in the cardiovascular system and by osmoreceptors. Inputs from all these receptors must be incorporated in any picture of overall control, but apart from ascending noradrenergic pathways of the brain stem/NTS system from volume receptors and baroreceptors converging on angiotensinergic neurons in the ventral lamina terminalis, very little is known about how these inputs interact with the various neuroactive substances considered in this section.

    IX. DRUG-INDUCED HYPERRENINEMIA AND DRINKING
Top
Previous
Next
References

Some drugs and naturally occurring substances can stimulate enough renal renin secretion to cause increased drinking, showing that the animal's own kidneys contain releasable dipsogenic quantities of renin. These substances may stimulate renin secretion by acting on the juxtaglomerular cells directly (e.g., isoproterenol) or reflexly through the alterations in vascular tone they produce (e.g., alpha 1-adrenergic antagonists and vasodilators), by causing increased fluid loss (e.g., furosemide), or by opening negative-feedback loops (e.g., ACE inhibitors). They are listed in Table 6 with other substances causing increased thirst or sodium appetite. Some substances have the potential for causing complex effects on drinking. For example, histamine stimulates renal renin secretion, and it is also a neurotransmitter that causes increased drinking when given by intracranial injection (see sect. VIIIM). The peripheral actions of substances may also be complex, with hemodynamic, renal, and other effects contributing to the direct stimulating effect of increased circulating ANG II on drinking.

A. beta -Adrenergics

Isoproterenol (isoprenaline) is a nonselective beta -adrenergic agonist that releases renal renin by acting on beta 1-adrenoceptors in the juxtaglomerular apparatus, directly and also through reflex activation of sympathetic nerves by the hemodynamic effects and fall in arterial blood pressure that it also produces. Isoproterenol is a powerful stimulus to drinking in the rat (333, 687) and dog (202) but not in the goat (431) or mouse (499). Drinking in the rat and dog is dose dependent, and there is simultaneous antidiuresis. In the rat, the maximum water intake was ~15 ml in 3 h after an isoproterenol dose of 0.33 mg/kg; in the dog, 1.6 mg produced an intake of over 700 ml in 2 h.

The extent of renal renin involvement in isoproterenol-induced drinking is debatable. In one investigation in the rat, Houpt and Epstein (272) found that drinking was almost completely abolished by bilateral nephrectomy but not by ureteric ligation. For this reason, the authors entitled their paper, "The complete dependence of beta-adrenergic drinking on the renal dipsogen." Isoproterenol-induced changes in blood pressure, renin release, plasma ANG II concentrations, and drinking showed similar dose-dependency and time course (290, 328, 331). Reflex activation of juxtaglomerular beta 1-adrenoceptors by alpha -adrenergic antagonists also caused increased renin release and drinking (386). The alpha 2-adrenergic agonist clonidine, which reduces sympathetic discharge, caused a decrease in renin secretion and inhibited isoproterenol-induced drinking in a dose-related manner (217). Results with the ACE inhibitor teprotide were interpreted (see sect. IXC) as meaning that isoproterenol-induced drinking in rat is renin independent (332), but other experiments in which a range of doses of the ACE inhibitor captopril were tested indicated that renin was involved (300). Depleting the kidneys of renin by maintaining rats on a regime of daily DOC injections with 0.9% NaCl to drink for 6 wk resulted in diminished water intakes to isoproterenol, but drinking in response to intraperitoneal ANG II was increased (216). In contrast, isoproterenol caused a greater increase in water intake in the Brattleboro rats than in normal rats, which is probably explained by the increased baseline activity of its renal renin-angiotensin system (see sect. XI). Further support for renin involvement in isoproterenol-induced drinking were the findings that intravenous infusion of ANG II antibody (see sect. VB1) or intracerebroventricular injection of antisense to angiotensinogen mRNA (see sect. VB4) caused significant reduction in the isoproterenol drinking response. This seems to indicate that in the rat renal renin accounts for the greater part of isoproterenol-induced drinking.

However, this view can be contested. Because isoproterenol causes such widespread circulatory changes, some of which could result in increased drinking, it seems unlikely that renal renin is the exclusive or even the major stimulus to increased drinking. It has been suggested that the failure of the nephrectomized rat to drink in response to isoproterenol is because the animal is incapacitated by the profound hypotension produced by the drug when no renin secretion is possible (270). When the fall in blood pressure was prevented, nephrectomized rats drank much the same amounts of water as normal rats in response to isoproterenol. Findings in the dog also suggest that isoproterenol-induced drinking does not depend exclusively on renal renin. Isoproterenol was a powerful stimulus to increased water intake, at the same time causing a fall in urine flow (202). Marked hemodynamic changes preceded drinking by ~5 min with increases in heart rate and pulse pressure, a fall in central venous pressure, but little alteration in mean arterial pressure. As in the rat, drinking was dose dependent, and it was prevented by propranolol and enhanced by phentolamine, but unlike in rat, it was little affected by bilateral nephrectomy. It could be argued that the persistence of drinking after nephrectomy is accounted for by the greater hemodynamic effects of isoproterenol in the absence of renal renin secretion and that when these effects are limited by renin secretion in the intact animal, the renin stimulus to drinking itself becomes more important. Furthermore, in the intact dog, infusion of saralasin into the third ventricle inhibited drinking in response to a single subcutaneous dose of isoproterenol, showing that there are circumstances where renal renin does contribute importantly to drinking (466). Nevertheless, as in the rat, the results suggest that increased renin secretion is not the exclusive stimulus to increased drinking after isoproterenol.

Two important conclusions can be drawn from these experiments with beta -adrenergic drugs. First, they show that endogenously released renal renin can make a substantial contribution to increased water intake; enough renin can be released from the animal's own kidneys to do this. Second, the experiments also show that beta -adrenergic-induced drinking does not depend exclusively on renal renin but that there are also other mechanisms operating that do not depend on it. In an attempt to assess the relative importance of these factors, water intake, blood pressure, and plasma ANG II levels were measured in normal, nephrectomized, and ureterically ligated rats treated with isoproterenol (473). The results show that rats with kidneys drank more readily than nephrectomized rats and that in intact animals plasma levels of ANG II at over 300 fmol/ml were in excess of the 200 fmol/ml required to generate thirst in the water-replete rat (354). However, substantial drinking could also be induced after nephrectomy when large doses of isoproterenol were administered in a controlled manner. The mechanism of this non-renin-dependent intake is uncertain; activation of an unidentified central beta -adrenergic mechanism could be responsible, but altered baroreceptor input resulting from the peripheral hemodynamic changes is a more likely explanation.

The effects of beta -adrenergic stimulation on NaCl intake are not impressive, at least in rats. In normal rats, repeated injections of isoproterenol at 3- to 4-day intervals led to a small and inconsistent increase in NaCl intake in short-term experiments (69). The effects were not large. In the light of the suggestion that elevated levels of ANG II elicit NaCl intake in addition to water intake when arterial blood pressure is low to normal (618), it is puzzling that isoproterenol should be such an ineffective natriorexigenic stimulus. However, this would accord with the view, although disputed, that in the rat the expression of sodium appetite depends on ANG II formed from renin-angiotensin precursors synthesized in the central nervous system and that circulating hormone is not involved (see sect. VIIC2). In adrenalectomized rats, pharmacological activation of the renal renin-angiotensin system with isoproterenol or phentolamine caused increased water intake, as just described, but it did not stimulate NaCl intake in sodium-replete animals, and it decreased NaCl intake in sodium-depleted animals (206). Therefore, even in salt drinkers as experienced as sodium-depleted adrenalectomized rats, isoproterenol was a more potent immediate stimulus to water intake than to NaCl intake.

B. Furosemide

The loop diuretic furosemide has been extensively used in research on mechanisms of thirst and sodium appetite because it causes a brisk diuresis and natriuresis, producing a mixed water and sodium depletion, and it is a powerful stimulus to the renin-angiotensin system. Furosemide causes an acute rise in plasma renin that is mediated by increased PGs, with prostacyclin having a direct effect on the juxtaglomerular cells, and a slower, continuing rise in renin that is related to the developing sodium and volume depletion (133). The PGs originate from the macula densa after blockade of chloride transport and from the intrarenal baroreceptors after alteration in renal hemodynamics. Furosemide causes increases in intakes of water and NaCl. The onset of drinking is slower than after isoproterenol and seems to be a consequence of the diuresis, since the increase in water intake runs parallel to the developing fluid deficit. This is in contrast to the mechanism of the increased water intake induced by isoproterenol that occurs despite the accompanying fall in urine flow. The brisker onset of drinking after isoproterenol is probably accounted for by the widespread hemodynamic effects caused by the drug as well as by increased renin secretion, and these factors are additive in their effect on water intake. Unlike isoproterenol, furosemide causes an increase in sodium appetite, and this effect has been exploited in the analysis of mechanisms of sodium depletion-induced appetite, particularly in the rat. It has also been shown to cause increased sodium appetite in the baboon (124). Furosemide causes an increase in sodium appetite because it is natriuretic, whereas isoproterenol is not.

It has been claimed that in the rat the resulting sodium depletion after furosemide stimulates NaCl intake exclusively through activation of a brain renin-angiotensin system, although this has been disputed (see sect. VIIC2). The following experiment indicates the importance of peripheral factors. When rats were injected with subcutaneous furosemide (10 mg/kg) combined with a small subcutaneous dose (5 mg/kg) of captopril, the intakes of water and NaCl were more than double the sum of the intakes after either substance alone (618). The increased intakes after furosemide and low doses of captopril were abolished by subcutaneous losartan, and also by large doses (100 mg/kg) of captopril, providing evidence that ANG II is involved in both behaviors. After the combination of furosemide and low doses of captopril, the fall in mean arterial blood pressure was a factor in increased NaCl intake because intravenous phenylephrine, which prevented the fall in pressure, blunted the increase in NaCl intake but not that of water, whereas the vasodilator minoxidil combined with the low dose of captopril caused a robust sodium appetite. It was concluded from these experiments that activation of the renin-angiotensin system is necessary for the rapid ingestion of water and NaCl after furosemide and that hypotension by itself is not enough, although changes in arterial pressure modulate the behaviors. However, the effects of isoproterenol in nephrectomized animals just discussed suggest that it is a question of degree whether or not the fall in blood pressure by itself stimulates drinking in the absence of a contribution from ANG II.

C. Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are dipsogenic and natriorexigenic challenges in their own right, and they are widely used in research on thirst and sodium appetite. They have been invaluable in establishing a role for endogenously generated ANG II in various types of drinking behavior, and their use has given considerable insight into the ways in which renin-angiotensin systems contribute to drinking behavior. They have complex effects on drinking that depend on dose, route of administration, whether or not an existing stimulus to thirst or sodium appetite is also present, on the nature of that stimulus, and on the duration of the treatment. A further complication is that various other biologically active peptides including bradykinin, substance P, neurokinins, neurotensin, and opioids are cleaved by ACE and will therefore be affected by captopril, and this could influence drinking. It is simple to understand why drinking induced by intracranial ANG I is blocked by ACE inhibitors and why ANG II-induced drinking is unaffected. However, the effects of varying systemic dosage of ACE inhibitors on drinking behavior are more complicated. Systemically administered ACE inhibitors such as teprotide or captopril prevent the peripheral conversion of ANG I to ANG II, releasing renal renin secretion from negative-feedback inhibition by ANG II, with the result that levels of renin and ANG I in the bloodstream increase. After low to moderate systemic doses of ACE inhibitors, peripheral block of ACE may be complete, but there may also be enough unblocked ACE in the brain to allow the increased amounts of blood-borne ANG I reaching it to be converted to ANG II, whereas after larger doses, intracerebral conversion is, at least initially, also blocked. Some ACE inhibitors, e.g., quinapril and benazapril, do not easily cross the blood-brain barrier so that brain ACE may escape inhibition.

Central ACE blockade seems to wear off even when high systemic dosage of ACE inhibitor is maintained. Chronic systemic administration of captopril induces ACE biosynthesis peripherally and in the brain while still being able to block the pressor response to intravenous ANG I (632). Repeated administration of spirapril led to partial escape from ACE inhibition, reflected in shorter lasting suppression of ANG II levels with subsequent administration (633). If ACE biosynthesis results in less complete captopril block of ANG I conversion in brain than peripherally, this could lead to increased ANG II formation from the high levels of ANG I reaching those brain areas in which there is unblocked enzyme. Because there are also several isoforms of ACE present in brain tissue with differing affinities for ACE inhibitors (691), it is understandable why it is almost impossible to maintain total ACE blockade for any length of time. Furthermore, other enzymes not blocked by ACE inhibitors can generate ANG II (35), and there is greatly increased production of ANG-(1--7) after ACE inhibition (see sect. VD). It is therefore possible that unblocked pathways of ANG II generation and altered production of other angiotensin peptides account for some of the changes in drinking behavior observed after ACE inhibitors.

1. Short-term effects on thirst

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors given alone may cause some increase in water intake. Depending on dose, they may also either augment or inhibit drinking caused by different dipsogenic challenges. Drinking in response to injected ANG II is preserved after complete ACE blockade, but ANG I-induced drinking is inhibited. The effect of systemic ACE inhibitors on drinking caused by other thirst challenges depends on the nature of the challenge and on the degree and the duration of the blockade. The effects of the first 8 h or so of ACE blockade on water intake are considered here; long-term blockade is considered later in this section.

In the rat, an early finding (
332) was that subcutaneous injection of the ACE inhibitor teprotide (0.1 mg/kg) enhanced the water intake caused by thirst challenges thought to be renin dependent, such as subcutaneous isoproterenol or inferior vena caval obstruction (see sect. XA), as well as by challenges believed to depend much less on renal renin secretion such as subcutaneous polyethylene glycol (see sect. XC) and water deprivation. Subcutaneous teprotide by itself also caused a small increase in water intake in normal rats, but it did not have this effect in nephrectomized rats. Enhancement of isoproterenol-induced drinking after subcutaneous teprotide could be prevented by simultaneous lateral ventricular injection of a small amount (30 µg) of teprotide, which suggests that the additional water intake was caused by ANG II generated locally in the brain from the increased circulating ANG I reaching it. In these early experiments, the basic drinking responses to isoproterenol and caval ligation were unaffected by intracranial teprotide, which was interpreted as meaning that renal renin was only responsible for the teprotide-induced increases in drinking, not the basic response. However, use of more potent ACE inhibitors such as captopril has made it clear that not only are ACE inhibitor-induced increases in water intake renin dependent, the basic drinking responses to isoproterenol and caval ligation are themselves also partly renin dependent. In one experiment in which doses of captopril in the range 5-50 mg/kg were tested against isoproterenol-induced drinking, the enhancement described with teprotide was found with low doses of captopril, but high doses (50 mg/kg) were found to inhibit drinking (300). Similarly, caval ligation-induced drinking was reduced to below control values by a large subcutaneous dose of captopril (50 mg/kg) and enhanced by a small (0.5 mg/kg) dose (188). The inhibitory effect of a large subcutaneous dose of captopril could be mimicked by giving repeated microinjections (total 110 µg) of captopril into the third ventricle of rats subjected to caval ligation and treated with the lower subcutaneous dose. The enhancing effect of the lower dose was reversed by this combination.

The importance of renal renin in captopril-induced effects on drinking is demonstrated by the difference in responses to captopril shown by rats made anuric by either ureteric ligation or nephrectomy. Both procedures eliminate any possibility that alterations in drinking behavior are secondary to captopril-induced effects on urinary excretion, but ureteric ligation (see sect. XH) results in an increase in circulating renin, whereas nephrectomy eliminates renal renin. It was found that low to moderate subcutaneous doses (0.5-5 mg/kg) of captopril that were mildly dipsogenic in normal rats were much more so in rats with bilateral ureteric ligation, and not at all in bilaterally nephrectomized animals (142). When cerebral conversion of ANG I was prevented by intracranial captopril (25 µg), the dipsogenic effect of the lower doses of captopril was prevented. A high subcutaneous dose (50 mg/kg) did not at first stimulate drinking, but water intake did increase after some hours. Therefore, the dipsogenic effectiveness of captopril depends first on its ability to increase renal renin secretion and second on the presence of enough unblocked ACE or other enzymes in the brain to convert the increased amounts of ANG I reaching it to ANG II. The failure of the nephrectomized rat to drink after captopril supports the view that renal renin is essential for the captopril response. The larger water intakes by rats with ligated ureters compared with normal rats were all the more remarkable because they occurred despite the increasing water retention as drinking occurred. They show that drinking was primary and not secondary to increased urine flow.

The effects of ACE inhibitors on drinking in response to a variety of thirst challenges have given some measure of the varying contribution of endogenous ANG II in different types of drinking behavior. In the rat, high dosage of captopril was found to reduce the amount of water drunk following a period of water deprivation, but cellular dehydration thirst induced by hypertonic NaCl was unaffected (29). Similarly, the ACE inhibitor MK-421 caused partial inhibition of drinking after 24-h water deprivation but did not affect the response to hypertonic NaCl (215). As with other ACE inhibitors, isoproterenol-induced drinking and drinking in response to ANG I but not to ANG II were inhibited by MK-421. In an extended series of experiments in which low (0.5 mg/kg) and high (100 mg/kg) subcutaneous doses of captopril were tested against various thirst stimuli in rats, it was found that low doses enhanced drinking in response to isoproterenol, phentolamine, serotonin, and histamine (all systemically administered), whereas high doses either abolished drinking or, in the case of histamine, partly inhibited it (155). Thirst induced by polyethylene glycol-induced hypovolemia (see sect. XC) or water deprivation was enhanced by the low dose of captopril, but the high dose had no effect and the cellular thirst of hypertonic NaCl was affected by neither dose of captopril. Drinking induced by intravenous renin or by lateral ventricular ANG I or ANG II was not enhanced by low doses of captopril, but the high dose blocked drinking in response to intravenous renin and intracerebroventricular ANG I but not ANG II. Eight days after the induction of renal hypertension in rat by ligation of the abdominal aorta between the renal arteries (see sect. XF), high doses of captopril had the same effect as removing the ischemic renin-producing kidney and resulted in decreases in the elevated intakes of water and NaCl that had developed by then (109). The very high fluid intakes at this stage of experimental renal hypertension made it impractical to try to demonstrate the enhancing effect of low doses of captopril, but the more moderate increases in water intake that occur in the first few hours of experimental renal hypertension did show significant enhancement after low doses (204). In the wild rabbit, systemic injection of enalapril caused an increase in drinking (601), unmasking dipsogenic sensitivity to angiotensin peptides generated in vivo in a species whose drinking response to ANG II is equivocal (see sect. IIIB).

These results are consistent with the hypothesis that low systemic doses of ACE inhibitors stimulate water intake by activating the renal renin-angiotensin system. The dipsogenic effect is more powerful when basal renal renin secretion is already increased, but it does not occur when the ACE inhibitors enter or are placed in the brain in sufficient amounts to prevent intracerebral conversion of ANG I to ANG II, nor when the kidneys have been removed. Enhancement of drinking caused by low subcutaneous doses of ACE inhibitors in the presence of an existing thirst stimulus is a sensitive indicator of a renal renin contribution to drinking in response to the particular stimulus in question, and inhibition by high systemic doses demonstrates the extent to which synthesis of ANG II is essential for increased drinking. In the longer term, the high systemic doses of captopril may also start to stimulate drinking, probably owing to ACE biosynthesis in the brain and therefore increased ANG II formation. The thirst and sodium appetite of hypovolemia are most affected by ACE inhibitors, but the thirst of water deprivation is also affected when the extracellular fluid deficit is sufficient to lead to significant renal renin release. It is possible, but not proven, that other angiotensin peptides may also participate. Increased drinking after captopril is not secondary to urinary fluid loss. It does depend on increased circulating ANG I being converted to ANG II in the brain.

2. Short-term effects on sodium appetite

When there is a preexisting sodium appetite, acute systemic administration of captopril may cause increases or decreases in NaCl intake, depending on the dose of captopril and on the original cause of the increased sodium appetite, but in the short term, captopril by itself does not appear to be natriorexigenic, although it causes a developing sodium appetite when given systemically over several days as discussed later in this section. In the adrenalectomized rat where plasma renin and NaCl intake were already high, low subcutaneous doses (0.5 mg/kg) of captopril caused further increases in intakes of 2.7% NaCl and also of water (
143). On the other hand, high doses (50 mg/kg) caused a reduction in the elevated baseline NaCl intake of the adrenalectomized rat, followed by a gradually developing increase in water intake. Adrenalectomized rats maintained on dexamethasone, which improves general health and prevents angiotensinogen depletion (558), showed increases in intakes of water and NaCl after low doses of captopril similar to those of untreated adrenalectomized rats and reduction in NaCl intake after large doses. The elevated intakes of water and NaCl of rats with renal hypertension (see sect. XF) were reduced by high subcutaneous doses of captopril. Similar results were obtained in normal rats made sodium deficient with furosemide with overnight intravenous infusions of captopril (394). The overnight 3% NaCl intake after administration of low doses of captopril in the drinking water (0.1 mg/ml) was enhanced, but this could be prevented by simultaneous intracerebroventricular infusion of captopril (1.2 µg/h). The increased 1.5% NaCl intake that normal 24-h water-deprived rats show after being allowed to rehydrate on only water for 2 h was reduced by intraperitoneal captopril (12 and 24 mg/kg) (516). Circulating ANG II therefore seems to be a stimulus to increased sodium appetite in these various experimental conditions.

In striking contrast to the stimulatory and inhibitory effects of the different doses of captopril in adrenalectomized, renal hypertensive or normal sodium-depleted or water-deprived rats, captopril had neither a stimulatory nor an inhibitory effect on the elevated NaCl intake of rats treated with DOCA in which the extracellular space is expanded and renal renin secretion inhibited (143, 303, 660). Although captopril had no effect on the intakes of water and NaCl of DOCA-treated rats, rats pretreated this way remained fully responsive to exogenous ANG II, and increased their intakes of both fluids in response to intracranial injection of ANG II.

However, a range of subcutaneous doses of captopril also had no effect on NaCl intake in rats in which basal renin secretion had been increased by bilateral ureteric ligation, although these animals increased their water intake after lower doses as described earlier. One possible reason for the inability of captopril to increase NaCl intake in this animal preparation is that acute preexcitation of renal renin secretion by itself is not enough to stimulate sodium appetite in the short term. At the time of captopril treatment, hyperreninemia and any behavioral effects caused by ureteric ligation are necessarily of a few hours standing only. Therefore, sodium appetite is less likely to be expressed than in the normal sodium-depleted animal where the depletion has taken many hours or days to develop or in the adrenalectomized or renal hypertensive animal in which the surgical procedure was generally carried out some days previously. Hyperreninemia in these cases is much longer standing than in ureteric ligation. This interpretation would be consistent with the failure of isoproterenol to augment NaCl intake in the short term in the normal rat. There are other possible explanations why captopril fails to stimulate sodium appetite in the ureterically ligated rat. Some additional stimulus such as hypovolemia, provided by sodium depletion, adrenalectomy, or renal hypertension but not by ureteric ligation, may be required for captopril-induced increases in renal renin secretion to have a short-term stimulatory effect on sodium appetite. Second, uremia after the cessation of urine flow or other consequences of ureteric ligation may be inhibitory to the appetite (see sect. IV). There may be other reasons.

Systemic administration of captopril depresses sodium appetite in sodium-depleted mice, sheep, and cattle as well as rats. In mice depleted of sodium by treatment with furosemide, the suppression of NaCl intake caused by intraperitoneal captopril could be reversed by subcutaneous injection of ANG II, even though by itself subcutaneous ANG II had no effect on NaCl intake (654). This was also true in the captopril-blockaded sodium-depleted rat treated with intravenous ANG II (174) (see sect. IIIA2). In sodium-depleted sheep, the decrease in 0.6 M NaHCO3 intake caused by intravenous captopril could be prevented by intravenous ANG II (657). There were similar findings in the cow, which does show an increase in 0.3 M NaHCO3-NaCl solution intake in response to intravenous ANG II; in sodium-depleted cows, intravenous ANG II reversed the reduction in intakes of water and sodium caused by intravenous captopril (45). In the sodium-depleted wild rabbit, enalapril